Efficacy of IsaPomDex triplet therapy in double refractory multiple myeloma patients in real clinical practice in Russia

Background. Data from real-life clinical practice studies provide additional information on the efficacy of new antitumor therapy regimens, including in patients who meet exclusion criteria for clinical trials.Aim. To evaluate the Isaomex triplet efficacy in multiple myeloma patients in real clinica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. V. Solovev, M. V. Solovevа, L. P. Mendeleeva, T. I. Pospelova, N. V. Skvortsova, S. V. Voloshin, A. D. Garifullin, A. S. Chuprakova, T. A. Mitina, I. S. Usankin, I. V. Vasileva, N. V. Medvedeva, V. V. Ryabchikova, M. Ya. Kiseleva, G. A. Dudina, Yu. S. Gammershmidt, O. S. Kuznetsova, Yu. V. Dolgushina, G. B. Kuchma, T. N. Tsyganok, E. N. Misyurina, E. I. Zhelnova, A. V. Kopylova, M. N. Zakharova, A. V. Korobkin, G. S. Tumyan, A. A. Semenova, E. G. Kirillova, E. M. Volodicheva, V. I. Bakhtina, T. I. Olkhovik, N. R. Solovkova, M. V. Demchenkova, O. E. Ochirova, O. L. Panteleeva, V. S. Abramova
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: ABV-press 2024-12-01
Series:Онкогематология
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oncohematology.abvpress.ru/ongm/article/view/979
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850024461312458752
author M. V. Solovev
M. V. Solovevа
L. P. Mendeleeva
T. I. Pospelova
N. V. Skvortsova
S. V. Voloshin
A. D. Garifullin
A. S. Chuprakova
T. A. Mitina
I. S. Usankin
I. V. Vasileva
N. V. Medvedeva
V. V. Ryabchikova
M. Ya. Kiseleva
G. A. Dudina
Yu. S. Gammershmidt
O. S. Kuznetsova
Yu. V. Dolgushina
G. B. Kuchma
T. N. Tsyganok
E. N. Misyurina
E. I. Zhelnova
A. V. Kopylova
M. N. Zakharova
A. V. Korobkin
G. S. Tumyan
A. A. Semenova
E. G. Kirillova
E. M. Volodicheva
V. I. Bakhtina
T. I. Olkhovik
N. R. Solovkova
M. V. Demchenkova
O. E. Ochirova
O. L. Panteleeva
V. S. Abramova
author_facet M. V. Solovev
M. V. Solovevа
L. P. Mendeleeva
T. I. Pospelova
N. V. Skvortsova
S. V. Voloshin
A. D. Garifullin
A. S. Chuprakova
T. A. Mitina
I. S. Usankin
I. V. Vasileva
N. V. Medvedeva
V. V. Ryabchikova
M. Ya. Kiseleva
G. A. Dudina
Yu. S. Gammershmidt
O. S. Kuznetsova
Yu. V. Dolgushina
G. B. Kuchma
T. N. Tsyganok
E. N. Misyurina
E. I. Zhelnova
A. V. Kopylova
M. N. Zakharova
A. V. Korobkin
G. S. Tumyan
A. A. Semenova
E. G. Kirillova
E. M. Volodicheva
V. I. Bakhtina
T. I. Olkhovik
N. R. Solovkova
M. V. Demchenkova
O. E. Ochirova
O. L. Panteleeva
V. S. Abramova
author_sort M. V. Solovev
collection DOAJ
description Background. Data from real-life clinical practice studies provide additional information on the efficacy of new antitumor therapy regimens, including in patients who meet exclusion criteria for clinical trials.Aim. To evaluate the Isaomex triplet efficacy in multiple myeloma patients in real clinical practice.Materials and methods. From 2021 to 2024, the retrospective study included 83 double refractory multiple myeloma patients from 26 centers aged 38 to 85 years (median 63), who received the Isaomex triplet. Glomerular filtration rate ˂ 60 mL/min was detected at the time of isatuximabbased triplet initiation in 18 % patients, 2 of whom were on program hemodialysis. The median of previous therapy lines was 2 (1–6). The median time from diagnosis to initiation of isatuximabbased triplet therapy was 47 months (5–203). Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 10 program.Results. Isaomex triplet therapy resulted in overall and renal responses in 76 % and 61 % of cases, respectively. The median progression free survival was 13.5 months. In the group of patients who did not receive daratumumab at previous stages, the median progression free survival was significantly higher and was 28 months vs 8 months (p ˂ 0.05). Threeyear overall survival was 81 %. Discontinuation of isatuximab due to the development of adverse event was recorded in 2 cases (2 %). In the group of patients with bone plasmacytomas (n = 46), Isaomex therapy resulted in an overall response rate of 67 %; 12‑month progression free survival was 48 %, and 1‑year overall survival was 76 %.Conclusion. The results of the Isaomex triplet use in real clinical practice for the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma showed data comparable to the ICARIA registration study on the frequency of achieving a response, duration of progression free survival and overall survival. The triplet efficiency was shown in comorbid patients, with advanced stages and those undergoing renal replacement therapy.
