THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS FOR THE DRIVER OF THE COMBINED HARVESTER ON THE EFFICIENCY OF PERFORMANCE IN TERMS OF SOME FUNCTIONAL INDICATORS

A field study has been conducted during the Agricultural season (2013) in the governorate of Nineveh to study the operating conditions that surround the combined harvester driver during harvesting barley. These conditions; the degree of noise of and without an ear protector, different shifts three t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arkan Muhammed Ameen, Muhammed Toufeeq Authman, Mansour Mohammad Hani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: College of Agriculture 2018-06-01
Series:Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:https://magrj.mosuljournals.com/article_161465_2db1a921b33385d9382eb56052f5645c.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850038325241446400
author Arkan Muhammed Ameen
Muhammed Toufeeq Authman
Mansour Mohammad Hani
author_facet Arkan Muhammed Ameen
Muhammed Toufeeq Authman
Mansour Mohammad Hani
author_sort Arkan Muhammed Ameen
collection DOAJ
description A field study has been conducted during the Agricultural season (2013) in the governorate of Nineveh to study the operating conditions that surround the combined harvester driver during harvesting barley. These conditions; the degree of noise of and without an ear protector, different shifts three to five hours and different types of harvesters of conditioned environments type of the harvester john deer 2054 new-Holland Bizonz110 with unconditioned environments to the harvester john deer 80.The study aims at finding the best operating conditions and the less effective ones on surface side for harvester drivers and the effect of these conditions on the efficiency of production and the components of wastage in the harvest . The results showed that the Machinery indicators of the harvester john deer 2054 with noise and ear-protector and three-hour shift outperformed gave less value of Quantitative loss. Whereas, the non-ear protector harvester new-Holland and with five-hour shift showed higher productivity .Whereas the non-ear protector harvester new-Holland with noise and with five-hour shift showed higher efficiency of the harvester. The best results for the Health Indicators the non-ear protector harvester new-holland with noise and the three-hours shift showed outperformance in giving less absolute difference in the property of body temperature and blood sugar. In comparison, also the harvester john deer 2054 with noise and without using an ear-protector outperformed in giving higher absolute difference for pulse rate.
format Article
id doaj-art-bb5203dc235941bab609d42ce98009a3
institution DOAJ
issn 1815-316X
2224-9796
language English
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher College of Agriculture
record_format Article
series Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture
spelling doaj-art-bb5203dc235941bab609d42ce98009a32025-08-20T02:56:37ZengCollege of AgricultureMesopotamia Journal of Agriculture1815-316X2224-97962018-06-0146224826510.33899/magrj.2018.161465161465THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS FOR THE DRIVER OF THE COMBINED HARVESTER ON THE EFFICIENCY OF PERFORMANCE IN TERMS OF SOME FUNCTIONAL INDICATORSArkan Muhammed Ameen0Muhammed Toufeeq Authman1Mansour Mohammad Hani2Department of machinery and agricultural machinery College of Agriculture and Forestry University of MosulDepartment Aariyadah Education College of Basic Education University of MosulDepartment of machinery and agricultural machinery College of Agriculture and Forestry University of MosulA field study has been conducted during the Agricultural season (2013) in the governorate of Nineveh to study the operating conditions that surround the combined harvester driver during harvesting barley. These conditions; the degree of noise of and without an ear protector, different shifts three to five hours and different types of harvesters of conditioned environments type of the harvester john deer 2054 new-Holland Bizonz110 with unconditioned environments to the harvester john deer 80.The study aims at finding the best operating conditions and the less effective ones on surface side for harvester drivers and the effect of these conditions on the efficiency of production and the components of wastage in the harvest . The results showed that the Machinery indicators of the harvester john deer 2054 with noise and ear-protector and three-hour shift outperformed gave less value of Quantitative loss. Whereas, the