From the Editor's Desk
The Grounded Theory Review focuses solely on classic grounded theories and methodological papers. Novice or lay readers may be unaware of the subtle elements that indicate a good classic theory. Peer reviewers, on the other hand, are experienced classic grounded theorists, who learned from Barney Gl...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sociology Press
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://groundedtheoryreview.org/index.php/gtr/article/view/332 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849683296635584512 |
|---|---|
| author | Alvita Nathaniel |
| author_facet | Alvita Nathaniel |
| author_sort | Alvita Nathaniel |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The Grounded Theory Review focuses solely on classic grounded theories and methodological papers. Novice or lay readers may be unaware of the subtle elements that indicate a good classic theory. Peer reviewers, on the other hand, are experienced classic grounded theorists, who learned from Barney Glaser, co-originator of the method. The reviewers know what to expect in a classic grounded theory study and what red flags indicate a study might not have adhered to the classic grounded theory method. Here, I describe some elements to help readers know what to expect when reading each section of a classic grounded theory paper and some red flags that indicate the method was not closely followed.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-bb9406b553d040e18e5902737f59d43a |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1556-1542 1556-1550 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | Sociology Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-bb9406b553d040e18e5902737f59d43a2025-08-20T03:23:57ZengSociology PressGrounded Theory Review: An International Journal1556-15421556-15502020-12-011902From the Editor's DeskAlvita NathanielThe Grounded Theory Review focuses solely on classic grounded theories and methodological papers. Novice or lay readers may be unaware of the subtle elements that indicate a good classic theory. Peer reviewers, on the other hand, are experienced classic grounded theorists, who learned from Barney Glaser, co-originator of the method. The reviewers know what to expect in a classic grounded theory study and what red flags indicate a study might not have adhered to the classic grounded theory method. Here, I describe some elements to help readers know what to expect when reading each section of a classic grounded theory paper and some red flags that indicate the method was not closely followed. https://groundedtheoryreview.org/index.php/gtr/article/view/332Grounded TheoryEditorialevaluating grounded theorytheoretical perspective |
| spellingShingle | Alvita Nathaniel From the Editor's Desk Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal Grounded Theory Editorial evaluating grounded theory theoretical perspective |
| title | From the Editor's Desk |
| title_full | From the Editor's Desk |
| title_fullStr | From the Editor's Desk |
| title_full_unstemmed | From the Editor's Desk |
| title_short | From the Editor's Desk |
| title_sort | from the editor s desk |
| topic | Grounded Theory Editorial evaluating grounded theory theoretical perspective |
| url | https://groundedtheoryreview.org/index.php/gtr/article/view/332 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alvitanathaniel fromtheeditorsdesk |