Assisted reproductive technology and association with childhood cancer subtypes

Abstract Objectives To investigate the association between assisted reproductive technology (ART) use and childhood cancer subtype. Study Design We deployed a cross‐sectional survey of 1701 parents of children with cancer about their ART use, demographics, and gestational and perinatal factors. Mult...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natalie B. Gulrajani, Samuel Montes, Daniel McGough, Courtney E. Wimberly, Ameera Khattab, Eleanor C. Semmes, Lisa Towry, Jennifer L. Cohen, Jillian H. Hurst, Daniel Landi, Sherika N. Hill, Kyle M. Walsh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-02-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5114
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846157621111816192
author Natalie B. Gulrajani
Samuel Montes
Daniel McGough
Courtney E. Wimberly
Ameera Khattab
Eleanor C. Semmes
Lisa Towry
Jennifer L. Cohen
Jillian H. Hurst
Daniel Landi
Sherika N. Hill
Kyle M. Walsh
author_facet Natalie B. Gulrajani
Samuel Montes
Daniel McGough
Courtney E. Wimberly
Ameera Khattab
Eleanor C. Semmes
Lisa Towry
Jennifer L. Cohen
Jillian H. Hurst
Daniel Landi
Sherika N. Hill
Kyle M. Walsh
author_sort Natalie B. Gulrajani
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives To investigate the association between assisted reproductive technology (ART) use and childhood cancer subtype. Study Design We deployed a cross‐sectional survey of 1701 parents of children with cancer about their ART use, demographics, and gestational and perinatal factors. Multivariable logistic regression modeled the association between ART use, birthweight and multiple gestation status with childhood cancer, by subtype. Results ART use was highest among children with osteosarcoma relative to children with other cancer types, and this association was statistically significant in multivariable models (OR = 4.4; 95% CI = 1.7–11.3; p = 0.0020). ART use was also elevated among children with hepatoblastoma, but this relationship appeared to be due to the strong associations between ART use and lower birthweight in our sample. No specific ART modality appeared to drive these associations. In univariate models, multiple gestation was associated with a 2.7‐fold increased odds of hepatoblastoma (OR = 2.71; 95% CI = 1.14–6.42; p = 0.02) and a 1.6‐fold increased odds of neuroblastoma (OR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.03–2.54; p = 0.03), but these associations were not retained in multivariable models. Conclusions Associations between ART use and hepatoblastoma risk may be attributable to birthweight, a known hepatoblastoma risk factor. ART use may also be associated with osteosarcoma, independent of birthweight, an association not previously observed in studies limited to cancers diagnosed before adolescence. Evaluating long‐term health outcomes in children conceived by ART, throughout adolescence and potentially into adulthood, appears warranted.
format Article
id doaj-art-ba922fa4b95b4b92a59ff2606f8deb5d
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-7634
language English
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj-art-ba922fa4b95b4b92a59ff2606f8deb5d2024-11-25T07:56:32ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342023-02-011233410341810.1002/cam4.5114Assisted reproductive technology and association with childhood cancer subtypesNatalie B. Gulrajani0Samuel Montes1Daniel McGough2Courtney E. Wimberly3Ameera Khattab4Eleanor C. Semmes5Lisa Towry6Jennifer L. Cohen7Jillian H. Hurst8Daniel Landi9Sherika N. Hill10Kyle M. Walsh11Children's Health and Discovery Institute, Department of Pediatrics Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USAMaster of Biomedical Sciences Program Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USAMaster of Biomedical Sciences Program Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USADepartment of Neurosurgery and Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USAMaster of Biomedical Sciences Program Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USAChildren's Health and Discovery Institute, Department of Pediatrics Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USAMy Childhood Cancer Program Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation Bala Cynwyd Pennsylvania USADivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USAChildren's Health and Discovery Institute, Department of