The Impact of Manufacturing Technology on the Tube-Steel Concrete Columns Bearing Capacity Under Axial Load

Current construction puts forward new requirements for the construction of important buildings and structures every year. In this regard, new approaches to the design of buildings and structures using modern types of structural elements should take priority, which includes the vibrocentrifuged tube...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Evgenii M. Shcherban’, Alexey N. Beskopylny, Sergei A. Stel’makh, Levon R. Mailyan, Ivan A. Panfilov, Alexander L. Mailyan, Natalya Shcherban’, Ivan Vialikov, Diana Elshaeva, Andrei Chernilnik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-03-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/6/950
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850089501118955520
author Evgenii M. Shcherban’
Alexey N. Beskopylny
Sergei A. Stel’makh
Levon R. Mailyan
Ivan A. Panfilov
Alexander L. Mailyan
Natalya Shcherban’
Ivan Vialikov
Diana Elshaeva
Andrei Chernilnik
author_facet Evgenii M. Shcherban’
Alexey N. Beskopylny
Sergei A. Stel’makh
Levon R. Mailyan
Ivan A. Panfilov
Alexander L. Mailyan
Natalya Shcherban’
Ivan Vialikov
Diana Elshaeva
Andrei Chernilnik
author_sort Evgenii M. Shcherban’
collection DOAJ
description Current construction puts forward new requirements for the construction of important buildings and structures every year. In this regard, new approaches to the design of buildings and structures using modern types of structural elements should take priority, which includes the vibrocentrifuged tube concrete columns. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of manufacturing tube concrete columns using vibration (V), centrifugation (C), and vibrocentrifugation (VC) technologies and to perform a comparative analysis with the bearing capacity of solid tube concrete columns. Compositions of concrete grades B25, B30 and B40 were developed and manufactured using V, C and VC technologies. The greatest compressive strength was recorded for vibrocentrifuged concrete. Three samples of solid tube concrete columns and nine samples of hollow tube concrete columns were made from these concrete types. It was found that VC tube concrete columns have the highest bearing capacity values, which are up to 30.4% greater than those of vibrated columns, up to 15.1% greater than those of centrifuged hollow tube concrete columns, and up to 12.9% greater than those of vibrated solid tube concrete columns. It was proven that the use of vibrocentrifugation technology allows for the reduction in the weight of concrete pipe structures because of the hollow concrete core and the increase in the load-bearing capacity because of the high compression of the concrete core by the steel casing pipe.
format Article
id doaj-art-bbfdfe73fdf64775939b98e3e35755d7
institution DOAJ
issn 2075-5309
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj-art-bbfdfe73fdf64775939b98e3e35755d72025-08-20T02:42:46ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092025-03-0115695010.3390/buildings15060950The Impact of Manufacturing Technology on the Tube-Steel Concrete Columns Bearing Capacity Under Axial LoadEvgenii M. Shcherban’0Alexey N. Beskopylny1Sergei A. Stel’makh2Levon R. Mailyan3Ivan A. Panfilov4Alexander L. Mailyan5Natalya Shcherban’6Ivan Vialikov7Diana Elshaeva8Andrei Chernilnik9Department of Engineering Geometry and Computer Graphics, Don State Technical University, 344003 Rostov-on-Don, RussiaDepartment of Transport Systems, Faculty of Roads and Transport Systems, Don State Technical University, 344003 Rostov-on-Don, RussiaDepartment of Unique Buildings and Constructions Engineering, Don State Technical University, 344003 Rostov-on-Don, RussiaDepartment of Unique Buildings and Constructions Engineering, Don State Technical University, 344003 Rostov-on-Don, RussiaDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Agribusiness Faculty, Don State Technical University, Gagarin, 1, 344003 Rostov-on-Don, RussiaDepartment of Urban Construction and Economy, Don State Technical University, 344003 Rostov-on-Don, RussiaDepartment of Unique Buildings and Constructions Engineering, Don State Technical University, 344003 Rostov-on-Don, RussiaSchool of Architecture, Design and Arts, Don State Technical University, 344003 Rostov-on-Don, RussiaDepartment of Unique Buildings and Constructions Engineering, Don State Technical University, 344003 Rostov-on-Don, RussiaDepartment of Unique Buildings and Constructions Engineering, Don State Technical University, 344003 Rostov-on-Don, RussiaCurrent construction puts forward new requirements for the construction of important buildings and structures every year. In this regard, new approaches to the design of buildings and structures using modern types of structural elements should take priority, which includes the vibrocentrifuged tube concrete columns. