Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation Analysis of Multi-Energy Complementary Off-Grid System Operation
In the future, China’s demand for centralized industrial development in remote areas will gradually increase, but the operation evaluation analysis of off-grid systems applicable to the development of such areas has not yet matured, and it is an urgent challenge to improve the operation mechanism of...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Energies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2159 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849312741108482048 |
|---|---|
| author | Yu Lei Xiaobin Yan Shenhao Yang Yu Fan Chao Ma Qingsong Li Yuanfeng Huang Wei Yang |
| author_facet | Yu Lei Xiaobin Yan Shenhao Yang Yu Fan Chao Ma Qingsong Li Yuanfeng Huang Wei Yang |
| author_sort | Yu Lei |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In the future, China’s demand for centralized industrial development in remote areas will gradually increase, but the operation evaluation analysis of off-grid systems applicable to the development of such areas has not yet matured, and it is an urgent challenge to improve the operation mechanism of off-grid systems and then conduct a comprehensive benefit evaluation of off-grid systems. First of all, this paper focuses on the problem that the existing dimensions of the benefit evaluation of multi-energy complementary off-grid systems are not refined and comprehensive enough, and takes into account their high safety and reliability requirements, as well as the potential impacts on local industries and people’s lives after their completion, and then constructs a more complete comprehensive benefit evaluation indicator system for multi-energy complementary off-grid systems. Secondly, the subjective and objective weighting method based on the combination of the AHP (analytic hierarchy process) and AEM (anti-entropy method) is used to assign weights to the evaluation indicators. Finally, based on the TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) comprehensive evaluation method, a comprehensive benefit evaluation of a multi-energy complementary off-grid system under different operation schemes is conducted, and the example results show that the size of the relative closeness under different operation schemes has a maximum difference of 0.5592, which verifies that the proposed evaluation indicator system and the multilevel evaluation method can comprehensively evaluate and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of multi-energy complementary off-grid systems under different operation schemes, and provide theoretical guidance and decision-making support for the further promotion and construction of multi-energy complementary off-grid systems. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-bb63a17ec67c44149ab098b99708f9b3 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1996-1073 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Energies |
| spelling | doaj-art-bb63a17ec67c44149ab098b99708f9b32025-08-20T03:52:57ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732025-04-01189215910.3390/en18092159Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation Analysis of Multi-Energy Complementary Off-Grid System OperationYu Lei0Xiaobin Yan1Shenhao Yang2Yu Fan3Chao Ma4Qingsong Li5Yuanfeng Huang6Wei Yang7Energy Planning and Research Institute, Southwest Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Chengdu 610500, ChinaEnergy Planning and Research Institute, Southwest Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Chengdu 610500, ChinaEnergy Planning and Research Institute, Southwest Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Chengdu 610500, ChinaEnergy Planning and Research Institute, Southwest Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Chengdu 610500, ChinaEnergy Planning and Research Institute, Southwest Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Chengdu 610500, ChinaSchool of Electrical and Information, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, ChinaSchool of Electrical and Information, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, ChinaSchool of Electrical and Information, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, ChinaIn the future, China’s demand for centralized industrial development in remote areas will gradually increase, but the operation evaluation analysis of off-grid systems applicable to the development of such areas has not yet matured, and it is an urgent challenge to improve the operation mechanism of off-grid systems and then conduct a comprehensive benefit evaluation of off-grid systems. First of all, this paper focuses on the problem that the existing dimensions of the benefit evaluation of multi-energy complementary off-grid systems are not refined and comprehensive enough, and takes into account their high safety and reliability requirements, as well as the potential impacts on local industries and people’s lives after their completion, and then constructs a more complete comprehensive benefit evaluation indicator system for multi-energy complementary off-grid systems. Secondly, the subjective and objective weighting method based on the combination of the AHP (analytic hierarchy process) and AEM (anti-entropy method) is used to assign weights to the evaluation indicators. Finally, based on the TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) comprehensive evaluation method, a comprehensive benefit evaluation of a multi-energy complementary off-grid system under different operation schemes is conducted, and the example results show that the size of the relative closeness under different operation schemes has a maximum difference of 0.5592, which verifies that the proposed evaluation indicator system and the multilevel evaluation method can comprehensively evaluate and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of multi-energy complementary off-grid systems under different operation schemes, and provide theoretical guidance and decision-making support for the further promotion and construction of multi-energy complementary off-grid systems.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2159multi-energy complementarityoff-grid systemsbenefit evaluationanalytic hierarchy processsubjective and objective weighting method |
| spellingShingle | Yu Lei Xiaobin Yan Shenhao Yang Yu Fan Chao Ma Qingsong Li Yuanfeng Huang Wei Yang Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation Analysis of Multi-Energy Complementary Off-Grid System Operation Energies multi-energy complementarity off-grid systems benefit evaluation analytic hierarchy process subjective and objective weighting method |
| title | Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation Analysis of Multi-Energy Complementary Off-Grid System Operation |
| title_full | Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation Analysis of Multi-Energy Complementary Off-Grid System Operation |
| title_fullStr | Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation Analysis of Multi-Energy Complementary Off-Grid System Operation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation Analysis of Multi-Energy Complementary Off-Grid System Operation |
| title_short | Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation Analysis of Multi-Energy Complementary Off-Grid System Operation |
| title_sort | comprehensive benefit evaluation analysis of multi energy complementary off grid system operation |
| topic | multi-energy complementarity off-grid systems benefit evaluation analytic hierarchy process subjective and objective weighting method |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2159 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yulei comprehensivebenefitevaluationanalysisofmultienergycomplementaryoffgridsystemoperation AT xiaobinyan comprehensivebenefitevaluationanalysisofmultienergycomplementaryoffgridsystemoperation AT shenhaoyang comprehensivebenefitevaluationanalysisofmultienergycomplementaryoffgridsystemoperation AT yufan comprehensivebenefitevaluationanalysisofmultienergycomplementaryoffgridsystemoperation AT chaoma comprehensivebenefitevaluationanalysisofmultienergycomplementaryoffgridsystemoperation AT qingsongli comprehensivebenefitevaluationanalysisofmultienergycomplementaryoffgridsystemoperation AT yuanfenghuang comprehensivebenefitevaluationanalysisofmultienergycomplementaryoffgridsystemoperation AT weiyang comprehensivebenefitevaluationanalysisofmultienergycomplementaryoffgridsystemoperation |