High-risk AI transparency? On qualified transparency mandates for oversight bodies under the EU AI Act
The legal opacity of AI technologies has long posed challenges in addressing algorithmic harms, as secrecy enables companies to retain competitive advantages while limiting public scrutiny. In response, ideas such as qualified transparency have been proposed to provide AI accountability within the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Kasia Söderlund |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
openjournals.nl
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Technology and Regulation |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://techreg.org/article/view/19876 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Regulating high-reach AI: On transparency directions in the Digital Services Act
by: Kasia Söderlund, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01) -
AI-generated journalism: Do the transparency provisions in the AI Act give news readers what they hope for?
by: Stanislaw Piasecki, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01) -
A systematic review of regulatory strategies and transparency mandates in AI regulation in Europe, the United States, and Canada
by: Mona Sloane, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
The AI Act in a law enforcement context: The case of automatic speech recognition for transcribing investigative interviews
by: Radina Stoykova, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
AI Transparency: A Conceptual, Normative, and Practical Frame Analysis
by: Sónia Pedro Sebastião, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01)