Different Oral Appliance Designs Demonstrate Different Rates of Efficacy for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Review Article

Obstructive Sleep Apnea afflicts an estimated 1 billion people worldwide. Untreated, Obstructive Sleep Apnea is linked with elevated levels of mortality, decreased quality of life and increased economic costs. However, several large population studies demonstrate that the efficacy of Continuous Posi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leonard A. Liptak, Edward Sall, Sung Kim, Erin Mosca, Shouresh Charkhandeh, John E. Remmers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-02-01
Series:Bioengineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/2/210
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849719694368440320
author Leonard A. Liptak
Edward Sall
Sung Kim
Erin Mosca
Shouresh Charkhandeh
John E. Remmers
author_facet Leonard A. Liptak
Edward Sall
Sung Kim
Erin Mosca
Shouresh Charkhandeh
John E. Remmers
author_sort Leonard A. Liptak
collection DOAJ
description Obstructive Sleep Apnea afflicts an estimated 1 billion people worldwide. Untreated, Obstructive Sleep Apnea is linked with elevated levels of mortality, decreased quality of life and increased economic costs. However, several large population studies demonstrate that the efficacy of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure therapy, the most frequently prescribed treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea, is compromised by frequent refusals and terminations. As a result, healthcare providers are evaluating non-CPAP treatment options. Oral Appliance Therapy has emerged as a leading non-CPAP treatment for patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Historically, healthcare providers have questioned the efficacy of Oral Appliance Therapy. Dozens of Oral Appliances are available to healthcare providers, with many contemporary Oral Appliances featuring improved designs, materials and technologies. This review investigates whether Oral Appliance design matters; do different Oral Appliance designs demonstrate different rates of efficacy? To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first review to exclusively focus on scientific papers that report treatment success with Oral Appliances as a residual Apnea Hypopnea Index of less than 10 events per hour. Out of 272 source papers, the 27 papers included in this review encompass a pooled sample of 3799 patients treated with six distinctly different categories of Oral Appliance designs. Chi-squared and two-sided Fisher’s exact tests indicate significant differences in efficacy amongst Oral Appliance designs. These findings suggest that certain Oral Appliance designs can enable highly efficacious treatment for patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Given these findings, healthcare providers should consider design when selecting an oral device for patients diagnosed with Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
format Article
id doaj-art-bbf123ca1c6149b98fd4e9aa10a4b861
institution DOAJ
issn 2306-5354
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Bioengineering
spelling doaj-art-bbf123ca1c6149b98fd4e9aa10a4b8612025-08-20T03:12:05ZengMDPI AGBioengineering2306-53542025-02-0112221010.3390/bioengineering12020210Different Oral Appliance Designs Demonstrate Different Rates of Efficacy for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Review ArticleLeonard A. Liptak0Edward Sall1Sung Kim2Erin Mosca3Shouresh Charkhandeh4John E. Remmers5ProSomnus Sleep Technologies, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USAProSomnus Sleep Technologies, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USAProSomnus Sleep Technologies, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USAProSomnus Sleep Technologies, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USAProSomnus Sleep Technologies, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USAProSomnus Sleep Technologies, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USAObstructive Sleep Apnea afflicts an estimated 1 billion people worldwide. Untreated, Obstructive Sleep Apnea is linked with elevated levels of mortality, decreased quality of life and increased economic costs. However, several large population studies demonstrate that the efficacy of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure therapy, the most frequently prescribed treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea, is compromised by frequent refusals and terminations. As a result, healthcare providers are evaluating non-CPAP treatment options. Oral Appliance Therapy has emerged as a leading non-CPAP treatment for patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Historically, healthcare providers have questioned the efficacy of Oral Appliance Therapy. Dozens of Oral Appliances are available to healthcare providers, with many contemporary Oral Appliances featuring improved designs, materials and technologies. This review investigates whether Oral Appliance design matters; do different Oral Appliance designs demonstrate different rates of efficacy? To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first review to exclusively focus on scientific papers that report treatment success with Oral Appliances as a residual Apnea Hypopnea Index of less than 10 events per hour. Out of 272 source papers, the 27 papers included in this review encompass a pooled sample of 3799 patients treated with six distinctly different categories of Oral Appliance designs. Chi-squared and two-sided Fisher’s exact tests indicate significant differences in efficacy amongst Oral Appliance designs. These findings suggest that certain Oral Appliance designs can enable highly efficacious treatment for patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Given these findings, healthcare providers should consider design when selecting an oral device for patients diagnosed with Obstructive Sleep Apnea.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/2/210Obstructive Sleep ApneaOral Appliance TherapyRespiratory Medicine
spellingShingle Leonard A. Liptak
Edward Sall
Sung Kim
Erin Mosca
Shouresh Charkhandeh
John E. Remmers
Different Oral Appliance Designs Demonstrate Different Rates of Efficacy for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Review Article
Bioengineering
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Oral Appliance Therapy
Respiratory Medicine
title Different Oral Appliance Designs Demonstrate Different Rates of Efficacy for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Review Article
title_full Different Oral Appliance Designs Demonstrate Different Rates of Efficacy for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Review Article
title_fullStr Different Oral Appliance Designs Demonstrate Different Rates of Efficacy for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Review Article
title_full_unstemmed Different Oral Appliance Designs Demonstrate Different Rates of Efficacy for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Review Article
title_short Different Oral Appliance Designs Demonstrate Different Rates of Efficacy for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Review Article
title_sort different oral appliance designs demonstrate different rates of efficacy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea a review article
topic Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Oral Appliance Therapy
Respiratory Medicine
url https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/2/210
work_keys_str_mv AT leonardaliptak differentoralappliancedesignsdemonstratedifferentratesofefficacyforthetreatmentofobstructivesleepapneaareviewarticle
AT edwardsall differentoralappliancedesignsdemonstratedifferentratesofefficacyforthetreatmentofobstructivesleepapneaareviewarticle
AT sungkim differentoralappliancedesignsdemonstratedifferentratesofefficacyforthetreatmentofobstructivesleepapneaareviewarticle
AT erinmosca differentoralappliancedesignsdemonstratedifferentratesofefficacyforthetreatmentofobstructivesleepapneaareviewarticle
AT shoureshcharkhandeh differentoralappliancedesignsdemonstratedifferentratesofefficacyforthetreatmentofobstructivesleepapneaareviewarticle
AT johneremmers differentoralappliancedesignsdemonstratedifferentratesofefficacyforthetreatmentofobstructivesleepapneaareviewarticle