Real-Life Experiences with Telaprevir in the Treatment of Chronic Genotype 1 Hepatitis C — The TEPS Study

As one of the first Direct Acting Antivirals (DAA), the protease inhibitor Telaprevir (TVR) was available in the European Union from 9/2011 until 9/2016 as a new treatment option for chronic Hepatitis C.Aim. To assess the implementation of therapy stopping rules or shortening of the treatment and th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. Berg, P. Buggisch, D. Hueppe, S. Mauss, H. Wedemeyer, G. Teuber, T. Lutz, K. Stein, S. Wegner, H. Hinrichsen
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Gastro LLC 2019-01-01
Series:Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.gastro-j.ru/jour/article/view/295
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860156887203840
author T. Berg
P. Buggisch
D. Hueppe
S. Mauss
H. Wedemeyer
G. Teuber
T. Lutz
K. Stein
S. Wegner
H. Hinrichsen
author_facet T. Berg
P. Buggisch
D. Hueppe
S. Mauss
H. Wedemeyer
G. Teuber
T. Lutz
K. Stein
S. Wegner
H. Hinrichsen
author_sort T. Berg
collection DOAJ
description As one of the first Direct Acting Antivirals (DAA), the protease inhibitor Telaprevir (TVR) was available in the European Union from 9/2011 until 9/2016 as a new treatment option for chronic Hepatitis C.Aim. To assess the implementation of therapy stopping rules or shortening of the treatment and their impact on sustained virological response (SVR), as well as the safety and efficacy of the TVR-based therapy during routine daily treatment of patients in Germany.Materials and Methods. 802 patients were assessed (272 treatment naïve, 520 pre-treated) in the noninterventional, multi-center study.Results. 56.6 % of the patients achieved SVR. SVR rate was higher in patients with relapse after previous treatment (68.0 %) than in patients with a previous null-response (31.1 %) and in previously untreated patients (58.1 %). Stopping rule conditions were fulfilled by 3.2 % of patients and it was implemented in 65.4 % of these. 34.3 % of the patients fulfilled the conditions for a therapy shortening. This rule was adhered to in 48.4 % of these, in 34.5 % it was not adhered to. Thus recommendations were not always being followed. Therapy shortening was considered more frequently in previously untreated (54.8 %) than for previously treated patients (24.2 %). Stopping rule application but not shortened treatment reduced therapy costs.Conclusion. The TVR-based therapy represented a breakthrough at that time. Further DAAs have been added as therapeutic options since, increasing the complexity of treatment choice and correct implementation. They represent both an opportunity and a challenge for all those involved.As one of the first Direct Acting Antivirals (DAA), the protease inhibitor Telaprevir (TVR) was available in the European Union from 9/2011 until 9/2016 as a new treatment option for chronic Hepatitis C.Aim. To assess the implementation of therapy stopping rules or shortening of the treatment and their impact on sustained virological response (SVR), as well as the safety and efficacy of the TVR-based therapy during routine daily treatment of patients in Germany.Materials and Methods. 802 patients were assessed (272 treatment naïve, 520 pre-treated) in the noninterventional, multi-center study.Results. 56.6 % of the patients achieved SVR. SVR rate was higher in patients with relapse after previous treatment (68.0 %) than in patients with a previous null-response (31.1 %) and in previously untreated patients (58.1 %). Stopping rule conditions were fulfilled by 3.2 % of patients and it was implemented in 65.4 % of these. 34.3 % of the patients fulfilled the conditions for a therapy shortening. This rule was adhered to in 48.4 % of these, in 34.5 % it was not adhered to. Thus recommendations were not always being followed. Therapy shortening was considered more frequently in previously untreated (54.8 %) than for previously treated patients (24.2 %). Stopping rule application but not shortened treatment reduced therapy costs.Conclusion. The TVR-based therapy represented a breakthrough at that time. Further DAAs have been added as therapeutic options since, increasing the complexity of treatment choice and correct implementation. They represent both an opportunity and a challenge for all those involved.
