ETHICS AND ETIQUETTE

The article attempts to differentiate and even contrast the two different models of moral thinking and behavior. One of them considered morality as strict and even rigorist following etiquette - rules, rituals, commandments, laws, canons. Breach of the etiquette or neglecting it is considered unethi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. A. Nekrasova, F. A. Trigubenko
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation 2016-11-01
Series:Научный вестник МГТУ ГА
Subjects:
Online Access:https://avia.mstuca.ru/jour/article/view/430
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850028339840942080
author N. A. Nekrasova
F. A. Trigubenko
author_facet N. A. Nekrasova
F. A. Trigubenko
author_sort N. A. Nekrasova
collection DOAJ
description The article attempts to differentiate and even contrast the two different models of moral thinking and behavior. One of them considered morality as strict and even rigorist following etiquette - rules, rituals, commandments, laws, canons. Breach of the etiquette or neglecting it is considered unethical, a manifestation of immorality, wickedness. Thus, etiquette and morality are identified. Such a conception of morality results from the ethical paradigm of Aristotle. But there is another, opposite paradigm - the ethics of Kant, in which morality is understood not as a form of behavior, but as an ontological entity. And in this (Kantian) moral paradigm etiquette has only to a service value.
format Article
id doaj-art-bb25e9becec54eaf9c9410839e5036a2
institution DOAJ
issn 2079-0619
2542-0119
language Russian
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation
record_format Article
series Научный вестник МГТУ ГА
spelling doaj-art-bb25e9becec54eaf9c9410839e5036a22025-08-20T02:59:50ZrusMoscow State Technical University of Civil AviationНаучный вестник МГТУ ГА2079-06192542-01192016-11-0121599104430ETHICS AND ETIQUETTEN. A. Nekrasova0F. A. Trigubenko1МГУПС (МИИТ)МГУПС (МИИТ)The article attempts to differentiate and even contrast the two different models of moral thinking and behavior. One of them considered morality as strict and even rigorist following etiquette - rules, rituals, commandments, laws, canons. Breach of the etiquette or neglecting it is considered unethical, a manifestation of immorality, wickedness. Thus, etiquette and morality are identified. Such a conception of morality results from the ethical paradigm of Aristotle. But there is another, opposite paradigm - the ethics of Kant, in which morality is understood not as a form of behavior, but as an ontological entity. And in this (Kantian) moral paradigm etiquette has only to a service value.https://avia.mstuca.ru/jour/article/view/430ethicsetiquettemoralityethicsethosfusesmindmetaphysicsformal logicgolden rulethe categorical imperativeobjective means eudemonismthe moral law
spellingShingle N. A. Nekrasova
F. A. Trigubenko
ETHICS AND ETIQUETTE
Научный вестник МГТУ ГА
ethics
etiquette
morality
ethics
ethos
fuses
mind
metaphysics
formal logic
golden rule
the categorical imperative
objective means eudemonism
the moral law
title ETHICS AND ETIQUETTE
title_full ETHICS AND ETIQUETTE
title_fullStr ETHICS AND ETIQUETTE
title_full_unstemmed ETHICS AND ETIQUETTE
title_short ETHICS AND ETIQUETTE
title_sort ethics and etiquette
topic ethics
etiquette
morality
ethics
ethos
fuses
mind
metaphysics
formal logic
golden rule
the categorical imperative
objective means eudemonism
the moral law
url https://avia.mstuca.ru/jour/article/view/430
work_keys_str_mv AT nanekrasova ethicsandetiquette
AT fatrigubenko ethicsandetiquette