La non-réciprocité d’un tiers induit la méfiance chez les singes capucins

Recent studies have established that some species of primates are able to detect reciprocity and non-reciprocity in the context of exchanges of objects between third parties. For example, we have shown that capuchin monkeys discriminate between a human actor who exchanges equitably with a third part...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James R Anderson, Benoit Bucher, Margaux Levasseur, Kazuo Fujita
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Société Francophone de Primatologie 2016-01-01
Series:Revue de Primatologie
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/primatologie/2402
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832581631305580544
author James R Anderson
Benoit Bucher
Margaux Levasseur
Kazuo Fujita
author_facet James R Anderson
Benoit Bucher
Margaux Levasseur
Kazuo Fujita
author_sort James R Anderson
collection DOAJ
description Recent studies have established that some species of primates are able to detect reciprocity and non-reciprocity in the context of exchanges of objects between third parties. For example, we have shown that capuchin monkeys discriminate between a human actor who exchanges equitably with a third party and an actor who does not respect reciprocity of exchange. More specifically, monkeys were significantly less willing to accept food from the non-reciprocator. In other words, the monkeys took a binary decision to engage preferentially with one actor at the expense of the other. In a new study, we asked whether monkeys would differentially trust two actors depending on the degree of reciprocity shown by the latter. Following a fair or an unfair exchange, one of the two actors started to transfer pieces of food to within reach of the monkey. In this situation of delay of gratification, the monkey can start to eat the food whenever it desires, but doing so stops the transfer; thus to maximize the amount of food obtained the monkey should wait and let the number of food items accumulate. Results showed that the monkeys were less likely to show delay of gratification when the food was transferred by an actor who behaved non-reciprocally in the exchange with a third party. This tendency towards “impulsive” responding was especially evident when the total quantity of food potentially available was unknown to the monkey, in other words, in a situation of uncertainty. We conclude from these data that non-reciprocity in a third-party exchange can induce a reaction of distrust in capuchin monkeys.
format Article
id doaj-art-bac0f6c4d49b4cdc919c5b520715966c
institution Kabale University
issn 2077-3757
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Société Francophone de Primatologie
record_format Article
series Revue de Primatologie
spelling doaj-art-bac0f6c4d49b4cdc919c5b520715966c2025-01-30T10:02:32ZengSociété Francophone de PrimatologieRevue de Primatologie2077-37572016-01-01610.4000/primatologie.2402La non-réciprocité d’un tiers induit la méfiance chez les singes capucinsJames R AndersonBenoit BucherMargaux LevasseurKazuo FujitaRecent studies have established that some species of primates are able to detect reciprocity and non-reciprocity in the context of exchanges of objects between third parties. For example, we have shown that capuchin monkeys discriminate between a human actor who exchanges equitably with a third party and an actor who does not respect reciprocity of exchange. More specifically, monkeys were significantly less willing to accept food from the non-reciprocator. In other words, the monkeys took a binary decision to engage preferentially with one actor at the expense of the other. In a new study, we asked whether monkeys would differentially trust two actors depending on the degree of reciprocity shown by the latter. Following a fair or an unfair exchange, one of the two actors started to transfer pieces of food to within reach of the monkey. In this situation of delay of gratification, the monkey can start to eat the food whenever it desires, but doing so stops the transfer; thus to maximize the amount of food obtained the monkey should wait and let the number of food items accumulate. Results showed that the monkeys were less likely to show delay of gratification when the food was transferred by an actor who behaved non-reciprocally in the exchange with a third party. This tendency towards “impulsive” responding was especially evident when the total quantity of food potentially available was unknown to the monkey, in other words, in a situation of uncertainty. We conclude from these data that non-reciprocity in a third-party exchange can induce a reaction of distrust in capuchin monkeys.https://journals.openedition.org/primatologie/2402capuchin monkeysexchangereciprocitytrustdistrustsocial evaluation
spellingShingle James R Anderson
Benoit Bucher
Margaux Levasseur
Kazuo Fujita
La non-réciprocité d’un tiers induit la méfiance chez les singes capucins
Revue de Primatologie
capuchin monkeys
exchange
reciprocity
trust
distrust
social evaluation
title La non-réciprocité d’un tiers induit la méfiance chez les singes capucins
title_full La non-réciprocité d’un tiers induit la méfiance chez les singes capucins
title_fullStr La non-réciprocité d’un tiers induit la méfiance chez les singes capucins
title_full_unstemmed La non-réciprocité d’un tiers induit la méfiance chez les singes capucins
title_short La non-réciprocité d’un tiers induit la méfiance chez les singes capucins
title_sort la non reciprocite d un tiers induit la mefiance chez les singes capucins
topic capuchin monkeys
exchange
reciprocity
trust
distrust
social evaluation
url https://journals.openedition.org/primatologie/2402
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesranderson lanonreciprociteduntiersinduitlamefiancechezlessingescapucins
AT benoitbucher lanonreciprociteduntiersinduitlamefiancechezlessingescapucins
AT margauxlevasseur lanonreciprociteduntiersinduitlamefiancechezlessingescapucins
AT kazuofujita lanonreciprociteduntiersinduitlamefiancechezlessingescapucins