Determinants of long‐term paramagnetic rim lesion evolution in people with multiple sclerosis

Abstract Objective Baseline paramagnetic rim lesion (PRL) load predicts disease progression in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Understanding how PRLs relate to other known MS‐related factors, and the practical utility of PRLs in clinical trials, is crucial for informing clinical decision‐maki...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jack A. Reeves, Alexander Bartnik, Maryam Mohebbi, Murali Ramanathan, Niels Bergsland, Dejan Jakimovski, Gregory E. Wilding, Fahad Salman, Ferdinand Schweser, Bianca Weinstock‐Guttman, David Hojnacki, Svetlana Eckert, Francesca Bagnato, Michael G. Dwyer, Robert Zivadinov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-02-01
Series:Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.52253
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850145827220094976
author Jack A. Reeves
Alexander Bartnik
Maryam Mohebbi
Murali Ramanathan
Niels Bergsland
Dejan Jakimovski
Gregory E. Wilding
Fahad Salman
Ferdinand Schweser
Bianca Weinstock‐Guttman
David Hojnacki
Svetlana Eckert
Francesca Bagnato
Michael G. Dwyer
Robert Zivadinov
author_facet Jack A. Reeves
Alexander Bartnik
Maryam Mohebbi
Murali Ramanathan
Niels Bergsland
Dejan Jakimovski
Gregory E. Wilding
Fahad Salman
Ferdinand Schweser
Bianca Weinstock‐Guttman
David Hojnacki
Svetlana Eckert
Francesca Bagnato
Michael G. Dwyer
Robert Zivadinov
author_sort Jack A. Reeves
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective Baseline paramagnetic rim lesion (PRL) load predicts disease progression in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Understanding how PRLs relate to other known MS‐related factors, and the practical utility of PRLs in clinical trials, is crucial for informing clinical decision‐making and guiding development of novel disease‐modifying treatments (DMTs). Methods This study included 152 pwMS enrolled in a larger prospective, longitudinal cohort study who had 3T MRI scans and clinical assessments at baseline and 5‐ or 10‐year follow‐ups. PRLs were identified on baseline 3T quantitative susceptibility maps and classified as persisting, disappearing, or newly appearing at follow‐up. The relationships between PRL evolution and clinical, radiological, environmental, and genetic characteristics were assessed, and clinical trial sample sizes were estimated using PRL appearance or disappearance as outcome measures. Results DMT use was associated with lower odds of new PRL appearance (for high‐efficacy DMTs: odds ratio = 0.088, p = 0.024), but not disappearance. Current smoking status was associated with greater baseline PRL number (B = 0.527 additional PRLs, p = 0.013). A 24‐month clinical trial in people with progressive MS for a DMT that doubles the rate of PRL rim disappearance would require an estimated 118 people with progressive MS per group at 80% statistical power. Interpretation Early MS diagnosis and subsequent DMT initiation may reduce new chronic active inflammation. However, the utility of PRL disappearance or new PRL appearance as outcome measures in clinical trials is limited by potentially large sample sizes that are needed for moderate efficacy drugs.
