A Statistical Approach to Assess Biological Equivalent Mean Organ Dose (MOD) for Different Fractionations in Thoracic Radiotherapy

<b>Background:</b> With advances in radiotherapy technology, there are more technological options and fractionation regiments for different stages of lung cancer. Evaluation of the possibility of severe organ toxicity for the organ-at-risks (OARs) is often required when treating patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siyao Zhong, Guangshan Wang, Xiaohang Qin, Yinghui Li, Bin Sun, Feng-Ming (Spring) Kong, Yuyan Gao, Jian-Yue Jin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Biomedicines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/5/1110
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:<b>Background:</b> With advances in radiotherapy technology, there are more technological options and fractionation regiments for different stages of lung cancer. Evaluation of the possibility of severe organ toxicity for the organ-at-risks (OARs) is often required when treating patients with unusual fractionations or combining two treatment plans with different fractionations. <b>Purpose:</b> This study aims to provide an approach that can reasonably estimate the possibility of toxicity using a biological equivalent mean organ dose (MOD)-based model from the 2 Gy per fraction era for various fractionations. <b>Methods and Materials:</b> The dose volume histograms (DVHs) of 272 patients treated with radiotherapy for lung cancer at a prescribed dose of 2 Gy × 30 f were used for analysis. For each patient, we calculated the biological equivalent MOD based on a dose conversion of EQD2 (equivalent to a dose of 2 Gy/fraction to the organ), the MOD based on the physical dose, and the d-value that makes the biological equivalent MOD based on a dose conversion of EQDd equal to the physical MOD. Statistical analysis was then performed to determine the relationship of the d-value to the corresponding physical MOD in percentage dose (relative MOD). <b>Results:</b> Equivalent MODs based on EQD2 were smaller than the physical MOD for each patient, suggesting that using EQD2 conversion would underestimate the equivalent MOD. The distribution of d-values with physical relative mean lung dose (RMLD) showed a normal peak with an average of d = 1.3 Gy, suggesting that the equivalent MLD can be estimated using EQD1.3 for various fractionations. Regression analysis showed that the d-value could be estimated as d = <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msqrt><mn>0.93</mn><mo>+</mo><mn>3.0</mn><mo>×</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">R</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">L</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi></msqrt></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, d = <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msqrt><mn>0.044</mn><mo>+</mo><mn>5.8</mn><mo>×</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">R</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">E</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi></msqrt></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, and d = <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msqrt><mn>4.7</mn><mo>×</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">R</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">H</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi></msqrt></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> for the lung, esophagus, and heart, respectively, suggesting that the equivalent MLD, MED, and MHD can be estimated using EQDd. <b>Conclusions:</b> Using EQD2 conversion underestimates the equivalent MOD, and the equivalent MOD converted by EQDd with an appropriate d-value may enhance the assessment of organ toxicity.
ISSN:2227-9059