Comparative performance of PtRu/C catalysts synthesized by different methods for direct methanol fuel cells under various operating conditions

This work presents a comparative study of three synthesis methods for PtRu/C catalysts for use in polymer electrolyte fuel cells, investigating their activity in methanol oxidation. The evaluated methods were formic acid reduction (FAM), methanol reduction (ARM), and ethylene glycol reduction (ARE)....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elson Almeida De Souza, Rudyere Nascimento Silva, Daniel A. Gonçalves, Leandro Aparecido Pocrifka, Raimundo Ribeiro Passos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Nanotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnano.2024.1515034/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850061140731625472
author Elson Almeida De Souza
Rudyere Nascimento Silva
Daniel A. Gonçalves
Leandro Aparecido Pocrifka
Raimundo Ribeiro Passos
author_facet Elson Almeida De Souza
Rudyere Nascimento Silva
Daniel A. Gonçalves
Leandro Aparecido Pocrifka
Raimundo Ribeiro Passos
author_sort Elson Almeida De Souza
collection DOAJ
description This work presents a comparative study of three synthesis methods for PtRu/C catalysts for use in polymer electrolyte fuel cells, investigating their activity in methanol oxidation. The evaluated methods were formic acid reduction (FAM), methanol reduction (ARM), and ethylene glycol reduction (ARE). XRD analysis confirmed the formation of a Pt-Ru binary alloy in all syntheses. Electrochemical tests indicated that all catalysts were properly prepared, with the PtRu/CARE catalyst standing out as having the best performance, achieving a power density of 74,88 mW cm−2 at 90°C and an oxygen pressure of 3 atm on the cathode. These results highlight the potential of PtRu/CARE for application in direct methanol fuel cells, surpassing the catalysts obtained through the other methods.
format Article
id doaj-art-bc076f0c1b1f4327ae3f2d7676baba20
institution DOAJ
issn 2673-3013
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Nanotechnology
spelling doaj-art-bc076f0c1b1f4327ae3f2d7676baba202025-08-20T02:50:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Nanotechnology2673-30132024-12-01610.3389/fnano.2024.15150341515034Comparative performance of PtRu/C catalysts synthesized by different methods for direct methanol fuel cells under various operating conditionsElson Almeida De Souza0Rudyere Nascimento Silva1Daniel A. Gonçalves2Leandro Aparecido Pocrifka3Raimundo Ribeiro Passos4Institute of Technology and Exact Sciences, Federal University of Amazonas – UFAM, Itacoatiara, BrazilDepartment of Chemistry, Environment, and Food – DQA, Manaus Center Campus, Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology of Amazonas – IFAM, Manaus, BrazilElectrochemistry and Energy Laboratory – LEEN, Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Amazonas – UFAM, Manaus, BrazilElectrochemistry and Energy Laboratory – LEEN, Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Amazonas – UFAM, Manaus, BrazilElectrochemistry and Energy Laboratory – LEEN, Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Amazonas – UFAM, Manaus, BrazilThis work presents a comparative study of three synthesis methods for PtRu/C catalysts for use in polymer electrolyte fuel cells, investigating their activity in methanol oxidation. The evaluated methods were formic acid reduction (FAM), methanol reduction (ARM), and ethylene glycol reduction (ARE). XRD analysis confirmed the formation of a Pt-Ru binary alloy in all syntheses. Electrochemical tests indicated that all catalysts were properly prepared, with the PtRu/CARE catalyst standing out as having the best performance, achieving a power density of 74,88 mW cm−2 at 90°C and an oxygen pressure of 3 atm on the cathode. These results highlight the potential of PtRu/CARE for application in direct methanol fuel cells, surpassing the catalysts obtained through the other methods.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnano.2024.1515034/fulldirect methanol fuel cellsPtRu/Cethylene glycol reductionelectrochemical oxidationbimetallic catalystselectrocatalyst synthesis
spellingShingle Elson Almeida De Souza
Rudyere Nascimento Silva
Daniel A. Gonçalves
Leandro Aparecido Pocrifka
Raimundo Ribeiro Passos
Comparative performance of PtRu/C catalysts synthesized by different methods for direct methanol fuel cells under various operating conditions
Frontiers in Nanotechnology
direct methanol fuel cells
PtRu/C
ethylene glycol reduction
electrochemical oxidation
bimetallic catalysts
electrocatalyst synthesis
title Comparative performance of PtRu/C catalysts synthesized by different methods for direct methanol fuel cells under various operating conditions
title_full Comparative performance of PtRu/C catalysts synthesized by different methods for direct methanol fuel cells under various operating conditions
title_fullStr Comparative performance of PtRu/C catalysts synthesized by different methods for direct methanol fuel cells under various operating conditions
title_full_unstemmed Comparative performance of PtRu/C catalysts synthesized by different methods for direct methanol fuel cells under various operating conditions
title_short Comparative performance of PtRu/C catalysts synthesized by different methods for direct methanol fuel cells under various operating conditions
title_sort comparative performance of ptru c catalysts synthesized by different methods for direct methanol fuel cells under various operating conditions
topic direct methanol fuel cells
PtRu/C
ethylene glycol reduction
electrochemical oxidation
bimetallic catalysts
electrocatalyst synthesis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnano.2024.1515034/full
work_keys_str_mv AT elsonalmeidadesouza comparativeperformanceofptruccatalystssynthesizedbydifferentmethodsfordirectmethanolfuelcellsundervariousoperatingconditions
AT rudyerenascimentosilva comparativeperformanceofptruccatalystssynthesizedbydifferentmethodsfordirectmethanolfuelcellsundervariousoperatingconditions
AT danielagoncalves comparativeperformanceofptruccatalystssynthesizedbydifferentmethodsfordirectmethanolfuelcellsundervariousoperatingconditions
AT leandroaparecidopocrifka comparativeperformanceofptruccatalystssynthesizedbydifferentmethodsfordirectmethanolfuelcellsundervariousoperatingconditions
AT raimundoribeiropassos comparativeperformanceofptruccatalystssynthesizedbydifferentmethodsfordirectmethanolfuelcellsundervariousoperatingconditions