Simulation and Economic Benefit Analysis of Carburetor Combined Transport in Winter at a Liquefied Natural Gas Receiving Station

In the winter, a certain LNG receiving terminal operates exclusively with the submerged combustion vaporizer (SCV). However, due to the high operational costs associated with the SCV, a new combined operation scheme utilizing both the SCV and the open rack vaporizer (ORV) has been proposed. First, m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Song Cao, Tao Luan, Pengliang Zuo, Xiaolei Si, Pu Xie, Yingjun Guo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/2/276
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832588577114947584
author Song Cao
Tao Luan
Pengliang Zuo
Xiaolei Si
Pu Xie
Yingjun Guo
author_facet Song Cao
Tao Luan
Pengliang Zuo
Xiaolei Si
Pu Xie
Yingjun Guo
author_sort Song Cao
collection DOAJ
description In the winter, a certain LNG receiving terminal operates exclusively with the submerged combustion vaporizer (SCV). However, due to the high operational costs associated with the SCV, a new combined operation scheme utilizing both the SCV and the open rack vaporizer (ORV) has been proposed. First, models for the SCV and ORV gasification units were developed in Aspen HYSYS and validated using actual operational parameters. Next, the relationship between the seawater inlet–outlet temperature difference and the minimum seawater flow rate for the ORV was determined, and an optimized seawater pump operation strategy, considering LNG export volumes, was formulated. Additionally, the relationship between the SCV fuel gas flow rate and LNG export volume was analyzed, and a comparison was made between the operating costs of SCV running independently and the combined SCV-ORV operation under winter conditions. The results of the combined operation experiments indicated that at a seawater inlet–outlet temperature difference of 3 °C, the joint operation mode could save costs by 70–77%; at 2.5 °C difference, it saves 60–67%; at 2 °C difference, it saves 45–50%; at 1.5 °C difference, it saves 35–38%; and at 1 °C difference, it saves 20–23%. This approach achieves optimized economic performance for LNG terminal operations.
format Article
id doaj-art-bb6c9593661049ae85e1cf3c8b862514
institution Kabale University
issn 1996-1073
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj-art-bb6c9593661049ae85e1cf3c8b8625142025-01-24T13:30:52ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732025-01-0118227610.3390/en18020276Simulation and Economic Benefit Analysis of Carburetor Combined Transport in Winter at a Liquefied Natural Gas Receiving StationSong Cao0Tao Luan1Pengliang Zuo2Xiaolei Si3Pu Xie4Yingjun Guo5School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050027, ChinaCaofeidian Xintian LNG Co., Ltd., Tangshan 063200, ChinaCaofeidian Xintian LNG Co., Ltd., Tangshan 063200, ChinaCaofeidian Xintian LNG Co., Ltd., Tangshan 063200, ChinaSchool of Information and Intelligent Engineering, Tianjin Renai College, Tianjin 301636, ChinaSchool of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050027, ChinaIn the winter, a certain LNG receiving terminal operates exclusively with the submerged combustion vaporizer (SCV). However, due to the high operational costs associated with the SCV, a new combined operation scheme utilizing both the SCV and the open rack vaporizer (ORV) has been proposed. First, models for the SCV and ORV gasification units were developed in Aspen HYSYS and validated using actual operational parameters. Next, the relationship between the seawater inlet–outlet temperature difference and the minimum seawater flow rate for the ORV was determined, and an optimized seawater pump operation strategy, considering LNG export volumes, was formulated. Additionally, the relationship between the SCV fuel gas flow rate and LNG export volume was analyzed, and a comparison was made between the operating costs of SCV running independently and the combined SCV-ORV operation under winter conditions. The results of the combined operation experiments indicated that at a seawater inlet–outlet temperature difference of 3 °C, the joint operation mode could save costs by 70–77%; at 2.5 °C difference, it saves 60–67%; at 2 °C difference, it saves 45–50%; at 1.5 °C difference, it saves 35–38%; and at 1 °C difference, it saves 20–23%. This approach achieves optimized economic performance for LNG terminal operations.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/2/276liquefied natural gasliquefied natural gasopen rack vaporizersubmerged combustion vaporizereconomic optimizationseawater flow optimization
spellingShingle Song Cao
Tao Luan
Pengliang Zuo
Xiaolei Si
Pu Xie
Yingjun Guo
Simulation and Economic Benefit Analysis of Carburetor Combined Transport in Winter at a Liquefied Natural Gas Receiving Station
Energies
liquefied natural gas
liquefied natural gas
open rack vaporizer
submerged combustion vaporizer
economic optimization
seawater flow optimization
title Simulation and Economic Benefit Analysis of Carburetor Combined Transport in Winter at a Liquefied Natural Gas Receiving Station
title_full Simulation and Economic Benefit Analysis of Carburetor Combined Transport in Winter at a Liquefied Natural Gas Receiving Station
title_fullStr Simulation and Economic Benefit Analysis of Carburetor Combined Transport in Winter at a Liquefied Natural Gas Receiving Station
title_full_unstemmed Simulation and Economic Benefit Analysis of Carburetor Combined Transport in Winter at a Liquefied Natural Gas Receiving Station
title_short Simulation and Economic Benefit Analysis of Carburetor Combined Transport in Winter at a Liquefied Natural Gas Receiving Station
title_sort simulation and economic benefit analysis of carburetor combined transport in winter at a liquefied natural gas receiving station
topic liquefied natural gas
liquefied natural gas
open rack vaporizer
submerged combustion vaporizer
economic optimization
seawater flow optimization
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/2/276
work_keys_str_mv AT songcao simulationandeconomicbenefitanalysisofcarburetorcombinedtransportinwinterataliquefiednaturalgasreceivingstation
AT taoluan simulationandeconomicbenefitanalysisofcarburetorcombinedtransportinwinterataliquefiednaturalgasreceivingstation
AT pengliangzuo simulationandeconomicbenefitanalysisofcarburetorcombinedtransportinwinterataliquefiednaturalgasreceivingstation
AT xiaoleisi simulationandeconomicbenefitanalysisofcarburetorcombinedtransportinwinterataliquefiednaturalgasreceivingstation
AT puxie simulationandeconomicbenefitanalysisofcarburetorcombinedtransportinwinterataliquefiednaturalgasreceivingstation
AT yingjunguo simulationandeconomicbenefitanalysisofcarburetorcombinedtransportinwinterataliquefiednaturalgasreceivingstation