Practitioner preferences in the analysis of cremation deposits in archaeology and biological anthropology: An overview of current osteoarchaeological practices with a focus on sex estimation.

Osteological data, such as biological sex, constitute a base for research in paleodemography and palaeopathology, as well as for understanding past socio-cultural practices. Despite extensive research efforts concerning cremated human remains over the past decades, an internationally acknowledged, s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marta Hlad, Tessi Löffelmann, Jacob I Griffith, Hannah F James, Martine Vercauteren, Christophe Snoeck, Barbara Veselka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310380
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850174459077459968
author Marta Hlad
Tessi Löffelmann
Jacob I Griffith
Hannah F James
Martine Vercauteren
Christophe Snoeck
Barbara Veselka
author_facet Marta Hlad
Tessi Löffelmann
Jacob I Griffith
Hannah F James
Martine Vercauteren
Christophe Snoeck
Barbara Veselka
author_sort Marta Hlad
collection DOAJ
description Osteological data, such as biological sex, constitute a base for research in paleodemography and palaeopathology, as well as for understanding past socio-cultural practices. Despite extensive research efforts concerning cremated human remains over the past decades, an internationally acknowledged, standardized osteological protocol is not fully agreed upon. Furthermore, assessing cremation research practices from the literature is challenging because analysis reports are often written in the national languages of practitioners, which makes them difficult to access by an international audience. This study addresses this gap by directly reaching out to experts working with cremated human remains through an online questionnaire in Lime Survey. The aim is to identify and characterize patterns in cremation analysis practices. A particular emphasis was put on the methods of biological sex estimation. While the significance of these data is widely acknowledged, the ways in which they are obtained in practice are seldom examined. The results of this survey reveal an absence of standardization in protocols of analysis, and data collection, as well as in reporting on the cremated remains in publications and reports. Notably, the findings reveal regional preferences in methodological choices and inconsistent institutional training. A majority of respondents expressed a preference for traditional morphological methods over recently published metric and alternative methods for sex estimation. These variations underscore the complexity of establishing standardized cremation analysis protocols and highlight the importance of considering regional contexts and training in shaping future research practices.
format Article
id doaj-art-b9cf621756644cafa3f93d7d60db9b2b
institution OA Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-b9cf621756644cafa3f93d7d60db9b2b2025-08-20T02:19:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-011912e031038010.1371/journal.pone.0310380Practitioner preferences in the analysis of cremation deposits in archaeology and biological anthropology: An overview of current osteoarchaeological practices with a focus on sex estimation.Marta HladTessi LöffelmannJacob I GriffithHannah F JamesMartine VercauterenChristophe SnoeckBarbara VeselkaOsteological data, such as biological sex, constitute a base for research in paleodemography and palaeopathology, as well as for understanding past socio-cultural practices. Despite extensive research efforts concerning cremated human remains over the past decades, an internationally acknowledged, standardized osteological protocol is not fully agreed upon. Furthermore, assessing cremation research practices from the literature is challenging because analysis reports are often written in the national languages of practitioners, which makes them difficult to access by an international audience. This study addresses this gap by directly reaching out to experts working with cremated human remains through an online questionnaire in Lime Survey. The aim is to identify and characterize patterns in cremation analysis practices. A particular emphasis was put on the methods of biological sex estimation. While the significance of these data is widely acknowledged, the ways in which they are obtained in practice are seldom examined. The results of this survey reveal an absence of standardization in protocols of analysis, and data collection, as well as in reporting on the cremated remains in publications and reports. Notably, the findings reveal regional preferences in methodological choices and inconsistent institutional training. A majority of respondents expressed a preference for traditional morphological methods over recently published metric and alternative methods for sex estimation. These variations underscore the complexity of establishing standardized cremation analysis protocols and highlight the importance of considering regional contexts and training in shaping future research practices.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310380
spellingShingle Marta Hlad
Tessi Löffelmann
Jacob I Griffith
Hannah F James
Martine Vercauteren
Christophe Snoeck
Barbara Veselka
Practitioner preferences in the analysis of cremation deposits in archaeology and biological anthropology: An overview of current osteoarchaeological practices with a focus on sex estimation.
PLoS ONE
title Practitioner preferences in the analysis of cremation deposits in archaeology and biological anthropology: An overview of current osteoarchaeological practices with a focus on sex estimation.
title_full Practitioner preferences in the analysis of cremation deposits in archaeology and biological anthropology: An overview of current osteoarchaeological practices with a focus on sex estimation.
title_fullStr Practitioner preferences in the analysis of cremation deposits in archaeology and biological anthropology: An overview of current osteoarchaeological practices with a focus on sex estimation.
title_full_unstemmed Practitioner preferences in the analysis of cremation deposits in archaeology and biological anthropology: An overview of current osteoarchaeological practices with a focus on sex estimation.
title_short Practitioner preferences in the analysis of cremation deposits in archaeology and biological anthropology: An overview of current osteoarchaeological practices with a focus on sex estimation.
title_sort practitioner preferences in the analysis of cremation deposits in archaeology and biological anthropology an overview of current osteoarchaeological practices with a focus on sex estimation
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310380
work_keys_str_mv AT martahlad practitionerpreferencesintheanalysisofcremationdepositsinarchaeologyandbiologicalanthropologyanoverviewofcurrentosteoarchaeologicalpracticeswithafocusonsexestimation
AT tessiloffelmann practitionerpreferencesintheanalysisofcremationdepositsinarchaeologyandbiologicalanthropologyanoverviewofcurrentosteoarchaeologicalpracticeswithafocusonsexestimation
AT jacobigriffith practitionerpreferencesintheanalysisofcremationdepositsinarchaeologyandbiologicalanthropologyanoverviewofcurrentosteoarchaeologicalpracticeswithafocusonsexestimation
AT hannahfjames practitionerpreferencesintheanalysisofcremationdepositsinarchaeologyandbiologicalanthropologyanoverviewofcurrentosteoarchaeologicalpracticeswithafocusonsexestimation
AT martinevercauteren practitionerpreferencesintheanalysisofcremationdepositsinarchaeologyandbiologicalanthropologyanoverviewofcurrentosteoarchaeologicalpracticeswithafocusonsexestimation
AT christophesnoeck practitionerpreferencesintheanalysisofcremationdepositsinarchaeologyandbiologicalanthropologyanoverviewofcurrentosteoarchaeologicalpracticeswithafocusonsexestimation
AT barbaraveselka practitionerpreferencesintheanalysisofcremationdepositsinarchaeologyandbiologicalanthropologyanoverviewofcurrentosteoarchaeologicalpracticeswithafocusonsexestimation