Comparative study by DFT method of physical properties of monolayer and bulk InX (X=P, As and Sb)

In this work, we investigated and compared the physical properties of planar monolayer and bulk structures of InX (X=P, As, and Sb) materials using density functional theory (DFT). The PBE-sol approximation is used for structural properties and mBJ one for electronic and optical properties. The resu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamza Imtki, El Houssine Atmani, Nejma Fazouan, Mustapha Madi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-05-01
Series:Results in Surfaces and Interfaces
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666845925000820
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849768981043347456
author Hamza Imtki
El Houssine Atmani
Nejma Fazouan
Mustapha Madi
author_facet Hamza Imtki
El Houssine Atmani
Nejma Fazouan
Mustapha Madi
author_sort Hamza Imtki
collection DOAJ
description In this work, we investigated and compared the physical properties of planar monolayer and bulk structures of InX (X=P, As, and Sb) materials using density functional theory (DFT). The PBE-sol approximation is used for structural properties and mBJ one for electronic and optical properties. The results show that the lattice parameters of planar monolayers are greater than those of the corresponding bulk, while the In-X bond length is reduced. The band gaps are direct in bulk structures, whereas they become indirect in planar monolayers. Going from bulk to monolayer, we notice an increase in gap energies of 0.46, 0.53, and 0.34 eV for InP, InAs, and InSb, respectively. This increase is attributed to quantum size effects. The optical results show a high transparency for planar monolayers, which reaches 96% compared to bulk structures, which do not exceed 60%. According to our results, these compounds could serve as promising candidates for the development of future optoelectronic devices.
format Article
id doaj-art-ba21eeea3dd14f3c97a0e98d0445aa93
institution DOAJ
issn 2666-8459
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Results in Surfaces and Interfaces
spelling doaj-art-ba21eeea3dd14f3c97a0e98d0445aa932025-08-20T03:03:37ZengElsevierResults in Surfaces and Interfaces2666-84592025-05-011910049510.1016/j.rsurfi.2025.100495Comparative study by DFT method of physical properties of monolayer and bulk InX (X=P, As and Sb)Hamza Imtki0El Houssine Atmani1Nejma Fazouan2Mustapha Madi3Corresponding authors.; Laboratory of Nanostructures and Advanced Materials, Mechanics and Thermofluids. FST of Mohammedia, Hassan II University of Casablanca, MoroccoCorresponding authors.; Laboratory of Nanostructures and Advanced Materials, Mechanics and Thermofluids. FST of Mohammedia, Hassan II University of Casablanca, MoroccoLaboratory of Nanostructures and Advanced Materials, Mechanics and Thermofluids. FST of Mohammedia, Hassan II University of Casablanca, MoroccoLaboratory of Nanostructures and Advanced Materials, Mechanics and Thermofluids. FST of Mohammedia, Hassan II University of Casablanca, MoroccoIn this work, we investigated and compared the physical properties of planar monolayer and bulk structures of InX (X=P, As, and Sb) materials using density functional theory (DFT). The PBE-sol approximation is used for structural properties and mBJ one for electronic and optical properties. The results show that the lattice parameters of planar monolayers are greater than those of the corresponding bulk, while the In-X bond length is reduced. The band gaps are direct in bulk structures, whereas they become indirect in planar monolayers. Going from bulk to monolayer, we notice an increase in gap energies of 0.46, 0.53, and 0.34 eV for InP, InAs, and InSb, respectively. This increase is attributed to quantum size effects. The optical results show a high transparency for planar monolayers, which reaches 96% compared to bulk structures, which do not exceed 60%. According to our results, these compounds could serve as promising candidates for the development of future optoelectronic devices.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666845925000820DFTInX monolayersStructural propertiesElectronic propertiesOptical properties
spellingShingle Hamza Imtki
El Houssine Atmani
Nejma Fazouan
Mustapha Madi
Comparative study by DFT method of physical properties of monolayer and bulk InX (X=P, As and Sb)
Results in Surfaces and Interfaces
DFT
InX monolayers
Structural properties
Electronic properties
Optical properties
title Comparative study by DFT method of physical properties of monolayer and bulk InX (X=P, As and Sb)
title_full Comparative study by DFT method of physical properties of monolayer and bulk InX (X=P, As and Sb)
title_fullStr Comparative study by DFT method of physical properties of monolayer and bulk InX (X=P, As and Sb)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study by DFT method of physical properties of monolayer and bulk InX (X=P, As and Sb)
title_short Comparative study by DFT method of physical properties of monolayer and bulk InX (X=P, As and Sb)
title_sort comparative study by dft method of physical properties of monolayer and bulk inx x p as and sb
topic DFT
InX monolayers
Structural properties
Electronic properties
Optical properties
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666845925000820
work_keys_str_mv AT hamzaimtki comparativestudybydftmethodofphysicalpropertiesofmonolayerandbulkinxxpasandsb
AT elhoussineatmani comparativestudybydftmethodofphysicalpropertiesofmonolayerandbulkinxxpasandsb
AT nejmafazouan comparativestudybydftmethodofphysicalpropertiesofmonolayerandbulkinxxpasandsb
AT mustaphamadi comparativestudybydftmethodofphysicalpropertiesofmonolayerandbulkinxxpasandsb