Efficacy and exploratory analysis of potential mechanisms of stellate ganglion block in alleviating sleep disturbance in generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial excluding comorbid depression

ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and mechanisms of stellate ganglion block (SGB) in treating generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) with sleep disturbance, excluding patients with comorbid depression.MethodsThis double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 128 patients with GAD (Hamilton...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Na Liu, Qinying Ma, Moqing Zhou, Lin Yang, Wenyuan Wang, Yanyong Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2025.1554841/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and mechanisms of stellate ganglion block (SGB) in treating generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) with sleep disturbance, excluding patients with comorbid depression.MethodsThis double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 128 patients with GAD (Hamilton Anxiety Scale [HAMA] > 14, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale [GAD-7] ≥ 5) and sleep disturbance (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI] ≥ 15), randomized to receive SGB (n = 64, 4 ultrasound-guided 1% lidocaine injections) or conventional treatment (n = 64, cognitive behavioral therapy [CBT] + estazolam 1–2 mg/day). Outcomes included anxiety (HAMA), depression (Hamilton Depression Scale [HAMD]), sleep quality (PSQI), polysomnography (PSG), and neurotransmitter levels (norepinephrine [NE], serotonin [5-HT], neuropeptide Y [NPY]).ResultsAfter 4 weeks, SGB demonstrated higher efficacy (98.4% vs. 89.1%, p = 0.028) and greater reductions in HAMA (9.36 ± 2.34 vs. 11.87 ± 2.71, p < 0.001) and HAMD scores (6.87 ± 2.01 vs. 8.09 ± 2.04, p < 0.001). PSQI improved significantly in the SGB group (5.74 ± 1.64 vs. 8.03 ± 1.86, p < 0.001), with increased total sleep time (TST) (429.76 ± 33.22 vs. 391.13 ± 30.76 min, p < 0.001) and efficiency (90.23 ± 13.29% vs. 86.34 ± 12.84%, p < 0.001). Neurotransmitter analysis showed reduced NE (289.43 ± 51.68 vs. 253.78 ± 57.12 pg./mL, p < 0.05) and increased 5-HT (138.56 ± 19.73 vs. 124.93 ± 18.44 ng/mL, p < 0.05) and NPY (453.21 ± 73.41 vs. 402.34 ± 68.12 pg./mL, p < 0.05). Adverse events were comparable (6.25% vs. 3.13%, p = 0.403).ConclusionSGB effectively improves GAD symptoms and sleep quality in patients without comorbid depression, potentially via modulation of NE, 5-HT, and NPY pathways. The exclusion of psychiatric comorbidities enhances the specificity of these findings.
ISSN:1664-2295