Maize Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Informed by Space-per-Plant Geometry

Maize planting configuration remains a critical area for increased understanding and optimization, particularly in the context of advancing yield potential and management technologies. A field experiment was conducted in Tifton, Georgia in 2018 to characterize the grain yield and yield components re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reagan Noland, Michasia Dowdy, Glendon Harris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/2/374
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849723157920874496
author Reagan Noland
Michasia Dowdy
Glendon Harris
author_facet Reagan Noland
Michasia Dowdy
Glendon Harris
author_sort Reagan Noland
collection DOAJ
description Maize planting configuration remains a critical area for increased understanding and optimization, particularly in the context of advancing yield potential and management technologies. A field experiment was conducted in Tifton, Georgia in 2018 to characterize the grain yield and yield components relative to comprehensive ranges of row spacings and seeding rates and to explore the potential merit of alternative parameterizations of space per plant. Treatments comprised a complete factorial arrangement of four row spacings (38, 51, 76, and 91 cm) and four seeding rates (6.9, 8.4, 9.9, and 11.4 seeds m<sup>−2</sup>). Additional metrics evaluated were an inter-plant distance (IPD) and a measure of squareness (SQ) of space per plant. The narrowest row spacing (38 cm) resulted in greater (<i>p</i> < 0.05) ear density and grain yields (8.74 ears m<sup>−2</sup> and 16.3 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) than 76 and 91 cm rows (means = 7.90 m<sup>−2</sup> and 14.3 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) across seeding rates. Increasing the seeding rate also increased ear density and decreased kernels row<sup>−1</sup>, but did not affect the yield. Among all parameters assessed, the IPD and SQ were most influential on both ear density and the ultimate grain yield, indicating positive yield associations not only with crowdedness (greater density), but also with maximum squareness (or balance) of space per plant. These findings warrant continued experimentation and careful integration of reduced maize row spacing in high-yield environments.
format Article
id doaj-art-bab3b0d8af884e34b987e3465ae23fc6
institution DOAJ
issn 2073-4395
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj-art-bab3b0d8af884e34b987e3465ae23fc62025-08-20T03:11:06ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952025-01-0115237410.3390/agronomy15020374Maize Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Informed by Space-per-Plant GeometryReagan Noland0Michasia Dowdy1Glendon Harris2Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, 7887 U.S. Hwy 87 North, San Angelo, TX 76901, USAUniversity of Georgia Cooperative Extension, 400 East Courtland Ave, Quitman, GA 31643, USAUniversity of Georgia, 104 Research Way, Tifton, GA 31793, USAMaize planting configuration remains a critical area for increased understanding and optimization, particularly in the context of advancing yield potential and management technologies. A field experiment was conducted in Tifton, Georgia in 2018 to characterize the grain yield and yield components relative to comprehensive ranges of row spacings and seeding rates and to explore the potential merit of alternative parameterizations of space per plant. Treatments comprised a complete factorial arrangement of four row spacings (38, 51, 76, and 91 cm) and four seeding rates (6.9, 8.4, 9.9, and 11.4 seeds m<sup>−2</sup>). Additional metrics evaluated were an inter-plant distance (IPD) and a measure of squareness (SQ) of space per plant. The narrowest row spacing (38 cm) resulted in greater (<i>p</i> < 0.05) ear density and grain yields (8.74 ears m<sup>−2</sup> and 16.3 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) than 76 and 91 cm rows (means = 7.90 m<sup>−2</sup> and 14.3 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) across seeding rates. Increasing the seeding rate also increased ear density and decreased kernels row<sup>−1</sup>, but did not affect the yield. Among all parameters assessed, the IPD and SQ were most influential on both ear density and the ultimate grain yield, indicating positive yield associations not only with crowdedness (greater density), but also with maximum squareness (or balance) of space per plant. These findings warrant continued experimentation and careful integration of reduced maize row spacing in high-yield environments.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/2/374<i>Zea mays</i>plant densityyield componentsplanting arrangement
spellingShingle Reagan Noland
Michasia Dowdy
Glendon Harris
Maize Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Informed by Space-per-Plant Geometry
Agronomy
<i>Zea mays</i>
plant density
yield components
planting arrangement
title Maize Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Informed by Space-per-Plant Geometry
title_full Maize Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Informed by Space-per-Plant Geometry
title_fullStr Maize Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Informed by Space-per-Plant Geometry
title_full_unstemmed Maize Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Informed by Space-per-Plant Geometry
title_short Maize Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Informed by Space-per-Plant Geometry
title_sort maize row spacing and seeding rate informed by space per plant geometry
topic <i>Zea mays</i>
plant density
yield components
planting arrangement
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/2/374
work_keys_str_mv AT reagannoland maizerowspacingandseedingrateinformedbyspaceperplantgeometry
AT michasiadowdy maizerowspacingandseedingrateinformedbyspaceperplantgeometry
AT glendonharris maizerowspacingandseedingrateinformedbyspaceperplantgeometry