format Article
id doaj-art-bb3bcbf310fc4db887472b21bd9afa1b
institution OA Journals
issn 2328-9503
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
spelling doaj-art-bb3bcbf310fc4db887472b21bd9afa1b2025-08-20T02:28:00ZengWileyAnnals of Clinical and Translational Neurology2328-95032025-02-0112226727910.1002/acn3.52253Determinants of long‐term paramagnetic rim lesion evolution in people with multiple sclerosisJack A. Reeves0Alexander Bartnik1Maryam Mohebbi2Murali Ramanathan3Niels Bergsland4Dejan Jakimovski5Gregory E. Wilding6Fahad Salman7Ferdinand Schweser8Bianca Weinstock‐Guttman9David Hojnacki10Svetlana Eckert11Francesca Bagnato12Michael G. Dwyer13Robert Zivadinov14Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo New York USABuffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo New York USABuffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo New York USADepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences State University of New York Buffalo New York USABuffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo New York USABuffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo New York USADepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Health Professions State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo New York USABuffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo New York USABuffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo New York USAJacobs Neurological Institute Buffalo New York USADepartment of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo New York USADepartment of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo New York USANeuroimaging Unit, Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USABuffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo New York USABuffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo New York USAAbstract Objective Baseline paramagnetic rim lesion (PRL) load predicts disease progression in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Understanding how PRLs relate to other known MS‐related factors, and the practical utility of PRLs in clinical trials, is crucial for informing clinical decision‐making and guiding development of novel disease‐modifying treatments (DMTs). Methods This study included 152 pwMS enrolled in a larger prospective, longitudinal cohort study who had 3T MRI scans and clinical assessments at baseline and 5‐ or 10‐year follow‐ups. PRLs were identified on baseline 3T quantitative susceptibility maps and classified as persisting, disappearing, or newly appearing at follow‐up. The relationships between PRL evolution and clinical, radiological, environmental, and genetic characteristics were assessed, and clinical trial sample sizes were estimated using PRL appearance or disappearance as outcome measures. Results DMT use was associated with lower odds of new PRL appearance (for high‐efficacy DMTs: odds ratio = 0.088, p = 0.024), but not disappearance. Current smoking status was associated with greater baseline PRL number (B = 0.527 additional PRLs, p = 0.013). A 24‐month clinical trial in people with progressive MS for a DMT that doubles the rate of PRL rim disappearance would require an estimated 118 people with progressive MS per group at 80% statistical power. Interpretation Early MS diagnosis and subsequent DMT initiation may reduce new chronic active inflammation. However, the utility of PRL disappearance or new PRL appearance as outcome measures in clinical trials is limited by potentially large sample sizes that are needed for moderate efficacy drugs.https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.52253
spellingShingle Jack A. Reeves
Alexander Bartnik
Maryam Mohebbi
Murali Ramanathan
Niels Bergsland
Dejan Jakimovski
Gregory E. Wilding
Fahad Salman
Ferdinand Schweser
Bianca Weinstock‐Guttman
David Hojnacki
Svetlana Eckert
Francesca Bagnato
Michael G. Dwyer
Robert Zivadinov
Determinants of long‐term paramagnetic rim lesion evolution in people with multiple sclerosis
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
title Determinants of long‐term paramagnetic rim lesion evolution in people with multiple sclerosis
title_full Determinants of long‐term paramagnetic rim lesion evolution in people with multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr Determinants of long‐term paramagnetic rim lesion evolution in people with multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of long‐term paramagnetic rim lesion evolution in people with multiple sclerosis
title_short Determinants of long‐term paramagnetic rim lesion evolution in people with multiple sclerosis
title_sort determinants of long term paramagnetic rim lesion evolution in people with multiple sclerosis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.52253
work_keys_str_mv AT jackareeves determinantsoflongtermparamagneticrimlesionevolutioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT alexanderbartnik determinantsoflongtermparamagneticrimlesionevolutioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT maryammohebbi determinantsoflongtermparamagneticrimlesionevolutioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT muraliramanathan determinantsoflongtermparamagneticrimlesionevolutioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT nielsbergsland determinantsoflongtermparamagneticrimlesionevolutioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT dejanjakimovski determinantsoflongtermparamagneticrimlesionevolutioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT gregoryewilding determinantsoflongtermparamagneticrimlesionevolutioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT fahadsalman determinantsoflongtermparamagneticrimlesionevolutioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT ferdinandschweser determinantsoflongtermparamagneticrimlesionevolutioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT biancaweinstockguttman determinantsoflongtermparamagneticrimlesionevolutioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT davidhojnacki determinantsoflongtermparamagneticrimlesionevolutioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT svetlanaeckert determinantsoflongtermparamagneticrimlesionevolutioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT francescabagnato determinantsoflongtermparamagneticrimlesionevolutioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT michaelgdwyer determinantsoflongtermparamagneticrimlesionevolutioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT robertzivadinov determinantsoflongtermparamagneticrimlesionevolutioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis