Risk factors of mandibular angle fractures based on digital reduction method: a retrospective analysis

Abstract Aim This study aimed to evaluate radiomorphometric risk factors for mandibular angle fractures (MAFs) by simulating pre-fracture mandibular anatomy using digital reduction techniques on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Demographic and etiological characteristics were also analyz...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dilek ŞAHAR, Aydın Onur GERÇEK, Nuray BAYRAKÇI
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-08-01
Series:BMC Oral Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06706-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849225865145090048
author Dilek ŞAHAR
Aydın Onur GERÇEK
Nuray BAYRAKÇI
author_facet Dilek ŞAHAR
Aydın Onur GERÇEK
Nuray BAYRAKÇI
author_sort Dilek ŞAHAR
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aim This study aimed to evaluate radiomorphometric risk factors for mandibular angle fractures (MAFs) by simulating pre-fracture mandibular anatomy using digital reduction techniques on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Demographic and etiological characteristics were also analyzed to identify factors associated with MAF occurrence. Methods In this retrospective study, 55 patients with mandibular fractures were categorized into two groups: those with mandibular angle fractures (MAF, n = 20) and those with fractures in other mandibular regions (non-MAF, n = 35). High-resolution CBCT scans were analyzed following digital fragment realignment using Materialise Mimics 25.0. Radiomorphometric measurements included gonial angle, ramus height, and ramus width. Demographic variables, third molar status, and trauma etiology were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U, chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and independent samples t tests, with a significance level of p < 0.05. Results Patients in the MAF group were significantly younger (median age: 21 vs. 27 years; p = 0.002) and predominantly male (90%). Third molars were more frequently observed in the MAF group (85%) and were significantly associated with angle fractures (p = 0.019). Condylar fractures occurred in 42.9% of the non-MAF group but were absent in the MAF group (p < 0.001). Conclusion CBCT combined with digital reduction improves anatomical assessment and standardization in fracture evaluation. Younger age, male gender, and the presence of third molars were significantly associated with MAFs. Third molars may represent a modifiable risk factor for mandibular angle fractures and should be considered carefully in clinical prevention strategies.
format Article
id doaj-art-ba22ab52c3ee48c9b5d1e2057e96c2d3
institution Kabale University
issn 1472-6831
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Oral Health
spelling doaj-art-ba22ab52c3ee48c9b5d1e2057e96c2d32025-08-24T11:54:52ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312025-08-012511910.1186/s12903-025-06706-8Risk factors of mandibular angle fractures based on digital reduction method: a retrospective analysisDilek ŞAHAR0Aydın Onur GERÇEK1Nuray BAYRAKÇI2Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Sıhhiye, Hacettepe UniversityFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Sıhhiye, Hacettepe UniversityFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Sıhhiye, Hacettepe UniversityAbstract Aim This study aimed to evaluate radiomorphometric risk factors for mandibular angle fractures (MAFs) by simulating pre-fracture mandibular anatomy using digital reduction techniques on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Demographic and etiological characteristics were also analyzed to identify factors associated with MAF occurrence. Methods In this retrospective study, 55 patients with mandibular fractures were categorized into two groups: those with mandibular angle fractures (MAF, n = 20) and those with fractures in other mandibular regions (non-MAF, n = 35). High-resolution CBCT scans were analyzed following digital fragment realignment using Materialise Mimics 25.0. Radiomorphometric measurements included gonial angle, ramus height, and ramus width. Demographic variables, third molar status, and trauma etiology were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U, chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and independent samples t tests, with a significance level of p < 0.05. Results Patients in the MAF group were significantly younger (median age: 21 vs. 27 years; p = 0.002) and predominantly male (90%). Third molars were more frequently observed in the MAF group (85%) and were significantly associated with angle fractures (p = 0.019). Condylar fractures occurred in 42.9% of the non-MAF group but were absent in the MAF group (p < 0.001). Conclusion CBCT combined with digital reduction improves anatomical assessment and standardization in fracture evaluation. Younger age, male gender, and the presence of third molars were significantly associated with MAFs. Third molars may represent a modifiable risk factor for mandibular angle fractures and should be considered carefully in clinical prevention strategies.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06706-8Digital reductionGonial angleMandibular angle fractureRadiomorphometric analysis
spellingShingle Dilek ŞAHAR
Aydın Onur GERÇEK
Nuray BAYRAKÇI
Risk factors of mandibular angle fractures based on digital reduction method: a retrospective analysis
BMC Oral Health
Digital reduction
Gonial angle
Mandibular angle fracture
Radiomorphometric analysis
title Risk factors of mandibular angle fractures based on digital reduction method: a retrospective analysis
title_full Risk factors of mandibular angle fractures based on digital reduction method: a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Risk factors of mandibular angle fractures based on digital reduction method: a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors of mandibular angle fractures based on digital reduction method: a retrospective analysis
title_short Risk factors of mandibular angle fractures based on digital reduction method: a retrospective analysis
title_sort risk factors of mandibular angle fractures based on digital reduction method a retrospective analysis
topic Digital reduction
Gonial angle
Mandibular angle fracture
Radiomorphometric analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06706-8
work_keys_str_mv AT dileksahar riskfactorsofmandibularanglefracturesbasedondigitalreductionmethodaretrospectiveanalysis
AT aydınonurgercek riskfactorsofmandibularanglefracturesbasedondigitalreductionmethodaretrospectiveanalysis
AT nuraybayrakci riskfactorsofmandibularanglefracturesbasedondigitalreductionmethodaretrospectiveanalysis