A Review of Doses for Dental Imaging in 2010–2020 and Development of a Web Dose Calculator

Dental imaging is one of the most common types of diagnostic radiological procedures in modern medicine. We introduce a comprehensive table of organ doses received by patients in dental imaging procedures extracted from literature and a new web application to visualize the summarized dose informatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hawon Lee, Andreu Badal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Radiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6924314
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849684216271339520
author Hawon Lee
Andreu Badal
author_facet Hawon Lee
Andreu Badal
author_sort Hawon Lee
collection DOAJ
description Dental imaging is one of the most common types of diagnostic radiological procedures in modern medicine. We introduce a comprehensive table of organ doses received by patients in dental imaging procedures extracted from literature and a new web application to visualize the summarized dose information. We analyzed articles, published after 2010, from PubMed on organ and effective doses delivered by dental imaging procedures, including intraoral radiography, panoramic radiography, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and summarized doses by dosimetry method, machine model, patient age, and technical parameters. Mean effective doses delivered by intraoral, 1.32 (0.60–2.56) μSv, and panoramic, 17.93 (3.47–75.00) μSv, procedures were found to be about1% and 15% of that delivered by CBCT, 121.09 (17.10–392.20) μSv, respectively. In CBCT imaging, child phantoms received about 29% more effective dose than the adult phantoms received. The effective dose of a large field of view (FOV) (>150 cm2) was about 1.6 times greater than that of a small FOV (<50 cm2). The maximum CBCT effective dose with a large FOV for children, 392.2 μSv, was about 13% of theeffective dose that a person receives on average every year from natural radiation, 3110 μSv. Monte Carlo simulations of representative cases of the three dental imaging procedures were then conducted to estimate and visualize the dose distribution within the head. The user-friendly interactive web application (available at http://dentaldose.org) receives user input, such as the number of intraoral radiographs taken, and displays total organ and effective doses, dose distribution maps, and a comparison with other medical and natural sources of radiation. The web dose calculator provides a practical resource for patients interested in understanding the radiation doses delivered by dental imaging procedures.
format Article
id doaj-art-ba5e8f6861a04786bfa0f68eb867a566
institution DOAJ
issn 2090-195X
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Radiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-ba5e8f6861a04786bfa0f68eb867a5662025-08-20T03:23:31ZengWileyRadiology Research and Practice2090-195X2021-01-01202110.1155/2021/6924314A Review of Doses for Dental Imaging in 2010–2020 and Development of a Web Dose CalculatorHawon Lee0Andreu Badal1Montgomery Blair High SchoolDivision of Imaging, Diagnostics and Software ReliabilityDental imaging is one of the most common types of diagnostic radiological procedures in modern medicine. We introduce a comprehensive table of organ doses received by patients in dental imaging procedures extracted from literature and a new web application to visualize the summarized dose information. We analyzed articles, published after 2010, from PubMed on organ and effective doses delivered by dental imaging procedures, including intraoral radiography, panoramic radiography, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and summarized doses by dosimetry method, machine model, patient age, and technical parameters. Mean effective doses delivered by intraoral, 1.32 (0.60–2.56) μSv, and panoramic, 17.93 (3.47–75.00) μSv, procedures were found to be about1% and 15% of that delivered by CBCT, 121.09 (17.10–392.20) μSv, respectively. In CBCT imaging, child phantoms received about 29% more effective dose than the adult phantoms received. The effective dose of a large field of view (FOV) (>150 cm2) was about 1.6 times greater than that of a small FOV (<50 cm2). The maximum CBCT effective dose with a large FOV for children, 392.2 μSv, was about 13% of theeffective dose that a person receives on average every year from natural radiation, 3110 μSv. Monte Carlo simulations of representative cases of the three dental imaging procedures were then conducted to estimate and visualize the dose distribution within the head. The user-friendly interactive web application (available at http://dentaldose.org) receives user input, such as the number of intraoral radiographs taken, and displays total organ and effective doses, dose distribution maps, and a comparison with other medical and natural sources of radiation. The web dose calculator provides a practical resource for patients interested in understanding the radiation doses delivered by dental imaging procedures.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6924314
spellingShingle Hawon Lee
Andreu Badal
A Review of Doses for Dental Imaging in 2010–2020 and Development of a Web Dose Calculator
Radiology Research and Practice
title A Review of Doses for Dental Imaging in 2010–2020 and Development of a Web Dose Calculator
title_full A Review of Doses for Dental Imaging in 2010–2020 and Development of a Web Dose Calculator
title_fullStr A Review of Doses for Dental Imaging in 2010–2020 and Development of a Web Dose Calculator
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Doses for Dental Imaging in 2010–2020 and Development of a Web Dose Calculator
title_short A Review of Doses for Dental Imaging in 2010–2020 and Development of a Web Dose Calculator
title_sort review of doses for dental imaging in 2010 2020 and development of a web dose calculator
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6924314
work_keys_str_mv AT hawonlee areviewofdosesfordentalimagingin20102020anddevelopmentofawebdosecalculator
AT andreubadal areviewofdosesfordentalimagingin20102020anddevelopmentofawebdosecalculator
AT hawonlee reviewofdosesfordentalimagingin20102020anddevelopmentofawebdosecalculator
AT andreubadal reviewofdosesfordentalimagingin20102020anddevelopmentofawebdosecalculator