Delay adaptation does not transfer between discrete button press actions and continuous control

When interacting with technology, humans often deal with delays between an action and the desired action outcome. Through delay adaptation these delays will become less detrimental to visuomotor performance over time. Delay adaptation has been shown for a variety of tasks and control modes, from sim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Loes CJ van Dam, Svenja Kernig, Karina Lazarova, Melisa Ünal, Nicole Gappa, Benjamin Straube, Thomas SA Wallis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2025-07-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695251352067
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849427961803964416
author Loes CJ van Dam
Svenja Kernig
Karina Lazarova
Melisa Ünal
Nicole Gappa
Benjamin Straube
Thomas SA Wallis
author_facet Loes CJ van Dam
Svenja Kernig
Karina Lazarova
Melisa Ünal
Nicole Gappa
Benjamin Straube
Thomas SA Wallis
author_sort Loes CJ van Dam
collection DOAJ
description When interacting with technology, humans often deal with delays between an action and the desired action outcome. Through delay adaptation these delays will become less detrimental to visuomotor performance over time. Delay adaptation has been shown for a variety of tasks and control modes, from simple button presses causing a beep or flash to continuous target-tracking tasks. Here we investigated whether the delay adaptation is specific for the control mode used, when the task itself remained unaltered. To this end, participants performed a target tracking task in which they controlled a cursor item either by moving a stylus on a graphics tablet or by pressing the arrow keys on a keyboard. We found that delay adaptation occurred for both these types of control modes, but observed no transfer to the other control mode. This indicates that delay adaptation is specific to the control mode used during adaptation.
format Article
id doaj-art-bb8b42ca4eac480ab94c5812921064d2
institution Kabale University
issn 2041-6695
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series i-Perception
spelling doaj-art-bb8b42ca4eac480ab94c5812921064d22025-08-20T03:28:51ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952025-07-011610.1177/20416695251352067Delay adaptation does not transfer between discrete button press actions and continuous controlLoes CJ van Dam0Svenja Kernig1Karina Lazarova2Melisa Ünal3Nicole Gappa4Benjamin Straube5Thomas SA Wallis6 Department of Psychology, , Colchester, UK Technical University of Darmstadt (TU Darmstadt), Department of Human Sciences, Institute for Psychology/Centre for Cognitive Science, Darmstadt, Germany Technical University of Darmstadt (TU Darmstadt), Department of Human Sciences, Institute for Psychology/Centre for Cognitive Science, Darmstadt, Germany Technical University of Darmstadt (TU Darmstadt), Department of Human Sciences, Institute for Psychology/Centre for Cognitive Science, Darmstadt, Germany Technical University of Darmstadt (TU Darmstadt), Department of Human Sciences, Institute for Psychology/Centre for Cognitive Science, Darmstadt, Germany Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Technical University of Darmstadt, Marburg, GermanyWhen interacting with technology, humans often deal with delays between an action and the desired action outcome. Through delay adaptation these delays will become less detrimental to visuomotor performance over time. Delay adaptation has been shown for a variety of tasks and control modes, from simple button presses causing a beep or flash to continuous target-tracking tasks. Here we investigated whether the delay adaptation is specific for the control mode used, when the task itself remained unaltered. To this end, participants performed a target tracking task in which they controlled a cursor item either by moving a stylus on a graphics tablet or by pressing the arrow keys on a keyboard. We found that delay adaptation occurred for both these types of control modes, but observed no transfer to the other control mode. This indicates that delay adaptation is specific to the control mode used during adaptation.https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695251352067
spellingShingle Loes CJ van Dam
Svenja Kernig
Karina Lazarova
Melisa Ünal
Nicole Gappa
Benjamin Straube
Thomas SA Wallis
Delay adaptation does not transfer between discrete button press actions and continuous control
i-Perception
title Delay adaptation does not transfer between discrete button press actions and continuous control
title_full Delay adaptation does not transfer between discrete button press actions and continuous control
title_fullStr Delay adaptation does not transfer between discrete button press actions and continuous control
title_full_unstemmed Delay adaptation does not transfer between discrete button press actions and continuous control
title_short Delay adaptation does not transfer between discrete button press actions and continuous control
title_sort delay adaptation does not transfer between discrete button press actions and continuous control
url https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695251352067
work_keys_str_mv AT loescjvandam delayadaptationdoesnottransferbetweendiscretebuttonpressactionsandcontinuouscontrol
AT svenjakernig delayadaptationdoesnottransferbetweendiscretebuttonpressactionsandcontinuouscontrol
AT karinalazarova delayadaptationdoesnottransferbetweendiscretebuttonpressactionsandcontinuouscontrol
AT melisaunal delayadaptationdoesnottransferbetweendiscretebuttonpressactionsandcontinuouscontrol
AT nicolegappa delayadaptationdoesnottransferbetweendiscretebuttonpressactionsandcontinuouscontrol
AT benjaminstraube delayadaptationdoesnottransferbetweendiscretebuttonpressactionsandcontinuouscontrol
AT thomassawallis delayadaptationdoesnottransferbetweendiscretebuttonpressactionsandcontinuouscontrol