Influence of internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract In epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery, the influence of internal limiting membrane (ILM) integrity after ERM removal is underexplored. This study investigated outcomes of idiopathic ERM surgery based on ILM condition following ERM removal and intentional peeling of residual ILM. In this pros...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bo Hee Kim, Chang Ki Yoon, Kunho Bae, Eun Kyoung Lee, Chan Ho Lee, Dong Ik Kim, Ki Woong Bae, Un Chul Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-05-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01987-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850140639837028352
author Bo Hee Kim
Chang Ki Yoon
Kunho Bae
Eun Kyoung Lee
Chan Ho Lee
Dong Ik Kim
Ki Woong Bae
Un Chul Park
author_facet Bo Hee Kim
Chang Ki Yoon
Kunho Bae
Eun Kyoung Lee
Chan Ho Lee
Dong Ik Kim
Ki Woong Bae
Un Chul Park
author_sort Bo Hee Kim
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery, the influence of internal limiting membrane (ILM) integrity after ERM removal is underexplored. This study investigated outcomes of idiopathic ERM surgery based on ILM condition following ERM removal and intentional peeling of residual ILM. In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, 102 patients underwent vitrectomy for idiopathic ERM. After ERM removal, ILM status was evaluated using indocyanine green staining. Patients with mostly removed ILM were allocated to group 1 (involuntary peeling), whereas those with partially removed or intact ILM were randomized 1:1 to active peeling (group 2) or non-peeling of residual ILM (group 3). Recurrence of ERM during 12-month follow-up occurred only in group 3 (36.1%), particularly when residual ILM involved the fovea. Best-corrected visual acuity, metamorphopsia, and aniseikonia did not differ among groups; however, group 3 showed significantly lower central macular thickness at all follow-ups (p < 0.05) and better macular contour restoration according to retinal thickness profiles. In patients whose residual ILM involved the fovea, non-peeling resulted in less severe vertical metamorphopsia when ERM did not recur. These findings suggest that residual ILM peeling decisions during ERM surgery should consider both anatomical and functional outcomes, as non-peeling favoring anatomical macular recovery but increasing recurrence risk.
format Article
id doaj-art-ba0cebdc143c4a848b0c400ccdba9082
institution OA Journals
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-ba0cebdc143c4a848b0c400ccdba90822025-08-20T02:29:45ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-05-0115111110.1038/s41598-025-01987-zInfluence of internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal: a randomized controlled trialBo Hee Kim0Chang Ki Yoon1Kunho Bae2Eun Kyoung Lee3Chan Ho Lee4Dong Ik Kim5Ki Woong Bae6Un Chul Park7Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of MedicineAbstract In epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery, the influence of internal limiting membrane (ILM) integrity after ERM removal is underexplored. This study investigated outcomes of idiopathic ERM surgery based on ILM condition following ERM removal and intentional peeling of residual ILM. In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, 102 patients underwent vitrectomy for idiopathic ERM. After ERM removal, ILM status was evaluated using indocyanine green staining. Patients with mostly removed ILM were allocated to group 1 (involuntary peeling), whereas those with partially removed or intact ILM were randomized 1:1 to active peeling (group 2) or non-peeling of residual ILM (group 3). Recurrence of ERM during 12-month follow-up occurred only in group 3 (36.1%), particularly when residual ILM involved the fovea. Best-corrected visual acuity, metamorphopsia, and aniseikonia did not differ among groups; however, group 3 showed significantly lower central macular thickness at all follow-ups (p < 0.05) and better macular contour restoration according to retinal thickness profiles. In patients whose residual ILM involved the fovea, non-peeling resulted in less severe vertical metamorphopsia when ERM did not recur. These findings suggest that residual ILM peeling decisions during ERM surgery should consider both anatomical and functional outcomes, as non-peeling favoring anatomical macular recovery but increasing recurrence risk.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01987-zInternal limiting membraneEpiretinal membraneRecurrenceMetamorphopsia
spellingShingle Bo Hee Kim
Chang Ki Yoon
Kunho Bae
Eun Kyoung Lee
Chan Ho Lee
Dong Ik Kim
Ki Woong Bae
Un Chul Park
Influence of internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal: a randomized controlled trial
Scientific Reports
Internal limiting membrane
Epiretinal membrane
Recurrence
Metamorphopsia
title Influence of internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Influence of internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Influence of internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Influence of internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Influence of internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort influence of internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal a randomized controlled trial
topic Internal limiting membrane
Epiretinal membrane
Recurrence
Metamorphopsia
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01987-z
work_keys_str_mv AT boheekim influenceofinternallimitingmembranepeelingduringidiopathicepiretinalmembraneremovalarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT changkiyoon influenceofinternallimitingmembranepeelingduringidiopathicepiretinalmembraneremovalarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kunhobae influenceofinternallimitingmembranepeelingduringidiopathicepiretinalmembraneremovalarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT eunkyounglee influenceofinternallimitingmembranepeelingduringidiopathicepiretinalmembraneremovalarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chanholee influenceofinternallimitingmembranepeelingduringidiopathicepiretinalmembraneremovalarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dongikkim influenceofinternallimitingmembranepeelingduringidiopathicepiretinalmembraneremovalarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kiwoongbae influenceofinternallimitingmembranepeelingduringidiopathicepiretinalmembraneremovalarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT unchulpark influenceofinternallimitingmembranepeelingduringidiopathicepiretinalmembraneremovalarandomizedcontrolledtrial