Revenge

This paper discusses, in a preliminary manner, what revenge is. (It does not address the rationality or moral standing of revenge.) In particular, it proposes four elements of revenge —an agent, a recipient, a harm intended by the former, and a harm done by the latter which provokes the revenge. Ba...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robert J. Stainton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) 2018-12-01
Series:Crítica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/464
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper discusses, in a preliminary manner, what revenge is. (It does not address the rationality or moral standing of revenge.) In particular, it proposes four elements of revenge —an agent, a recipient, a harm intended by the former, and a harm done by the latter which provokes the revenge. Based on these four elements, it highlights both agent-internal conditions for getting revenge, and agentexternal ones. Along the way, the paper contrasts revenge with related phenomena like merely getting even, and retribution.
ISSN:0011-1503
1870-4905