Discussion on Muskingum versus Integrator-Delay Models for Control Objectives
A comparative study about two models, Muskingum and integrator-delay (ID) models, for canal control is presented. The former is a simplified hydrological model which is very simple and extensively used in hydraulic engineering for simulation and prediction. The latter is also a model with physical m...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Applied Mathematics |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/197907 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832558341384044544 |
|---|---|
| author | Yolanda Bolea Vicenç Puig Antoni Grau |
| author_facet | Yolanda Bolea Vicenç Puig Antoni Grau |
| author_sort | Yolanda Bolea |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | A comparative study about two models, Muskingum and integrator-delay (ID) models, for canal control is presented. The former is a simplified hydrological model which is very simple and extensively used in hydraulic engineering for simulation and prediction. The latter is also a model with physical meaning and is widely used for irrigation canals control. Due to a lack of general awareness of Muskingum prediction model in regulation from the control community, authors present this comparative study with the ID control model. Both models have been studied and analyzed for control purposes. This study has been carried out and validated in a real irrigation canal, at Aghili irrigation district in Iran, using two traditional control approaches, PID with feedback and predictive control. The results demonstrate the advantages and drawbacks of both models, showing the benefits and limitations of using the widespread Muskingum model among the hydraulics scientific community for control design. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-bc1d5629e3364646ad6b80b9d561454f |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1110-757X 1687-0042 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Applied Mathematics |
| spelling | doaj-art-bc1d5629e3364646ad6b80b9d561454f2025-02-03T01:32:39ZengWileyJournal of Applied Mathematics1110-757X1687-00422014-01-01201410.1155/2014/197907197907Discussion on Muskingum versus Integrator-Delay Models for Control ObjectivesYolanda Bolea0Vicenç Puig1Antoni Grau2Automatic Control Department, Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), Pau Gargallo 5, 08028 Barcelona, SpainAutomatic Control Department, Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), Pau Gargallo 5, 08028 Barcelona, SpainAutomatic Control Department, Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), Pau Gargallo 5, 08028 Barcelona, SpainA comparative study about two models, Muskingum and integrator-delay (ID) models, for canal control is presented. The former is a simplified hydrological model which is very simple and extensively used in hydraulic engineering for simulation and prediction. The latter is also a model with physical meaning and is widely used for irrigation canals control. Due to a lack of general awareness of Muskingum prediction model in regulation from the control community, authors present this comparative study with the ID control model. Both models have been studied and analyzed for control purposes. This study has been carried out and validated in a real irrigation canal, at Aghili irrigation district in Iran, using two traditional control approaches, PID with feedback and predictive control. The results demonstrate the advantages and drawbacks of both models, showing the benefits and limitations of using the widespread Muskingum model among the hydraulics scientific community for control design.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/197907 |
| spellingShingle | Yolanda Bolea Vicenç Puig Antoni Grau Discussion on Muskingum versus Integrator-Delay Models for Control Objectives Journal of Applied Mathematics |
| title | Discussion on Muskingum versus Integrator-Delay Models for Control Objectives |
| title_full | Discussion on Muskingum versus Integrator-Delay Models for Control Objectives |
| title_fullStr | Discussion on Muskingum versus Integrator-Delay Models for Control Objectives |
| title_full_unstemmed | Discussion on Muskingum versus Integrator-Delay Models for Control Objectives |
| title_short | Discussion on Muskingum versus Integrator-Delay Models for Control Objectives |
| title_sort | discussion on muskingum versus integrator delay models for control objectives |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/197907 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yolandabolea discussiononmuskingumversusintegratordelaymodelsforcontrolobjectives AT vicencpuig discussiononmuskingumversusintegratordelaymodelsforcontrolobjectives AT antonigrau discussiononmuskingumversusintegratordelaymodelsforcontrolobjectives |