Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus conventional Coronary Artery Bypass surgery in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease in a real-world setting: In-hospital outcomes and medium-term follow-up: COHOS study

Objectives: The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the in-hospital and medium-term outcomes of hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) in the real-world setting compared to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: All patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dhamodaran Kaliyamoorthy, Meeranghani Mohamed Yusuf, Vadivelu Ramalingam, Abhishek Kasha, Manickam Kathiresan, Rizwan Suliankatchi Abdulkader, Jeyashree Kathiresan, Aishwarya Mahesh Kumar, Elsa Grace, Anirban Choudhury
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:Indian Heart Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483225000483
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849328737221345280
author Dhamodaran Kaliyamoorthy
Meeranghani Mohamed Yusuf
Vadivelu Ramalingam
Abhishek Kasha
Manickam Kathiresan
Rizwan Suliankatchi Abdulkader
Jeyashree Kathiresan
Aishwarya Mahesh Kumar
Elsa Grace
Anirban Choudhury
author_facet Dhamodaran Kaliyamoorthy
Meeranghani Mohamed Yusuf
Vadivelu Ramalingam
Abhishek Kasha
Manickam Kathiresan
Rizwan Suliankatchi Abdulkader
Jeyashree Kathiresan
Aishwarya Mahesh Kumar
Elsa Grace
Anirban Choudhury
author_sort Dhamodaran Kaliyamoorthy
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the in-hospital and medium-term outcomes of hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) in the real-world setting compared to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: All patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MV-CAD) who underwent conventional CABG and HCR in our institution between January 2018 to January 2021 were evaluated in terms of length of intensive care unit (ICU), in-hospital stay, repeat revascularization rates, bleeding, stroke, and in-hospital mortality. Clinical outcomes (mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCE]) were assessed at average follow up of 3.6 years. Results: Pre-procedural characteristics were balanced between the groups after propensity score matching. There was no significant difference in MACCE [Odds ratio: 0.57; 95 % CI: 0.05 to 1.52; p = 0.66], in-hospital mortality [n = 2 (1.9 %) vs n = 0; p = 0.80], post procedure stroke [n = 2 (1.9 %) vs n = 2 (3.7 %); p = 0.86], post-procedural myocardial infarction requiring repeat revascularization [n = 2 (1.9 %) versus n = 1 (1.9 %); p = 1] during the in-hospital stay of the patients in the CABG vs HCR groups respectively. HCR was associated with significantly lower requirement for blood transfusions, bleeding risk, in-hospital stay, and intensive care unit stay. Analysis of the outcomes after 3.6 years revealed no significant difference in MACCE [Odds ratio: 1.40; 95 % CI: 0.46 to 4.30; p = 0.55], and post discharge mortality [n = 0 vs n = 0; p = 1]. Both groups had similar rates of post-procedural myocardial infarction requiring repeat revascularization [n = 0 vs n = 4 (7.4 %); p = 0.278], and rate of re-intervention [n = 0 vs n = 3 (5.6 %); p = 0.41]. Conclusion: HCR may be considered as a safe and feasible alternative to conventional CABG in selected individuals with MV-CAD.
format Article
id doaj-art-bb75073f984e46e896f3f0cdb65b2b6d
institution Kabale University
issn 0019-4832
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Indian Heart Journal
spelling doaj-art-bb75073f984e46e896f3f0cdb65b2b6d2025-08-20T03:47:31ZengElsevierIndian Heart Journal0019-48322025-03-017729810410.1016/j.ihj.2025.03.002Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus conventional Coronary Artery Bypass surgery in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease in a real-world setting: In-hospital outcomes and medium-term follow-up: COHOS studyDhamodaran Kaliyamoorthy0Meeranghani Mohamed Yusuf1Vadivelu Ramalingam2Abhishek Kasha3Manickam Kathiresan4Rizwan Suliankatchi Abdulkader5Jeyashree Kathiresan6Aishwarya Mahesh Kumar7Elsa Grace8Anirban Choudhury9Apollo Hospitals, Greams Road, Chennai - 600006, India; Corresponding author. Apollo Hospitals, Chennai – 600006, India.Apollo Hospitals, Greams Road, Chennai - 600006, IndiaDepartment of Cardiology, Velammal Medical College Hospital, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, 625009, IndiaApollo Hospitals, Greams Road, Chennai - 600006, IndiaApollo Hospitals, Greams Road, Chennai - 600006, IndiaNational Institute of Epidemiology, Indian Council of Medical Research, Second Main Road, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Ayapakkam, Chennai - 600077, IndiaNational Institute of Epidemiology, Indian Council of Medical Research, Second Main Road, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Ayapakkam, Chennai - 600077, IndiaApollo Hospitals, Greams Road, Chennai - 600006, IndiaApollo Hospitals, Greams Road, Chennai - 600006, IndiaMorriston Cardiac Centre, Swansea, United KingdomObjectives: The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the in-hospital and medium-term outcomes of hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) in the real-world setting compared to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: All patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MV-CAD) who underwent conventional CABG and HCR in our institution between January 2018 to January 2021 were evaluated in terms of length of intensive care unit (ICU), in-hospital stay, repeat revascularization rates, bleeding, stroke, and in-hospital mortality. Clinical outcomes (mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCE]) were assessed at average follow up of 3.6 years. Results: Pre-procedural characteristics were balanced between the groups after propensity score matching. There was no significant difference in MACCE [Odds ratio: 0.57; 95 % CI: 0.05 to 