Democratically Binding

The 'democracy unbound' project aspires to extend democracy in two dimensions: range and scope. The former would give a wider range of people the vote. The latter would give people a wider scope of things to vote on. In practice, no doubt there is room to do much more of both....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robert E. Goodin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law 2010-12-01
Series:Oñati Socio-Legal Series
Subjects:
Online Access:https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/22
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850146237396811776
author Robert E. Goodin
author_facet Robert E. Goodin
author_sort Robert E. Goodin
collection DOAJ
description The 'democracy unbound' project aspires to extend democracy in two dimensions: range and scope. The former would give a wider range of people the vote. The latter would give people a wider scope of things to vote on. In practice, no doubt there is room to do much more of both. But whereas it would be democratically justifiable in an ideal world for democracy to be completely unbounded as regards range, even in an ideal world democracy ought be subject to some limits internal to the logic of democracy itself as regards its scope. DOWNLOAD THIS PAPER FROM SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1837428
format Article
id doaj-art-ba858bac05894f7fba57ec38be8f2645
institution OA Journals
issn 2079-5971
language English
publishDate 2010-12-01
publisher Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law
record_format Article
series Oñati Socio-Legal Series
spelling doaj-art-ba858bac05894f7fba57ec38be8f26452025-08-20T02:27:54ZengOñati International Institute for the Sociology of LawOñati Socio-Legal Series2079-59712010-12-011521Democratically BindingRobert E. Goodin0Research School of Social Sciences Australian National University The 'democracy unbound' project aspires to extend democracy in two dimensions: range and scope. The former would give a wider range of people the vote. The latter would give people a wider scope of things to vote on. In practice, no doubt there is room to do much more of both. But whereas it would be democratically justifiable in an ideal world for democracy to be completely unbounded as regards range, even in an ideal world democracy ought be subject to some limits internal to the logic of democracy itself as regards its scope. DOWNLOAD THIS PAPER FROM SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1837428 https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/22Bindingness of lawDemocratic franchiseAll affected interestsLimits to democracyDemocracy
spellingShingle Robert E. Goodin
Democratically Binding
Oñati Socio-Legal Series
Bindingness of law
Democratic franchise
All affected interests
Limits to democracy
Democracy
title Democratically Binding
title_full Democratically Binding
title_fullStr Democratically Binding
title_full_unstemmed Democratically Binding
title_short Democratically Binding
title_sort democratically binding
topic Bindingness of law
Democratic franchise
All affected interests
Limits to democracy
Democracy
url https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/22
work_keys_str_mv AT robertegoodin democraticallybinding