Adherence and efficacy outcomes in young Australians with suicidal ideation using a self-management app and digital engagement strategy compared with a sham app: a three-arm randomised controlled trialResearch in context

Summary: Background: Digital interventions are important treatment solutions for suicidal ideation, but premature disengagement is a significant threat to their effectiveness. We tested the adherence to, and efficacy of, two versions of an app-based intervention (app only, app + engagement strategy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michelle Torok, Lauren McGillivray, Daniel Z.Q. Gan, Jin Han, Sarah Hetrick, Quincy J.J. Wong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:EClinicalMedicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258953702400542X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591792647700480
author Michelle Torok
Lauren McGillivray
Daniel Z.Q. Gan
Jin Han
Sarah Hetrick
Quincy J.J. Wong
author_facet Michelle Torok
Lauren McGillivray
Daniel Z.Q. Gan
Jin Han
Sarah Hetrick
Quincy J.J. Wong
author_sort Michelle Torok
collection DOAJ
description Summary: Background: Digital interventions are important treatment solutions for suicidal ideation, but premature disengagement is a significant threat to their effectiveness. We tested the adherence to, and efficacy of, two versions of an app-based intervention (app only, app + engagement strategy) for suicidal ideation, compared to a sham app. Methods: This was an online double-blind, three-arm parallel randomised controlled trial in Australia. Recruitment occurred between May 30 and August 8, 2023 and eligible participants were aged 17–24 years and had suicidal ideation in the prior 30 days. They were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive (i) LifeBuoy-an app which delivered third wave cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) skills, (ii) the LifeBuoy app plus a digital engagement strategy, or (iii) a sham app to minimise expectancy bias. The primary efficacy outcome was change in suicidal ideation scores, measured by the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS), at 30–, 60– and 120– days post-baseline. The primary engagement outcome was the number of app modules completed at 60–days post-baseline. The final assessment occurred on December 6, 2023. All data was analysed using intention-to-treat. This trial was registered at anzctr.org.au, trial number: ACTRN12621001247864. Findings: 692 participants were assigned (mean age: 19.9 [SD 2.5]; 70% female; intervention (combined): n–459, control: n–233). Significant reductions in ideation scores were observed in the combined intervention condition at 60– (d 0.48) and 120– (d 0.29) days after random assignment compared to the control condition. There were no differences in the number of modules completed between the intervention conditions (OR 1.10, 1.03, respectively) and no significant differences in their ideation scores at any time (ds −0.15 to 0.08). Serious adverse events (hospital presenting non-suicidal self-harm and/or suicide attempts) were reported by 6% of participants during the trial (control condition: 9%; combined intervention condition: 4%). No deaths were reported. Interpretation: A third wave CBT app helped to reduce ideation severity, however providing additional online resources to promote therapeutic engagement did not enhance these effects. Funding: This trial and MT was funded by the National Health & Medical Research Council, Matana Foundation for Young People, Alex Roth Foundation.
format Article
id doaj-art-b9ca10f8500d4b1cb28faf55adb1b4d6
institution Kabale University
issn 2589-5370
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series EClinicalMedicine
spelling doaj-art-b9ca10f8500d4b1cb28faf55adb1b4d62025-01-22T05:43:09ZengElsevierEClinicalMedicine2589-53702025-01-0179102963Adherence and efficacy outcomes in young Australians with suicidal ideation using a self-management app and digital engagement strategy compared with a sham app: a three-arm randomised controlled trialResearch in contextMichelle Torok0Lauren McGillivray1Daniel Z.Q. Gan2Jin Han3Sarah Hetrick4Quincy J.J. Wong5University of New South Wales, Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia; Corresponding author. University of New South Wales, Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia.University of New South Wales, Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Sydney, AustraliaOrygen Centre for Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Parkville, AustraliaNew York University, Shanghai, ChinaUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandSchool of Psychology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, AustraliaSummary: Background: Digital interventions are important treatment solutions for suicidal ideation, but premature disengagement is a significant threat to their effectiveness. We tested the adherence to, and efficacy of, two versions of an app-based intervention (app only, app + engagement strategy) for suicidal ideation, compared to a sham app. Methods: This was an online double-blind, three-arm parallel randomised controlled trial in Australia. Recruitment occurred between May 30 and August 8, 