format Article
id doaj-art-ba12ca2068db433ba70931b4e0026398
institution DOAJ
issn 1818-8346
2413-4023
language Russian
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher ABV-press
record_format Article
series Онкогематология
spelling doaj-art-ba12ca2068db433ba70931b4e00263982025-08-20T03:01:06ZrusABV-pressОнкогематология1818-83462413-40232024-12-0119411512310.17650/1818-8346-2024-19-4-115-123794Efficacy of IsaPomDex triplet therapy in double refractory multiple myeloma patients in real clinical practice in RussiaM. V. Solovev0M. V. Solovevа1L. P. Mendeleeva2T. I. Pospelova3N. V. Skvortsova4S. V. Voloshin5A. D. Garifullin6A. S. Chuprakova7T. A. Mitina8I. S. Usankin9I. V. Vasileva10N. V. Medvedeva11V. V. Ryabchikova12M. Ya. Kiseleva13G. A. Dudina14Yu. S. Gammershmidt15O. S. Kuznetsova16Yu. V. Dolgushina17G. B. Kuchma18T. N. Tsyganok19E. N. Misyurina20E. I. Zhelnova21A. V. Kopylova22M. N. Zakharova23A. V. Korobkin24G. S. Tumyan25A. A. Semenova26E. G. Kirillova27E. M. Volodicheva28V. I. Bakhtina29T. I. Olkhovik30N. R. Solovkova31M. V. Demchenkova32O. E. Ochirova33O. L. Panteleeva34V. S. Abramova35National Medical Research Center for Hematology, Ministry of Health of RussiaNational Medical Research Center for Hematology, Ministry of Health of RussiaNational Medical Research Center for Hematology, Ministry of Health of RussiaNovosibirsk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of RussiaNovosibirsk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of RussiaLeningrad Regional Clinical HospitalRussian Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology, Federal Medical and Biological AgencyCentral City Clinical HospitalM.F. Vladimirskiy Moscow Regional Research Clinical InstituteCentral City Hospital No. 7Central City Hospital No. 7City Clinical Hospital No. 31City Clinical Hospital No. 31N.A. Semashko Republican Clinical HospitalA.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare DepartmentTomsk Regional Clinical HospitalA.A. Lutsik Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital No. 29A.A. Lutsik Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital No. 29V.I. Voynov Orenburg Regional Clinical HospitalSakhalin Regional Clinical HospitalMoscow City Clinical Hospital No. 52Moscow City Clinical Hospital No. 52Lipetsk Regional Oncological DispensaryChelyabinsk City Clinical Hospital No. 1Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical HospitalN.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaN.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaRegional Clinical HospitalTula Regional Clinical HospitalRegional Clinical HospitalKrasnoyarsk Interdistrict Clinical Hospital No. 7Irkutsk Regional Clinical HospitalIrkutsk Regional Oncology DispensaryN.A. Semashko Republican Clinical Hospital, Ministry of Health of the Republic of BuryatiaRegional Clinical HospitalRegional Clinical HospitalBackground. Data from real-life clinical practice studies provide additional information on the efficacy of new antitumor therapy regimens, including in patients who meet exclusion criteria for clinical trials.Aim. To evaluate the Isaomex triplet efficacy in multiple myeloma patients in real clinical practice.Materials and methods. From 2021 to 2024, the retrospective study included 83 double refractory multiple myeloma patients from 26 centers aged 38 to 85 years (median 63), who received the Isaomex triplet. Glomerular filtration rate ˂ 60 mL/min was detected at the time of isatuximabbased triplet initiation in 18 % patients, 2 of whom were on program hemodialysis. The median of previous therapy lines was 2 (1–6). The median time from diagnosis to initiation of isatuximabbased triplet therapy was 47 months (5–203). Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 10 program.Results. Isaomex triplet therapy resulted in overall and renal responses in 76 % and 61 % of cases, respectively. The median progression free survival was 13.5 months. In the group of patients who did not receive daratumumab at previous stages, the median progression free survival was significantly higher and was 28 months vs 8 months (p ˂ 0.05). Threeyear overall survival was 81 %. Discontinuation of isatuximab due to the development of adverse event was recorded in 2 cases (2 %). In the group of patients with bone plasmacytomas (n = 46), Isaomex therapy resulted in an overall response rate of 67 %; 12‑month progression free survival was 48 %, and 1‑year overall survival was 76 %.Conclusion. The results of the Isaomex triplet use in real clinical practice for the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma showed data comparable to the ICARIA registration study on the frequency of achieving a response, duration of progression free survival and overall survival. The triplet efficiency was shown in comorbid patients, with advanced stages and those undergoing renal replacement therapy.https://oncohematology.abvpress.ru/ongm/article/view/979relapsed or refractory multiple myelomamonoclonal antibody isatuximabisaomex triplet
