Practical Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Glaucoma Diagnosis
Purpose. By comparing the performance of different models between artificial intelligence (AI) and doctors, we aim to evaluate and identify the optimal model for future usage of AI. Methods. A total of 500 fundus images of glaucoma and 500 fundus images of normal eyes were collected and randomly div...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Ophthalmology |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5212128 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849685264972120064 |
|---|---|
| author | Di Gong Man Hu Yue Yin Tong Zhao Tong Ding Fan Meng Yongli Xu Yi Chen |
| author_facet | Di Gong Man Hu Yue Yin Tong Zhao Tong Ding Fan Meng Yongli Xu Yi Chen |
| author_sort | Di Gong |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Purpose. By comparing the performance of different models between artificial intelligence (AI) and doctors, we aim to evaluate and identify the optimal model for future usage of AI. Methods. A total of 500 fundus images of glaucoma and 500 fundus images of normal eyes were collected and randomly divided into five groups, with each group corresponding to one round. The AI system provided diagnostic suggestions for each image. Four doctors provided diagnoses without the assistance of the AI in the first round and with the assistance of the AI in the second and third rounds. In the fourth round, doctor B and doctor D made diagnoses with the help of the AI and the other two doctors without the help of the AI. In the last round, doctor A and doctor B made diagnoses with the help of AI and the other two doctors without the help of the AI. Results. Doctor A, doctor B, and doctor D had a higher accuracy in the diagnosis of glaucoma with the assistance of AI in the second (p=0.036, p=0.003, and p≤0.000) and the third round (p=0.021, p≤0.000, and p≤0.000) than in the first round. The accuracy of at least one doctor was higher than that of AI in the second and third rounds, in spite of no detectable significance (p=0.283, p=0.727, p=0.344, and p=0.508). The four doctors’ overall accuracy (p=0.004 and p≤0.000) and sensitivity (p=0.006 and p≤0.000) as a whole were significantly improved in the second and third rounds. Conclusions. This “Doctor + AI” model can clarify the role of doctors and AI in medical responsibility and ensure the safety of patients, and importantly, this model shows great potential and application prospects. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ba6a75b5a6234a59ac4e5ccc84b0222a |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2090-0058 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Ophthalmology |
| spelling | doaj-art-ba6a75b5a6234a59ac4e5ccc84b0222a2025-08-20T03:23:12ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-00582022-01-01202210.1155/2022/5212128Practical Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Glaucoma DiagnosisDi Gong0Man Hu1Yue Yin2Tong Zhao3Tong Ding4Fan Meng5Yongli Xu6Yi Chen7Department of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyDepartment of MathematicsDepartment of MathematicsDepartment of OphthalmologyPurpose. By comparing the performance of different models between artificial intelligence (AI) and doctors, we aim to evaluate and identify the optimal model for future usage of AI. Methods. A total of 500 fundus images of glaucoma and 500 fundus images of normal eyes were collected and randomly divided into five groups, with each group corresponding to one round. The AI system provided diagnostic suggestions for each image. Four doctors provided diagnoses without the assistance of the AI in the first round and with the assistance of the AI in the second and third rounds. In the fourth round, doctor B and doctor D made diagnoses with the help of the AI and the other two doctors without the help of the AI. In the last round, doctor A and doctor B made diagnoses with the help of AI and the other two doctors without the help of the AI. Results. Doctor A, doctor B, and doctor D had a higher accuracy in the diagnosis of glaucoma with the assistance of AI in the second (p=0.036, p=0.003, and p≤0.000) and the third round (p=0.021, p≤0.000, and p≤0.000) than in the first round. The accuracy of at least one doctor was higher than that of AI in the second and third rounds, in spite of no detectable significance (p=0.283, p=0.727, p=0.344, and p=0.508). The four doctors’ overall accuracy (p=0.004 and p≤0.000) and sensitivity (p=0.006 and p≤0.000) as a whole were significantly improved in the second and third rounds. Conclusions. This “Doctor + AI” model can clarify the role of doctors and AI in medical responsibility and ensure the safety of patients, and importantly, this model shows great potential and application prospects.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5212128 |
| spellingShingle | Di Gong Man Hu Yue Yin Tong Zhao Tong Ding Fan Meng Yongli Xu Yi Chen Practical Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Glaucoma Diagnosis Journal of Ophthalmology |
| title | Practical Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Glaucoma Diagnosis |
| title_full | Practical Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Glaucoma Diagnosis |
| title_fullStr | Practical Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Glaucoma Diagnosis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Practical Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Glaucoma Diagnosis |
| title_short | Practical Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Glaucoma Diagnosis |
| title_sort | practical application of artificial intelligence technology in glaucoma diagnosis |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5212128 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT digong practicalapplicationofartificialintelligencetechnologyinglaucomadiagnosis AT manhu practicalapplicationofartificialintelligencetechnologyinglaucomadiagnosis AT yueyin practicalapplicationofartificialintelligencetechnologyinglaucomadiagnosis AT tongzhao practicalapplicationofartificialintelligencetechnologyinglaucomadiagnosis AT tongding practicalapplicationofartificialintelligencetechnologyinglaucomadiagnosis AT fanmeng practicalapplicationofartificialintelligencetechnologyinglaucomadiagnosis AT yonglixu practicalapplicationofartificialintelligencetechnologyinglaucomadiagnosis AT yichen practicalapplicationofartificialintelligencetechnologyinglaucomadiagnosis |