1.52; p = 0.66], in-hospital mortality [n = 2 (1.9 %) vs n = 0; p = 0.80], post procedure stroke [n = 2 (1.9 %) vs n = 2 (3.7 %); p = 0.86], post-procedural myocardial infarction requiring repeat revascularization [n = 2 (1.9 %) versus n = 1 (1.9 %); p = 1] during the in-hospital stay of the patients in the CABG vs HCR groups respectively. HCR was associated with significantly lower requirement for blood transfusions, bleeding risk, in-hospital stay, and intensive care unit stay. Analysis of the outcomes after 3.6 years revealed no significant difference in MACCE [Odds ratio: 1.40; 95 % CI: 0.46 to 4.30; p = 0.55], and post discharge mortality [n = 0 vs n = 0; p = 1]. Both groups had similar rates of post-procedural myocardial infarction requiring repeat revascularization [n = 0 vs n = 4 (7.4 %); p = 0.278], and rate of re-intervention [n = 0 vs n = 3 (5.6 %); p = 0.41]. Conclusion: HCR may be considered as a safe and feasible alternative to conventional CABG in selected individuals with MV-CAD.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483225000483Hybrid coronary revascularizationCoronary Artery Bypass graftPercutaneous coronary interventionRobotic surgical procedures
spellingShingle Dhamodaran Kaliyamoorthy
Meeranghani Mohamed Yusuf
Vadivelu Ramalingam
Abhishek Kasha
Manickam Kathiresan
Rizwan Suliankatchi Abdulkader
Jeyashree Kathiresan
Aishwarya Mahesh Kumar
Elsa Grace
Anirban Choudhury
Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus conventional Coronary Artery Bypass surgery in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease in a real-world setting: In-hospital outcomes and medium-term follow-up: COHOS study
Indian Heart Journal
Hybrid coronary revascularization
Coronary Artery Bypass graft
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Robotic surgical procedures
title Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus conventional Coronary Artery Bypass surgery in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease in a real-world setting: In-hospital outcomes and medium-term follow-up: COHOS study
title_full Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus conventional Coronary Artery Bypass surgery in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease in a real-world setting: In-hospital outcomes and medium-term follow-up: COHOS study
title_fullStr Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus conventional Coronary Artery Bypass surgery in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease in a real-world setting: In-hospital outcomes and medium-term follow-up: COHOS study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus conventional Coronary Artery Bypass surgery in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease in a real-world setting: In-hospital outcomes and medium-term follow-up: COHOS study
title_short Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus conventional Coronary Artery Bypass surgery in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease in a real-world setting: In-hospital outcomes and medium-term follow-up: COHOS study
title_sort comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus conventional coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with multi vessel coronary artery disease in a real world setting in hospital outcomes and medium term follow up cohos study
topic Hybrid coronary revascularization
Coronary Artery Bypass graft
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Robotic surgical procedures
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483225000483
work_keys_str_mv AT dhamodarankaliyamoorthy comparisonofhybridcoronaryrevascularizationversusconventionalcoronaryarterybypasssurgeryinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseinarealworldsettinginhospitaloutcomesandmediumtermfollowupcohosstudy
AT meeranghanimohamedyusuf comparisonofhybridcoronaryrevascularizationversusconventionalcoronaryarterybypasssurgeryinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseinarealworldsettinginhospitaloutcomesandmediumtermfollowupcohosstudy
AT vadiveluramalingam comparisonofhybridcoronaryrevascularizationversusconventionalcoronaryarterybypasssurgeryinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseinarealworldsettinginhospitaloutcomesandmediumtermfollowupcohosstudy
AT abhishekkasha comparisonofhybridcoronaryrevascularizationversusconventionalcoronaryarterybypasssurgeryinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseinarealworldsettinginhospitaloutcomesandmediumtermfollowupcohosstudy
AT manickamkathiresan comparisonofhybridcoronaryrevascularizationversusconventionalcoronaryarterybypasssurgeryinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseinarealworldsettinginhospitaloutcomesandmediumtermfollowupcohosstudy
AT rizwansuliankatchiabdulkader comparisonofhybridcoronaryrevascularizationversusconventionalcoronaryarterybypasssurgeryinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseinarealworldsettinginhospitaloutcomesandmediumtermfollowupcohosstudy
AT jeyashreekathiresan comparisonofhybridcoronaryrevascularizationversusconventionalcoronaryarterybypasssurgeryinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseinarealworldsettinginhospitaloutcomesandmediumtermfollowupcohosstudy
AT aishwaryamaheshkumar comparisonofhybridcoronaryrevascularizationversusconventionalcoronaryarterybypasssurgeryinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseinarealworldsettinginhospitaloutcomesandmediumtermfollowupcohosstudy
AT elsagrace comparisonofhybridcoronaryrevascularizationversusconventionalcoronaryarterybypasssurgeryinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseinarealworldsettinginhospitaloutcomesandmediumtermfollowupcohosstudy
AT anirbanchoudhury comparisonofhybridcoronaryrevascularizationversusconventionalcoronaryarterybypasssurgeryinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseinarealworldsettinginhospitaloutcomesandmediumtermfollowupcohosstudy