2023 and eligible participants were aged 17–24 years and had suicidal ideation in the prior 30 days. They were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive (i) LifeBuoy-an app which delivered third wave cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) skills, (ii) the LifeBuoy app plus a digital engagement strategy, or (iii) a sham app to minimise expectancy bias. The primary efficacy outcome was change in suicidal ideation scores, measured by the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS), at 30–, 60– and 120– days post-baseline. The primary engagement outcome was the number of app modules completed at 60–days post-baseline. The final assessment occurred on December 6, 2023. All data was analysed using intention-to-treat. This trial was registered at anzctr.org.au, trial number: ACTRN12621001247864. Findings: 692 participants were assigned (mean age: 19.9 [SD 2.5]; 70% female; intervention (combined): n–459, control: n–233). Significant reductions in ideation scores were observed in the combined intervention condition at 60– (d 0.48) and 120– (d 0.29) days after random assignment compared to the control condition. There were no differences in the number of modules completed between the intervention conditions (OR 1.10, 1.03, respectively) and no significant differences in their ideation scores at any time (ds −0.15 to 0.08). Serious adverse events (hospital presenting non-suicidal self-harm and/or suicide attempts) were reported by 6% of participants during the trial (control condition: 9%; combined intervention condition: 4%). No deaths were reported. Interpretation: A third wave CBT app helped to reduce ideation severity, however providing additional online resources to promote therapeutic engagement did not enhance these effects. Funding: This trial and MT was funded by the National Health & Medical Research Council, Matana Foundation for Young People, Alex Roth Foundation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258953702400542XSuicideIdeationSelf-harmDigitalAdolescentsYoung adults
spellingShingle Michelle Torok
Lauren McGillivray
Daniel Z.Q. Gan
Jin Han
Sarah Hetrick
Quincy J.J. Wong
Adherence and efficacy outcomes in young Australians with suicidal ideation using a self-management app and digital engagement strategy compared with a sham app: a three-arm randomised controlled trialResearch in context
EClinicalMedicine
Suicide
Ideation
Self-harm
Digital
Adolescents
Young adults
title Adherence and efficacy outcomes in young Australians with suicidal ideation using a self-management app and digital engagement strategy compared with a sham app: a three-arm randomised controlled trialResearch in context
title_full Adherence and efficacy outcomes in young Australians with suicidal ideation using a self-management app and digital engagement strategy compared with a sham app: a three-arm randomised controlled trialResearch in context
title_fullStr Adherence and efficacy outcomes in young Australians with suicidal ideation using a self-management app and digital engagement strategy compared with a sham app: a three-arm randomised controlled trialResearch in context
title_full_unstemmed Adherence and efficacy outcomes in young Australians with suicidal ideation using a self-management app and digital engagement strategy compared with a sham app: a three-arm randomised controlled trialResearch in context
title_short Adherence and efficacy outcomes in young Australians with suicidal ideation using a self-management app and digital engagement strategy compared with a sham app: a three-arm randomised controlled trialResearch in context
title_sort adherence and efficacy outcomes in young australians with suicidal ideation using a self management app and digital engagement strategy compared with a sham app a three arm randomised controlled trialresearch in context
topic Suicide
Ideation
Self-harm
Digital
Adolescents
Young adults
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258953702400542X
work_keys_str_mv AT michelletorok adherenceandefficacyoutcomesinyoungaustralianswithsuicidalideationusingaselfmanagementappanddigitalengagementstrategycomparedwithashamappathreearmrandomisedcontrolledtrialresearchincontext
AT laurenmcgillivray adherenceandefficacyoutcomesinyoungaustralianswithsuicidalideationusingaselfmanagementappanddigitalengagementstrategycomparedwithashamappathreearmrandomisedcontrolledtrialresearchincontext
AT danielzqgan adherenceandefficacyoutcomesinyoungaustralianswithsuicidalideationusingaselfmanagementappanddigitalengagementstrategycomparedwithashamappathreearmrandomisedcontrolledtrialresearchincontext
AT jinhan adherenceandefficacyoutcomesinyoungaustralianswithsuicidalideationusingaselfmanagementappanddigitalengagementstrategycomparedwithashamappathreearmrandomisedcontrolledtrialresearchincontext
AT sarahhetrick adherenceandefficacyoutcomesinyoungaustralianswithsuicidalideationusingaselfmanagementappanddigitalengagementstrategycomparedwithashamappathreearmrandomisedcontrolledtrialresearchincontext
AT quincyjjwong adherenceandefficacyoutcomesinyoungaustralianswithsuicidalideationusingaselfmanagementappanddigitalengagementstrategycomparedwithashamappathreearmrandomisedcontrolledtrialresearchincontext