format Article
id doaj-art-bb40dfa529964b6f85a65bcaf8a5ea10
institution Kabale University
issn 1382-4376
2658-6673
language Russian
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Gastro LLC
record_format Article
series Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии
spelling doaj-art-bb40dfa529964b6f85a65bcaf8a5ea102025-02-10T16:14:35ZrusGastro LLCРоссийский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии1382-43762658-66732019-01-01286152610.22416/1382-4376-2018-28-6-15-26273Real-Life Experiences with Telaprevir in the Treatment of Chronic Genotype 1 Hepatitis C — The TEPS StudyT. Berg0P. Buggisch1D. Hueppe2S. Mauss3H. Wedemeyer4G. Teuber5T. Lutz6K. Stein7S. Wegner8H. Hinrichsen9University Hospital Leipzig.Ifi-institute for Interdisciplinary Medicine.Center for Hepatogastroenterology.Center for HIV and Hepatogastroenterology.University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen.Practice for Gastroenterology and Hepatology.Infektiologikum Frankfurt.University Hospital of Magdeburg.Janssen-Cilag GmbH.Practice for Gastroenterology and Hepatology.As one of the first Direct Acting Antivirals (DAA), the protease inhibitor Telaprevir (TVR) was available in the European Union from 9/2011 until 9/2016 as a new treatment option for chronic Hepatitis C.Aim. To assess the implementation of therapy stopping rules or shortening of the treatment and their impact on sustained virological response (SVR), as well as the safety and efficacy of the TVR-based therapy during routine daily treatment of patients in Germany.Materials and Methods. 802 patients were assessed (272 treatment naïve, 520 pre-treated) in the noninterventional, multi-center study.Results. 56.6 % of the patients achieved SVR. SVR rate was higher in patients with relapse after previous treatment (68.0 %) than in patients with a previous null-response (31.1 %) and in previously untreated patients (58.1 %). Stopping rule conditions were fulfilled by 3.2 % of patients and it was implemented in 65.4 % of these. 34.3 % of the patients fulfilled the conditions for a therapy shortening. This rule was adhered to in 48.4 % of these, in 34.5 % it was not adhered to. Thus recommendations were not always being followed. Therapy shortening was considered more frequently in previously untreated (54.8 %) than for previously treated patients (24.2 %). Stopping rule application but not shortened treatment reduced therapy costs.Conclusion. The TVR-based therapy represented a breakthrough at that time. Further DAAs have been added as therapeutic options since, increasing the complexity of treatment choice and correct implementation. They represent both an opportunity and a challenge for all those involved.As one of the first Direct Acting Antivirals (DAA), the protease inhibitor Telaprevir (TVR) was available in the European Union from 9/2011 until 9/2016 as a new treatment option for chronic Hepatitis C.Aim. To assess the implementation of therapy stopping rules or shortening of the treatment and their impact on sustained virological response (SVR), as well as the safety and efficacy of the TVR-based therapy during routine daily treatment of patients in Germany.Materials and Methods. 802 patients were assessed (272 treatment naïve, 520 pre-treated) in the noninterventional, multi-center study.Results. 56.6 % of the patients achieved SVR. SVR rate was higher in patients with relapse after previous treatment (68.0 %) than in patients with a previous null-response (31.1 %) and in previously untreated patients (58.1 %). Stopping rule conditions were fulfilled by 3.2 % of patients and it was implemented in 65.4 % of these. 34.3 % of the patients fulfilled the conditions for a therapy shortening. This rule was adhered to in 48.4 % of these, in 34.5 % it was not adhered to. Thus recommendations were not always being followed. Therapy shortening was considered more frequently in previously untreated (54.8 %) than for previously treated patients (24.2 %). Stopping rule application but not shortened treatment reduced therapy costs.Conclusion. The TVR-based therapy represented a breakthrough at that time. Further DAAs have been added as therapeutic options since, increasing the complexity of treatment choice and correct implementation. They represent both an opportunity and a challenge for all those involved.https://www.gastro-j.ru/jour/article/view/295hepatitis cdirect acting antivirals (daa)stopping ruleshortening of treatmentsustained virological response (svr)
spellingShingle T. Berg
P. Buggisch
D. Hueppe
S. Mauss
H. Wedemeyer
G. Teuber
T. Lutz
K. Stein
S. Wegner
H. Hinrichsen
Real-Life Experiences with Telaprevir in the Treatment of Chronic Genotype 1 Hepatitis C — The TEPS Study
Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии
hepatitis c
direct acting antivirals (daa)
stopping rule
shortening of treatment
sustained virological response (svr)
title Real-Life Experiences with Telaprevir in the Treatment of Chronic Genotype 1 Hepatitis C — The TEPS Study
title_full Real-Life Experiences with Telaprevir in the Treatment of Chronic Genotype 1 Hepatitis C — The TEPS Study
title_fullStr Real-Life Experiences with Telaprevir in the Treatment of Chronic Genotype 1 Hepatitis C — The TEPS Study
title_full_unstemmed Real-Life Experiences with Telaprevir in the Treatment of Chronic Genotype 1 Hepatitis C — The TEPS Study
title_short Real-Life Experiences with Telaprevir in the Treatment of Chronic Genotype 1 Hepatitis C — The TEPS Study
title_sort real life experiences with telaprevir in the treatment of chronic genotype 1 hepatitis c the teps study
topic hepatitis c
direct acting antivirals (daa)
stopping rule
shortening of treatment
sustained virological response (svr)
url https://www.gastro-j.ru/jour/article/view/295
work_keys_str_mv AT tberg reallifeexperienceswithtelaprevirinthetreatmentofchronicgenotype1hepatitiscthetepsstudy
AT pbuggisch reallifeexperienceswithtelaprevirinthetreatmentofchronicgenotype1hepatitiscthetepsstudy
AT dhueppe reallifeexperienceswithtelaprevirinthetreatmentofchronicgenotype1hepatitiscthetepsstudy
AT smauss reallifeexperienceswithtelaprevirinthetreatmentofchronicgenotype1hepatitiscthetepsstudy
AT hwedemeyer reallifeexperienceswithtelaprevirinthetreatmentofchronicgenotype1hepatitiscthetepsstudy
AT gteuber reallifeexperienceswithtelaprevirinthetreatmentofchronicgenotype1hepatitiscthetepsstudy
AT tlutz reallifeexperienceswithtelaprevirinthetreatmentofchronicgenotype1hepatitiscthetepsstudy
AT kstein reallifeexperienceswithtelaprevirinthetreatmentofchronicgenotype1hepatitiscthetepsstudy
AT swegner reallifeexperienceswithtelaprevirinthetreatmentofchronicgenotype1hepatitiscthetepsstudy
AT hhinrichsen reallifeexperienceswithtelaprevirinthetreatmentofchronicgenotype1hepatitiscthetepsstudy