Concession, intensité assertive et argumentation – étude comparée de deux constructions concessives en anglais
The main purpose of this article is to examine the difference between two concessive constructions in contemporary English: the clause introduced by ALTHOUGH (ALTHOUGH+P) in initial position before the main clause and MAY-BUT. This study takes into account, not only the well-known characteristic fea...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Presses Universitaires du Midi
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Anglophonia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/3071 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832579260223586304 |
|---|---|
| author | Stéphane Gresset Gérard Mélis |
| author_facet | Stéphane Gresset Gérard Mélis |
| author_sort | Stéphane Gresset |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The main purpose of this article is to examine the difference between two concessive constructions in contemporary English: the clause introduced by ALTHOUGH (ALTHOUGH+P) in initial position before the main clause and MAY-BUT. This study takes into account, not only the well-known characteristic features of concession as an argumentative process (the deconstruction of an inferential relation between two propositions, and intersubjectivity), but also another feature, namely the degree of assertiveness assigned to the propositional contents involved in the concessive process.By comparing examples where these two constructions are interchangeable and others where, on the contrary, only one construction is acceptable, we hypothesize that, if the purpose of both these concessive constructions is clearly to highlight one propositional content, the degree of assertiveness associated with that content varies depending on the choice of construction. In other words, and this is what we plan to demonstrate through a detailed analysis of contextualized examples, these two constructions implement different argumentative strategies. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b9bfe5fd46214672ba182c6fba656189 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1278-3331 2427-0466 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | Presses Universitaires du Midi |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Anglophonia |
| spelling | doaj-art-b9bfe5fd46214672ba182c6fba6561892025-01-30T12:32:57ZengPresses Universitaires du MidiAnglophonia1278-33312427-04662020-12-012910.4000/anglophonia.3071Concession, intensité assertive et argumentation – étude comparée de deux constructions concessives en anglaisStéphane GressetGérard MélisThe main purpose of this article is to examine the difference between two concessive constructions in contemporary English: the clause introduced by ALTHOUGH (ALTHOUGH+P) in initial position before the main clause and MAY-BUT. This study takes into account, not only the well-known characteristic features of concession as an argumentative process (the deconstruction of an inferential relation between two propositions, and intersubjectivity), but also another feature, namely the degree of assertiveness assigned to the propositional contents involved in the concessive process.By comparing examples where these two constructions are interchangeable and others where, on the contrary, only one construction is acceptable, we hypothesize that, if the purpose of both these concessive constructions is clearly to highlight one propositional content, the degree of assertiveness associated with that content varies depending on the choice of construction. In other words, and this is what we plan to demonstrate through a detailed analysis of contextualized examples, these two constructions implement different argumentative strategies.https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/3071argumentationassertionconcessionintensityALTHOUGHMAY–BUT |
| spellingShingle | Stéphane Gresset Gérard Mélis Concession, intensité assertive et argumentation – étude comparée de deux constructions concessives en anglais Anglophonia argumentation assertion concession intensity ALTHOUGH MAY–BUT |
| title | Concession, intensité assertive et argumentation – étude comparée de deux constructions concessives en anglais |
| title_full | Concession, intensité assertive et argumentation – étude comparée de deux constructions concessives en anglais |
| title_fullStr | Concession, intensité assertive et argumentation – étude comparée de deux constructions concessives en anglais |
| title_full_unstemmed | Concession, intensité assertive et argumentation – étude comparée de deux constructions concessives en anglais |
| title_short | Concession, intensité assertive et argumentation – étude comparée de deux constructions concessives en anglais |
| title_sort | concession intensite assertive et argumentation etude comparee de deux constructions concessives en anglais |
| topic | argumentation assertion concession intensity ALTHOUGH MAY–BUT |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/3071 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stephanegresset concessionintensiteassertiveetargumentationetudecompareededeuxconstructionsconcessivesenanglais AT gerardmelis concessionintensiteassertiveetargumentationetudecompareededeuxconstructionsconcessivesenanglais |