Let’s Talk About Voices: randomised controlled crossover study of a resource to support mental health workers in supporting voice-hearers

Background Easily accessible, impactful, evidence-based resources are needed to assist mental health workers to best support voice-hearers in managing and living well with voices. Let’s Talk About Voices (LTAV) is an innovative suite of resources designed for mental health workers to use in suppor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Honey, Justin Newton Scanlan, Lyndal Sherwin, Haylee Zink, Karen Wells, Glenda Jessup, Nicola Hancock
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2025-07-01
Series:BJPsych Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056472425100719/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Easily accessible, impactful, evidence-based resources are needed to assist mental health workers to best support voice-hearers in managing and living well with voices. Let’s Talk About Voices (LTAV) is an innovative suite of resources designed for mental health workers to use in supporting voice-hearers. Aim This study aimed to assess the impact of LTAV on mental health workers’ self-reported capacity to work with voice-hearers. Method A randomised, controlled crossover design was used, with assessment at three time points. The assessment measure was co-developed by researchers, clinicians, peer workers and voice-hearers based on the aims of LTAV and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Participants were randomised into two groups. The immediate group received access to LTAV following the first assessment; the delayed group received access following the second assessment. In total, 256 mental health workers commenced the study, with 120 completing all assessments. Results Between-group comparisons for change between times 1 and 2 found a significant difference with a large effect size (F = 40.2, P < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.19). Significance remained on intention-to-treat analysis (F = 22.9, P < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.08). Pairwise repeated-measures comparisons found a significant increase in scores for both groups following access to LTAV, which was sustained at follow-up. Fourteen of 24 individual items showed significant change. Changes were consistent across professions, work settings and experience working with voice-hearers, but those with less confidence in working with voice-hearers on intake showed significantly stronger improvements. Conclusions This research indicates that LTAV has the potential to substantially improve mental health workers’ attitudes and confidence in supporting voice-hearers.
ISSN:2056-4724