Toward a responsible and ethical authorization to operate: A case study in AI consulting
The US federal government mandates all technologies receive an Authorization to Operate (ATO). The ATO serves as a testament to the technology's security compliance. This process underscores a fundamental belief: technologies must conform to established security norms. Yet, the security-centric...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2025-09-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Responsible Technology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659625000265 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850068480108265472 |
|---|---|
| author | Jason M. Pittman Geoff Schaefer |
| author_facet | Jason M. Pittman Geoff Schaefer |
| author_sort | Jason M. Pittman |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The US federal government mandates all technologies receive an Authorization to Operate (ATO). The ATO serves as a testament to the technology's security compliance. This process underscores a fundamental belief: technologies must conform to established security norms. Yet, the security-centric view does not include ethical and responsible AI. Unlike security parameters, ethical and responsible AI lacks a standardized framework for evaluation. This leaves a critical gap in AI governance. This paper presents our consulting experiences in addressing such a gap and introduces a pioneering ATO assessment instrument. The instrument integrates ethical and responsible AI principles into assessment decision-making. We delve into the instrument's design, shedding light on unique attributes and features. Furthermore, we discuss emergent best practices related to this ATO instrument. These include potential decision pitfalls of interest to practitioners and policymakers alike. Looking ahead, we envision an evolved version of this ethical and responsible ATO. This future iteration incorporates continuous monitoring capabilities and novel ethical measures. Finally, we offer insights for the AI community to evaluate their AI decision-making. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ba4732c13bb74342a1bfa70b18738e80 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2666-6596 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-09-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Responsible Technology |
| spelling | doaj-art-ba4732c13bb74342a1bfa70b18738e802025-08-20T02:48:02ZengElsevierJournal of Responsible Technology2666-65962025-09-012310013010.1016/j.jrt.2025.100130Toward a responsible and ethical authorization to operate: A case study in AI consultingJason M. Pittman0Geoff Schaefer1University of Maryland Global Campus, USA; Corresponding author.Booz Allen Hamilton, USAThe US federal government mandates all technologies receive an Authorization to Operate (ATO). The ATO serves as a testament to the technology's security compliance. This process underscores a fundamental belief: technologies must conform to established security norms. Yet, the security-centric view does not include ethical and responsible AI. Unlike security parameters, ethical and responsible AI lacks a standardized framework for evaluation. This leaves a critical gap in AI governance. This paper presents our consulting experiences in addressing such a gap and introduces a pioneering ATO assessment instrument. The instrument integrates ethical and responsible AI principles into assessment decision-making. We delve into the instrument's design, shedding light on unique attributes and features. Furthermore, we discuss emergent best practices related to this ATO instrument. These include potential decision pitfalls of interest to practitioners and policymakers alike. Looking ahead, we envision an evolved version of this ethical and responsible ATO. This future iteration incorporates continuous monitoring capabilities and novel ethical measures. Finally, we offer insights for the AI community to evaluate their AI decision-making.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659625000265Responsible artificial intelligenceEthical artificial intelligenceAuthority to operateCase study |
| spellingShingle | Jason M. Pittman Geoff Schaefer Toward a responsible and ethical authorization to operate: A case study in AI consulting Journal of Responsible Technology Responsible artificial intelligence Ethical artificial intelligence Authority to operate Case study |
| title | Toward a responsible and ethical authorization to operate: A case study in AI consulting |
| title_full | Toward a responsible and ethical authorization to operate: A case study in AI consulting |
| title_fullStr | Toward a responsible and ethical authorization to operate: A case study in AI consulting |
| title_full_unstemmed | Toward a responsible and ethical authorization to operate: A case study in AI consulting |
| title_short | Toward a responsible and ethical authorization to operate: A case study in AI consulting |
| title_sort | toward a responsible and ethical authorization to operate a case study in ai consulting |
| topic | Responsible artificial intelligence Ethical artificial intelligence Authority to operate Case study |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659625000265 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jasonmpittman towardaresponsibleandethicalauthorizationtooperateacasestudyinaiconsulting AT geoffschaefer towardaresponsibleandethicalauthorizationtooperateacasestudyinaiconsulting |