Pediatrics Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USADepartment of Neurosurgery and Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USAChildren's Health and Discovery Institute, Department of Pediatrics Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USAChildren's Health and Discovery Institute, Department of Pediatrics Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USAAbstract Objectives To investigate the association between assisted reproductive technology (ART) use and childhood cancer subtype. Study Design We deployed a cross‐sectional survey of 1701 parents of children with cancer about their ART use, demographics, and gestational and perinatal factors. Multivariable logistic regression modeled the association between ART use, birthweight and multiple gestation status with childhood cancer, by subtype. Results ART use was highest among children with osteosarcoma relative to children with other cancer types, and this association was statistically significant in multivariable models (OR = 4.4; 95% CI = 1.7–11.3; p = 0.0020). ART use was also elevated among children with hepatoblastoma, but this relationship appeared to be due to the strong associations between ART use and lower birthweight in our sample. No specific ART modality appeared to drive these associations. In univariate models, multiple gestation was associated with a 2.7‐fold increased odds of hepatoblastoma (OR = 2.71; 95% CI = 1.14–6.42; p = 0.02) and a 1.6‐fold increased odds of neuroblastoma (OR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.03–2.54; p = 0.03), but these associations were not retained in multivariable models. Conclusions Associations between ART use and hepatoblastoma risk may be attributable to birthweight, a known hepatoblastoma risk factor. ART use may also be associated with osteosarcoma, independent of birthweight, an association not previously observed in studies limited to cancers diagnosed before adolescence. Evaluating long‐term health outcomes in children conceived by ART, throughout adolescence and potentially into adulthood, appears warranted.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5114assisted reproductive technologycancer risk factorsepidemiologyin vitro fertilizationliver cancerosteosarcoma
spellingShingle Natalie B. Gulrajani
Samuel Montes
Daniel McGough
Courtney E. Wimberly
Ameera Khattab
Eleanor C. Semmes
Lisa Towry
Jennifer L. Cohen
Jillian H. Hurst
Daniel Landi
Sherika N. Hill
Kyle M. Walsh
Assisted reproductive technology and association with childhood cancer subtypes
Cancer Medicine
assisted reproductive technology
cancer risk factors
epidemiology
in vitro fertilization
liver cancer
osteosarcoma
title Assisted reproductive technology and association with childhood cancer subtypes
title_full Assisted reproductive technology and association with childhood cancer subtypes
title_fullStr Assisted reproductive technology and association with childhood cancer subtypes
title_full_unstemmed Assisted reproductive technology and association with childhood cancer subtypes
title_short Assisted reproductive technology and association with childhood cancer subtypes
title_sort assisted reproductive technology and association with childhood cancer subtypes
topic assisted reproductive technology
cancer risk factors
epidemiology
in vitro fertilization
liver cancer
osteosarcoma
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5114
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliebgulrajani assistedreproductivetechnologyandassociationwithchildhoodcancersubtypes
AT samuelmontes assistedreproductivetechnologyandassociationwithchildhoodcancersubtypes
AT danielmcgough assistedreproductivetechnologyandassociationwithchildhoodcancersubtypes
AT courtneyewimberly assistedreproductivetechnologyandassociationwithchildhoodcancersubtypes
AT ameerakhattab assistedreproductivetechnologyandassociationwithchildhoodcancersubtypes
AT eleanorcsemmes assistedreproductivetechnologyandassociationwithchildhoodcancersubtypes
AT lisatowry assistedreproductivetechnologyandassociationwithchildhoodcancersubtypes
AT jenniferlcohen assistedreproductivetechnologyandassociationwithchildhoodcancersubtypes
AT jillianhhurst assistedreproductivetechnologyandassociationwithchildhoodcancersubtypes
AT daniellandi assistedreproductivetechnologyandassociationwithchildhoodcancersubtypes
AT sherikanhill assistedreproductivetechnologyandassociationwithchildhoodcancersubtypes
AT kylemwalsh assistedreproductivetechnologyandassociationwithchildhoodcancersubtypes