spellingShingle M. V. Solovev
M. V. Solovevа
L. P. Mendeleeva
T. I. Pospelova
N. V. Skvortsova
S. V. Voloshin
A. D. Garifullin
A. S. Chuprakova
T. A. Mitina
I. S. Usankin
I. V. Vasileva
N. V. Medvedeva
V. V. Ryabchikova
M. Ya. Kiseleva
G. A. Dudina
Yu. S. Gammershmidt
O. S. Kuznetsova
Yu. V. Dolgushina
G. B. Kuchma
T. N. Tsyganok
E. N. Misyurina
E. I. Zhelnova
A. V. Kopylova
M. N. Zakharova
A. V. Korobkin
G. S. Tumyan
A. A. Semenova
E. G. Kirillova
E. M. Volodicheva
V. I. Bakhtina
T. I. Olkhovik
N. R. Solovkova
M. V. Demchenkova
O. E. Ochirova
O. L. Panteleeva
V. S. Abramova
Efficacy of IsaPomDex triplet therapy in double refractory multiple myeloma patients in real clinical practice in Russia
Онкогематология
relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
monoclonal antibody isatuximab
isaomex triplet
title Efficacy of IsaPomDex triplet therapy in double refractory multiple myeloma patients in real clinical practice in Russia
title_full Efficacy of IsaPomDex triplet therapy in double refractory multiple myeloma patients in real clinical practice in Russia
title_fullStr Efficacy of IsaPomDex triplet therapy in double refractory multiple myeloma patients in real clinical practice in Russia
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of IsaPomDex triplet therapy in double refractory multiple myeloma patients in real clinical practice in Russia
title_short Efficacy of IsaPomDex triplet therapy in double refractory multiple myeloma patients in real clinical practice in Russia
title_sort efficacy of isapomdex triplet therapy in double refractory multiple myeloma patients in real clinical practice in russia
topic relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
monoclonal antibody isatuximab
isaomex triplet
url https://oncohematology.abvpress.ru/ongm/article/view/979
work_keys_str_mv AT mvsolovev efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT mvsoloveva efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT lpmendeleeva efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT tipospelova efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT nvskvortsova efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT svvoloshin efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT adgarifullin efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT aschuprakova efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT tamitina efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT isusankin efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT ivvasileva efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT nvmedvedeva efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT vvryabchikova efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT myakiseleva efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT gadudina efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT yusgammershmidt efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT oskuznetsova efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT yuvdolgushina efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT gbkuchma efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT tntsyganok efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT enmisyurina efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT eizhelnova efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT avkopylova efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT mnzakharova efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT avkorobkin efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT gstumyan efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT aasemenova efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT egkirillova efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT emvolodicheva efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT vibakhtina efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT tiolkhovik efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT nrsolovkova efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT mvdemchenkova efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT oeochirova efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT olpanteleeva efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia
AT vsabramova efficacyofisapomdextriplettherapyindoublerefractorymultiplemyelomapatientsinrealclinicalpracticeinrussia