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of manufacturing tube concrete columns using vibration (V), centrifugation (C), and vibrocentrifugation (VC) technologies and to perform a comparative analysis with the bearing capacity of solid tube concrete columns. Compositions of concrete grades B25, B30 and B40 were developed and manufactured using V, C and VC technologies. The greatest compressive strength was recorded for vibrocentrifuged concrete. Three samples of solid tube concrete columns and nine samples of hollow tube concrete columns were made from these concrete types. It was found that VC tube concrete columns have the highest bearing capacity values, which are up to 30.4% greater than those of vibrated columns, up to 15.1% greater than those of centrifuged hollow tube concrete columns, and up to 12.9% greater than those of vibrated solid tube concrete columns. It was proven that the use of vibrocentrifugation technology allows for the reduction in the weight of concrete pipe structures because of the hollow concrete core and the increase in the load-bearing capacity because of the high compression of the concrete core by the steel casing pipe.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/6/950tube-steel concrete columnbearing capacityvibrated concretecentrifuged concretevibrocentrifuged concreteDrucker–Prager concrete model
spellingShingle Evgenii M. Shcherban’
Alexey N. Beskopylny
Sergei A. Stel’makh
Levon R. Mailyan
Ivan A. Panfilov
Alexander L. Mailyan
Natalya Shcherban’
Ivan Vialikov
Diana Elshaeva
Andrei Chernilnik
The Impact of Manufacturing Technology on the Tube-Steel Concrete Columns Bearing Capacity Under Axial Load
Buildings
tube-steel concrete column
bearing capacity
vibrated concrete
centrifuged concrete
vibrocentrifuged concrete
Drucker–Prager concrete model
title The Impact of Manufacturing Technology on the Tube-Steel Concrete Columns Bearing Capacity Under Axial Load
title_full The Impact of Manufacturing Technology on the Tube-Steel Concrete Columns Bearing Capacity Under Axial Load
title_fullStr The Impact of Manufacturing Technology on the Tube-Steel Concrete Columns Bearing Capacity Under Axial Load
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Manufacturing Technology on the Tube-Steel Concrete Columns Bearing Capacity Under Axial Load
title_short The Impact of Manufacturing Technology on the Tube-Steel Concrete Columns Bearing Capacity Under Axial Load
title_sort impact of manufacturing technology on the tube steel concrete columns bearing capacity under axial load
topic tube-steel concrete column
bearing capacity
vibrated concrete
centrifuged concrete
vibrocentrifuged concrete
Drucker–Prager concrete model
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/6/950
work_keys_str_mv AT evgeniimshcherban theimpactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT alexeynbeskopylny theimpactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT sergeiastelmakh theimpactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT levonrmailyan theimpactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT ivanapanfilov theimpactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT alexanderlmailyan theimpactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT natalyashcherban theimpactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT ivanvialikov theimpactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT dianaelshaeva theimpactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT andreichernilnik theimpactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT evgeniimshcherban impactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT alexeynbeskopylny impactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT sergeiastelmakh impactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT levonrmailyan impactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT ivanapanfilov impactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT alexanderlmailyan impactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT natalyashcherban impactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT ivanvialikov impactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT dianaelshaeva impactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload
AT andreichernilnik impactofmanufacturingtechnologyonthetubesteelconcretecolumnsbearingcapacityunderaxialload