non-ear protector harvester new-Holland and with five-hour shift showed higher productivity .Whereas the non-ear protector harvester new-Holland with noise and with five-hour shift showed higher efficiency of the harvester. The best results for the Health Indicators the non-ear protector harvester new-holland with noise and the three-hours shift showed outperformance in giving less absolute difference in the property of body temperature and blood sugar. In comparison, also the harvester john deer 2054 with noise and without using an ear-protector outperformed in giving higher absolute difference for pulse rate.https://magrj.mosuljournals.com/article_161465_2db1a921b33385d9382eb56052f5645c.pdfa field study has been conducted during the agricultural season (2013) in the governorate of nineveh to study the operating conditions that surround the combined harvester driver during harvesting barley. these conditionsthe degree of noise of and without an ear protector, different shifts three to five hours and different types of harvesters of conditioned environments type of the harvester john deer 2054 new-holland bizonz110 with unconditioned environments to the
spellingShingle Arkan Muhammed Ameen
Muhammed Toufeeq Authman
Mansour Mohammad Hani
THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS FOR THE DRIVER OF THE COMBINED HARVESTER ON THE EFFICIENCY OF PERFORMANCE IN TERMS OF SOME FUNCTIONAL INDICATORS
Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture
a field study has been conducted during the agricultural season (2013) in the governorate of nineveh to study the operating conditions that surround the combined harvester driver during harvesting barley. these conditions
the degree of noise of and without an ear protector, different shifts three to five hours and different types of harvesters of conditioned environments type of the harvester john deer 2054 new-holland bizonz110 with unconditioned environments to the
title THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS FOR THE DRIVER OF THE COMBINED HARVESTER ON THE EFFICIENCY OF PERFORMANCE IN TERMS OF SOME FUNCTIONAL INDICATORS
title_full THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS FOR THE DRIVER OF THE COMBINED HARVESTER ON THE EFFICIENCY OF PERFORMANCE IN TERMS OF SOME FUNCTIONAL INDICATORS
title_fullStr THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS FOR THE DRIVER OF THE COMBINED HARVESTER ON THE EFFICIENCY OF PERFORMANCE IN TERMS OF SOME FUNCTIONAL INDICATORS
title_full_unstemmed THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS FOR THE DRIVER OF THE COMBINED HARVESTER ON THE EFFICIENCY OF PERFORMANCE IN TERMS OF SOME FUNCTIONAL INDICATORS
title_short THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS FOR THE DRIVER OF THE COMBINED HARVESTER ON THE EFFICIENCY OF PERFORMANCE IN TERMS OF SOME FUNCTIONAL INDICATORS
title_sort effect of different operating conditions for the driver of the combined harvester on the efficiency of performance in terms of some functional indicators
topic a field study has been conducted during the agricultural season (2013) in the governorate of nineveh to study the operating conditions that surround the combined harvester driver during harvesting barley. these conditions
the degree of noise of and without an ear protector, different shifts three to five hours and different types of harvesters of conditioned environments type of the harvester john deer 2054 new-holland bizonz110 with unconditioned environments to the
url https://magrj.mosuljournals.com/article_161465_2db1a921b33385d9382eb56052f5645c.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT arkanmuhammedameen theeffectofdifferentoperatingconditionsforthedriverofthecombinedharvesterontheefficiencyofperformanceintermsofsomefunctionalindicators
AT muhammedtoufeeqauthman theeffectofdifferentoperatingconditionsforthedriverofthecombinedharvesterontheefficiencyofperformanceintermsofsomefunctionalindicators
AT mansourmohammadhani theeffectofdifferentoperatingconditionsforthedriverofthecombinedharvesterontheefficiencyofperformanceintermsofsomefunctionalindicators
AT arkanmuhammedameen effectofdifferentoperatingconditionsforthedriverofthecombinedharvesterontheefficiencyofperformanceintermsofsomefunctionalindicators
AT muhammedtoufeeqauthman effectofdifferentoperatingconditionsforthedriverofthecombinedharvesterontheefficiencyofperformanceintermsofsomefunctionalindicators
AT mansourmohammadhani effectofdifferentoperatingconditionsforthedriverofthecombinedharvesterontheefficiencyofperformanceintermsofsomefunctionalindicators