A comparative analysis of the impact of different treatments on Luffa Cylindrica fiber tensile properties.

In recent years, there has been a growing demand for environmentally friendly materials as alternatives to synthetic fibers, which pose significant environmental hazards due to their non-biodegradability. Natural fibers, such as Luffa Cylindrica, have gained attention due to their sustainability, li...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rania Saadeh, Ayman A Dawod, Ibrahim Mahariq, Ahmad Qazza, Abdelkader Khentout, Mohamed Kezzar, Mohamed Rafik Sari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325237
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849387579263156224
author Rania Saadeh
Ayman A Dawod
Ibrahim Mahariq
Ahmad Qazza
Abdelkader Khentout
Mohamed Kezzar
Mohamed Rafik Sari
author_facet Rania Saadeh
Ayman A Dawod
Ibrahim Mahariq
Ahmad Qazza
Abdelkader Khentout
Mohamed Kezzar
Mohamed Rafik Sari
author_sort Rania Saadeh
collection DOAJ
description In recent years, there has been a growing demand for environmentally friendly materials as alternatives to synthetic fibers, which pose significant environmental hazards due to their non-biodegradability. Natural fibers, such as Luffa Cylindrica, have gained attention due to their sustainability, lightweight properties, and biodegradability. However, their poor mechanical performance in composite applications limits their widespread use. The novelty of this study lies in the exploration of various treatments aimed at improving the tensile properties of Luffa Cylindrica fibers (LCFs), a relatively under-explored natural fiber. The research investigates the effects of immersion treatments in mineral water, seawater, vinegar (CH₃COOH), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO₃), and ethanol (C₂H₆O) on the tensile strength, surface morphology, and absorption properties of these fibers. The study highlights that untreated LCFs exhibit superior tensile strength (5.59 MPa) compared to treated fibers. Additionally, the statistical analysis utilizing two-parameter Weibull distribution offers novel insights into the mechanical properties of treated LCFs, confirming significant variations in fiber behavior with different treatments. This study contributes to the understanding of surface modifications that enhance the performance of Luffa Cylindrica fibers in composite materials, a promising step towards their industrial application.
format Article
id doaj-art-bb3216214bd445349a1c29fd8fd49a9b
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-bb3216214bd445349a1c29fd8fd49a9b2025-08-20T03:51:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01207e032523710.1371/journal.pone.0325237A comparative analysis of the impact of different treatments on Luffa Cylindrica fiber tensile properties.Rania SaadehAyman A DawodIbrahim MahariqAhmad QazzaAbdelkader KhentoutMohamed KezzarMohamed Rafik SariIn recent years, there has been a growing demand for environmentally friendly materials as alternatives to synthetic fibers, which pose significant environmental hazards due to their non-biodegradability. Natural fibers, such as Luffa Cylindrica, have gained attention due to their sustainability, lightweight properties, and biodegradability. However, their poor mechanical performance in composite applications limits their widespread use. The novelty of this study lies in the exploration of various treatments aimed at improving the tensile properties of Luffa Cylindrica fibers (LCFs), a relatively under-explored natural fiber. The research investigates the effects of immersion treatments in mineral water, seawater, vinegar (CH₃COOH), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO₃), and ethanol (C₂H₆O) on the tensile strength, surface morphology, and absorption properties of these fibers. The study highlights that untreated LCFs exhibit superior tensile strength (5.59 MPa) compared to treated fibers. Additionally, the statistical analysis utilizing two-parameter Weibull distribution offers novel insights into the mechanical properties of treated LCFs, confirming significant variations in fiber behavior with different treatments. This study contributes to the understanding of surface modifications that enhance the performance of Luffa Cylindrica fibers in composite materials, a promising step towards their industrial application.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325237
spellingShingle Rania Saadeh
Ayman A Dawod
Ibrahim Mahariq
Ahmad Qazza
Abdelkader Khentout
Mohamed Kezzar
Mohamed Rafik Sari
A comparative analysis of the impact of different treatments on Luffa Cylindrica fiber tensile properties.
PLoS ONE
title A comparative analysis of the impact of different treatments on Luffa Cylindrica fiber tensile properties.
title_full A comparative analysis of the impact of different treatments on Luffa Cylindrica fiber tensile properties.
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of the impact of different treatments on Luffa Cylindrica fiber tensile properties.
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of the impact of different treatments on Luffa Cylindrica fiber tensile properties.
title_short A comparative analysis of the impact of different treatments on Luffa Cylindrica fiber tensile properties.
title_sort comparative analysis of the impact of different treatments on luffa cylindrica fiber tensile properties
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325237
work_keys_str_mv AT raniasaadeh acomparativeanalysisoftheimpactofdifferenttreatmentsonluffacylindricafibertensileproperties
AT aymanadawod acomparativeanalysisoftheimpactofdifferenttreatmentsonluffacylindricafibertensileproperties
AT ibrahimmahariq acomparativeanalysisoftheimpactofdifferenttreatmentsonluffacylindricafibertensileproperties
AT ahmadqazza acomparativeanalysisoftheimpactofdifferenttreatmentsonluffacylindricafibertensileproperties
AT abdelkaderkhentout acomparativeanalysisoftheimpactofdifferenttreatmentsonluffacylindricafibertensileproperties
AT mohamedkezzar acomparativeanalysisoftheimpactofdifferenttreatmentsonluffacylindricafibertensileproperties
AT mohamedrafiksari acomparativeanalysisoftheimpactofdifferenttreatmentsonluffacylindricafibertensileproperties
AT raniasaadeh comparativeanalysisoftheimpactofdifferenttreatmentsonluffacylindricafibertensileproperties
AT aymanadawod comparativeanalysisoftheimpactofdifferenttreatmentsonluffacylindricafibertensileproperties
AT ibrahimmahariq comparativeanalysisoftheimpactofdifferenttreatmentsonluffacylindricafibertensileproperties
AT ahmadqazza comparativeanalysisoftheimpactofdifferenttreatmentsonluffacylindricafibertensileproperties
AT abdelkaderkhentout comparativeanalysisoftheimpactofdifferenttreatmentsonluffacylindricafibertensileproperties
AT mohamedkezzar comparativeanalysisoftheimpactofdifferenttreatmentsonluffacylindricafibertensileproperties
AT mohamedrafiksari comparativeanalysisoftheimpactofdifferenttreatmentsonluffacylindricafibertensileproperties