Access Differentials in Primary Healthcare among Vulnerable Populations in a Health Insurance Setting in Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background. Access to healthcare remains a challenge towards the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals in Ghana. There still remain inequalities in the distribution of health services especially among vulnerable groups despite sustained efforts to strengthen the health system. This study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gertrude Acquah-Hagan, Daniel Boateng, Emmanuel Appiah-Brempong, Peter Twum, Joseph Amankwa Atta, Peter Agyei-Baffour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Advances in Public Health
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9911436
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832548424372715520
author Gertrude Acquah-Hagan
Daniel Boateng
Emmanuel Appiah-Brempong
Peter Twum
Joseph Amankwa Atta
Peter Agyei-Baffour
author_facet Gertrude Acquah-Hagan
Daniel Boateng
Emmanuel Appiah-Brempong
Peter Twum
Joseph Amankwa Atta
Peter Agyei-Baffour
author_sort Gertrude Acquah-Hagan
collection DOAJ
description Background. Access to healthcare remains a challenge towards the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals in Ghana. There still remain inequalities in the distribution of health services especially among vulnerable groups despite sustained efforts to strengthen the health system. This study was conducted to analyze access differentials among different vulnerable groups in the context of primary healthcare under a National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in Ghana. Methods. This study was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted among multilevel participants of vulnerable groups in Kumasi Metropolis: 710 vulnerable people constituting elderly/aged (n = 359), pregnant women (n = 117), head poters (teenage girls who migrated from the northern Ghana mainly to the capital cities of the Ashanti and Greater Accra region to help in carrying of goods for their livelihood) (n = 86), sex workers (n = 75), and other vulnerable groups (people with disabilities and street participants) (n = 73). Data were collected using a semistructured questionnaire. Poisson regression with robust variance was used to access the association between vulnerability and access to healthcare. Results. Close to a fifth, 18.5% of the study respondents were unable to access care at any point in time during the last 12 months. Reasons for the inability to access healthcare included limited funding (69.7%), poor attitude of service providers (7.6%), distance to health centers (8.3%), and religious reasons (6.2%). More than 95% of respondents were insured under the NHIS, but acceptability of service provision under the NHIS was low among the vulnerable groups. In the crude models, pregnant women had lower prevalence of access to medications as compared to the elderly (prevalence ratio (PR): 0.88; 95% CI: 0.80–0.98). Head poters and other vulnerable groups were also less likely to view healthcare as affordable as compared to the elderly. The differences in healthcare access observed were attenuated after adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics and healthcare-related factors. Conclusions. Despite the introduction of a NHIS in Ghana, this study highlights challenges in healthcare access among vulnerable populations independent of the type of vulnerability. This suggests the need for stakeholders to work to address access differentials in the NHIS and adopt other innovative care strategies that may have broader applicability for all populations.
format Article
id doaj-art-ba379edd1340481a957f0480a28f4589
institution Kabale University
issn 2356-6868
2314-7784
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Public Health
spelling doaj-art-ba379edd1340481a957f0480a28f45892025-02-03T06:14:11ZengWileyAdvances in Public Health2356-68682314-77842021-01-01202110.1155/2021/99114369911436Access Differentials in Primary Healthcare among Vulnerable Populations in a Health Insurance Setting in Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana: A Cross-Sectional StudyGertrude Acquah-Hagan0Daniel Boateng1Emmanuel Appiah-Brempong2Peter Twum3Joseph Amankwa Atta4Peter Agyei-Baffour5School of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, GhanaSchool of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, GhanaSchool of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, GhanaSchool of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, GhanaMethodist Hospital, Ankaase, Ashanti, GhanaSchool of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, GhanaBackground. Access to healthcare remains a challenge towards the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals in Ghana. There still remain inequalities in the distribution of health services especially among vulnerable groups despite sustained efforts to strengthen the health system. This study was conducted to analyze access differentials among different vulnerable groups in the context of primary healthcare under a National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in Ghana. Methods. This study was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted among multilevel participants of vulnerable groups in Kumasi Metropolis: 710 vulnerable people constituting elderly/aged (n = 359), pregnant women (n = 117), head poters (teenage girls who migrated from the northern Ghana mainly to the capital cities of the Ashanti and Greater Accra region to help in carrying of goods for their livelihood) (n = 86), sex workers (n = 75), and other vulnerable groups (people with disabilities and street participants) (n = 73). Data were collected using a semistructured questionnaire. Poisson regression with robust variance was used to access the association between vulnerability and access to healthcare. Results. Close to a fifth, 18.5% of the study respondents were unable to access care at any point in time during the last 12 months. Reasons for the inability to access healthcare included limited funding (69.7%), poor attitude of service providers (7.6%), distance to health centers (8.3%), and religious reasons (6.2%). More than 95% of respondents were insured under the NHIS, but acceptability of service provision under the NHIS was low among the vulnerable groups. In the crude models, pregnant women had lower prevalence of access to medications as compared to the elderly (prevalence ratio (PR): 0.88; 95% CI: 0.80–0.98). Head poters and other vulnerable groups were also less likely to view healthcare as affordable as compared to the elderly. The differences in healthcare access observed were attenuated after adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics and healthcare-related factors. Conclusions. Despite the introduction of a NHIS in Ghana, this study highlights challenges in healthcare access among vulnerable populations independent of the type of vulnerability. This suggests the need for stakeholders to work to address access differentials in the NHIS and adopt other innovative care strategies that may have broader applicability for all populations.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9911436
spellingShingle Gertrude Acquah-Hagan
Daniel Boateng
Emmanuel Appiah-Brempong
Peter Twum
Joseph Amankwa Atta
Peter Agyei-Baffour
Access Differentials in Primary Healthcare among Vulnerable Populations in a Health Insurance Setting in Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study
Advances in Public Health
title Access Differentials in Primary Healthcare among Vulnerable Populations in a Health Insurance Setting in Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Access Differentials in Primary Healthcare among Vulnerable Populations in a Health Insurance Setting in Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Access Differentials in Primary Healthcare among Vulnerable Populations in a Health Insurance Setting in Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Access Differentials in Primary Healthcare among Vulnerable Populations in a Health Insurance Setting in Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Access Differentials in Primary Healthcare among Vulnerable Populations in a Health Insurance Setting in Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort access differentials in primary healthcare among vulnerable populations in a health insurance setting in kumasi metropolis ghana a cross sectional study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9911436
work_keys_str_mv AT gertrudeacquahhagan accessdifferentialsinprimaryhealthcareamongvulnerablepopulationsinahealthinsurancesettinginkumasimetropolisghanaacrosssectionalstudy
AT danielboateng accessdifferentialsinprimaryhealthcareamongvulnerablepopulationsinahealthinsurancesettinginkumasimetropolisghanaacrosssectionalstudy
AT emmanuelappiahbrempong accessdifferentialsinprimaryhealthcareamongvulnerablepopulationsinahealthinsurancesettinginkumasimetropolisghanaacrosssectionalstudy
AT petertwum accessdifferentialsinprimaryhealthcareamongvulnerablepopulationsinahealthinsurancesettinginkumasimetropolisghanaacrosssectionalstudy
AT josephamankwaatta accessdifferentialsinprimaryhealthcareamongvulnerablepopulationsinahealthinsurancesettinginkumasimetropolisghanaacrosssectionalstudy
AT peteragyeibaffour accessdifferentialsinprimaryhealthcareamongvulnerablepopulationsinahealthinsurancesettinginkumasimetropolisghanaacrosssectionalstudy