Dynamics in pre-service teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism and linguistic diversity in education: a Q methodology intervention study

This study addresses the structural challenges multilingual students face in predominantly monolingual school systems and the role of teachers in integrating students’ full linguistic repertoires. Promoting such inclusive practices requires specific professional beliefs, which have increasingly come...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Denis Weger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2025-12-01
Series:Cogent Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2533611
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850067716226940928
author Denis Weger
author_facet Denis Weger
author_sort Denis Weger
collection DOAJ
description This study addresses the structural challenges multilingual students face in predominantly monolingual school systems and the role of teachers in integrating students’ full linguistic repertoires. Promoting such inclusive practices requires specific professional beliefs, which have increasingly come into focus in teacher education research in recent years. Traditional methods like Likert-based surveys are prone to socially desirable responses and often fail to capture the interconnected nature of beliefs. To address these limitations, this study applies Q methodology–an approach combining qualitative and quantitative elements–in a pre/post design to offer a more nuanced view of belief structures and their development. Thirty pre-service teachers participated in a course on multilingualism and sorted 30 statements in a forced-choice distribution. The analysis revealed a shift from predominantly positive to uniformly positive beliefs. Monolingual perspectives present in the pre-test disappeared post-course, replaced by more inclusive views that occasionally included seemingly contradictory elements, nuances often overlooked by conventional methods. The findings highlight Q methodology’s potential to uncover the complexity of teacher beliefs while reducing response bias. They also underscore the value of teacher education programs that explicitly address multilingualism and the role of the language of schooling in fostering more inclusive beliefs among future teachers.
format Article
id doaj-art-bb09adc1928a466cb8f94277ecd5fdf9
institution DOAJ
issn 2331-186X
language English
publishDate 2025-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Cogent Education
spelling doaj-art-bb09adc1928a466cb8f94277ecd5fdf92025-08-20T02:48:13ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Education2331-186X2025-12-0112110.1080/2331186X.2025.2533611Dynamics in pre-service teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism and linguistic diversity in education: a Q methodology intervention studyDenis Weger0University of Vienna, Centre for Teacher Education, Language Teaching and Learning Research Unit, Vienna, AustriaThis study addresses the structural challenges multilingual students face in predominantly monolingual school systems and the role of teachers in integrating students’ full linguistic repertoires. Promoting such inclusive practices requires specific professional beliefs, which have increasingly come into focus in teacher education research in recent years. Traditional methods like Likert-based surveys are prone to socially desirable responses and often fail to capture the interconnected nature of beliefs. To address these limitations, this study applies Q methodology–an approach combining qualitative and quantitative elements–in a pre/post design to offer a more nuanced view of belief structures and their development. Thirty pre-service teachers participated in a course on multilingualism and sorted 30 statements in a forced-choice distribution. The analysis revealed a shift from predominantly positive to uniformly positive beliefs. Monolingual perspectives present in the pre-test disappeared post-course, replaced by more inclusive views that occasionally included seemingly contradictory elements, nuances often overlooked by conventional methods. The findings highlight Q methodology’s potential to uncover the complexity of teacher beliefs while reducing response bias. They also underscore the value of teacher education programs that explicitly address multilingualism and the role of the language of schooling in fostering more inclusive beliefs among future teachers.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2533611Pre-service teacher educationbeliefsmultilingualismQ methodologyintervention studyTeachers & Teacher Education
spellingShingle Denis Weger
Dynamics in pre-service teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism and linguistic diversity in education: a Q methodology intervention study
Cogent Education
Pre-service teacher education
beliefs
multilingualism
Q methodology
intervention study
Teachers & Teacher Education
title Dynamics in pre-service teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism and linguistic diversity in education: a Q methodology intervention study
title_full Dynamics in pre-service teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism and linguistic diversity in education: a Q methodology intervention study
title_fullStr Dynamics in pre-service teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism and linguistic diversity in education: a Q methodology intervention study
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics in pre-service teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism and linguistic diversity in education: a Q methodology intervention study
title_short Dynamics in pre-service teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism and linguistic diversity in education: a Q methodology intervention study
title_sort dynamics in pre service teachers beliefs about multilingualism and linguistic diversity in education a q methodology intervention study
topic Pre-service teacher education
beliefs
multilingualism
Q methodology
intervention study
Teachers & Teacher Education
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2533611
work_keys_str_mv AT denisweger dynamicsinpreserviceteachersbeliefsaboutmultilingualismandlinguisticdiversityineducationaqmethodologyinterventionstudy