The “plant neurobiology” revolution
The 21st-century “plant neurobiology” movement is an amalgam of scholars interested in how “neural processes”, broadly defined, lead to changes in plant behavior. Integral to the movement (now called plant behavioral biology) is a triad of historically marginalized subdisciplines, namely plant ethol...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Plant Signaling & Behavior |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2024.2345413 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850088686320877568 |
|---|---|
| author | Peter V. Minorsky |
| author_facet | Peter V. Minorsky |
| author_sort | Peter V. Minorsky |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The 21st-century “plant neurobiology” movement is an amalgam of scholars interested in how “neural processes”, broadly defined, lead to changes in plant behavior. Integral to the movement (now called plant behavioral biology) is a triad of historically marginalized subdisciplines, namely plant ethology, whole plant electrophysiology and plant comparative psychology, that set plant neurobiology apart from the mainstream. A central tenet held by these “triad disciplines” is that plants are exquisitely sensitive to environmental perturbations and that destructive experimental manipulations rapidly and profoundly affect plant function. Since destructive measurements have been the norm in plant physiology, much of our “textbook knowledge” concerning plant physiology is unrelated to normal plant function. As such, scientists in the triad disciplines favor a more natural and holistic approach toward understanding plant function. By examining the history, philosophy, sociology and psychology of the triad disciplines, this paper refutes in eight ways the criticism that plant neurobiology presents nothing new, and that the topics of plant neurobiology fall squarely under the purview of mainstream plant physiology. It is argued that although the triad disciplines and mainstream plant physiology share the common goal of understanding plant function, they are distinct in having their own intellectual histories and epistemologies. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-bc37bbf7afc84b1b878de713af80dc17 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1559-2316 1559-2324 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Plant Signaling & Behavior |
| spelling | doaj-art-bc37bbf7afc84b1b878de713af80dc172025-08-20T02:42:57ZengTaylor & Francis GroupPlant Signaling & Behavior1559-23161559-23242024-12-0119110.1080/15592324.2024.23454132345413The “plant neurobiology” revolutionPeter V. Minorsky0Mercy UniversityThe 21st-century “plant neurobiology” movement is an amalgam of scholars interested in how “neural processes”, broadly defined, lead to changes in plant behavior. Integral to the movement (now called plant behavioral biology) is a triad of historically marginalized subdisciplines, namely plant ethology, whole plant electrophysiology and plant comparative psychology, that set plant neurobiology apart from the mainstream. A central tenet held by these “triad disciplines” is that plants are exquisitely sensitive to environmental perturbations and that destructive experimental manipulations rapidly and profoundly affect plant function. Since destructive measurements have been the norm in plant physiology, much of our “textbook knowledge” concerning plant physiology is unrelated to normal plant function. As such, scientists in the triad disciplines favor a more natural and holistic approach toward understanding plant function. By examining the history, philosophy, sociology and psychology of the triad disciplines, this paper refutes in eight ways the criticism that plant neurobiology presents nothing new, and that the topics of plant neurobiology fall squarely under the purview of mainstream plant physiology. It is argued that although the triad disciplines and mainstream plant physiology share the common goal of understanding plant function, they are distinct in having their own intellectual histories and epistemologies.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2024.2345413plant neurobiologyromantic biologyholistic biologyphilosophyplant psychology |
| spellingShingle | Peter V. Minorsky The “plant neurobiology” revolution Plant Signaling & Behavior plant neurobiology romantic biology holistic biology philosophy plant psychology |
| title | The “plant neurobiology” revolution |
| title_full | The “plant neurobiology” revolution |
| title_fullStr | The “plant neurobiology” revolution |
| title_full_unstemmed | The “plant neurobiology” revolution |
| title_short | The “plant neurobiology” revolution |
| title_sort | plant neurobiology revolution |
| topic | plant neurobiology romantic biology holistic biology philosophy plant psychology |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2024.2345413 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT petervminorsky theplantneurobiologyrevolution AT petervminorsky plantneurobiologyrevolution |