Impact of different 3D regions of interest on quantifying dynamic lumbar vertebral microstructure in ovariectomized rats—a micro-CT study

IntroductionThe selection of regions of interest (ROIs) is crucial for accurate microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) analysis. Distinct ROI selection methods exist for lumbar vertebras in osteoporotic animal model research. However, whether different ROIs directly affect the results of quantitative m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huihui Xu, Hong Liu, Meijie Liu, Yan Li, Jinghua Pan, Shaojun Wang, Guowei Wang, Xin Liu, Ying Liu, Xiaoqin Hou, Hongyan Zhao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2024.1503761/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850067584166133760
author Huihui Xu
Huihui Xu
Hong Liu
Meijie Liu
Yan Li
Jinghua Pan
Shaojun Wang
Guowei Wang
Xin Liu
Ying Liu
Xiaoqin Hou
Hongyan Zhao
author_facet Huihui Xu
Huihui Xu
Hong Liu
Meijie Liu
Yan Li
Jinghua Pan
Shaojun Wang
Guowei Wang
Xin Liu
Ying Liu
Xiaoqin Hou
Hongyan Zhao
author_sort Huihui Xu
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionThe selection of regions of interest (ROIs) is crucial for accurate microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) analysis. Distinct ROI selection methods exist for lumbar vertebras in osteoporotic animal model research. However, whether different ROIs directly affect the results of quantitative micro-CT-based microarchitectural data is still unknown. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two commonly used ROIs of lumbar vertebras in ovariectomized (OVX) rats at different time points.MethodsRats were randomly divided into the baseline group, the sham/OVX-operated groups, with 12- or 24-weeks sham (Sham 12w or Sham 24w)/12- or 24-weeks (OVX 12w or OVX 24w)-operated group (n = 6 in every group). The fifth lumbar vertebras were collected and scanned using micro-CT. Quantitative analyses of bone microarchitecture parameters were conducted separately for the central ROI (ROI 1) and overall ROI (ROI 2).ResultsThe results indicated that the Tb.N of baseline group rats for ROI 1 was significantly lower than that for ROI 2. The Tb.Th of rats of the Sham 12w and Sham 24w groups was significantly increased compared to that of the baseline group rats using the ROI 2 analysis. The bone mineral density (BMD) and bone volume fraction (BV/TV) were significantly lower by the ROI 1 than by the ROI 2 in all groups. The BMD and BV/TV also showed a significant reduction at 24 weeks postoperatively compared with those at 12 weeks postoperatively. Bland–Altman analysis showed good consistency between the two different ROI selection methods.ConclusionThis study found that capturing peripheral trabeculas (overall ROI) does not explain the increased Tb.Th in healthy mice and decreased Tb.N in OVX mice; both findings indicate that this is evident in both ROI. Moreover, this study suggested the potential value of the central ROI (effective and quicker) for evaluating osteoporosis of the lumbar vertebras in OVX rats and provides a basis for analyzing the morphological changes of lumbar trabecular.
format Article
id doaj-art-b9b50e5f5b4a417bb19b6c2fc51e8b7f
institution DOAJ
issn 2296-858X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Medicine
spelling doaj-art-b9b50e5f5b4a417bb19b6c2fc51e8b7f2025-08-20T02:48:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medicine2296-858X2025-02-011110.3389/fmed.2024.15037611503761Impact of different 3D regions of interest on quantifying dynamic lumbar vertebral microstructure in ovariectomized rats—a micro-CT studyHuihui Xu0Huihui Xu1Hong Liu2Meijie Liu3Yan Li4Jinghua Pan5Shaojun Wang6Guowei Wang7Xin Liu8Ying Liu9Xiaoqin Hou10Hongyan Zhao11Department of Joints and Soft Tissue Injury, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Research of Chinese Medicine on Prevention and Treatment for Major Diseases, Experimental Research Center, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Research of Chinese Medicine on Prevention and Treatment for Major Diseases, Experimental Research Center, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Research of Chinese Medicine on Prevention and Treatment for Major Diseases, Experimental Research Center, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Research of Chinese Medicine on Prevention and Treatment for Major Diseases, Experimental Research Center, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Research of Chinese Medicine on Prevention and Treatment for Major Diseases, Experimental Research Center, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Research of Chinese Medicine on Prevention and Treatment for Major Diseases, Experimental Research Center, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Beijing, ChinaInstitute of Basic Theory of Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Research of Chinese Medicine on Prevention and Treatment for Major Diseases, Experimental Research Center, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Beijing, ChinaFangta Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Clinic No. 1 Office, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Research of Chinese Medicine on Prevention and Treatment for Major Diseases, Experimental Research Center, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Beijing, ChinaIntroductionThe selection of regions of interest (ROIs) is crucial for accurate microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) analysis. Distinct ROI selection methods exist for lumbar vertebras in osteoporotic animal model research. However, whether different ROIs directly affect the results of quantitative micro-CT-based microarchitectural data is still unknown. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two commonly used ROIs of lumbar vertebras in ovariectomized (OVX) rats at different time points.MethodsRats were randomly divided into the baseline group, the sham/OVX-operated groups, with 12- or 24-weeks sham (Sham 12w or Sham 24w)/12- or 24-weeks (OVX 12w or OVX 24w)-operated group (n = 6 in every group). The fifth lumbar vertebras were collected and scanned using micro-CT. Quantitative analyses of bone microarchitecture parameters were conducted separately for the central ROI (ROI 1) and overall ROI (ROI 2).ResultsThe results indicated that the Tb.N of baseline group rats for ROI 1 was significantly lower than that for ROI 2. The Tb.Th of rats of the Sham 12w and Sham 24w groups was significantly increased compared to that of the baseline group rats using the ROI 2 analysis. The bone mineral density (BMD) and bone volume fraction (BV/TV) were significantly lower by the ROI 1 than by the ROI 2 in all groups. The BMD and BV/TV also showed a significant reduction at 24 weeks postoperatively compared with those at 12 weeks postoperatively. Bland–Altman analysis showed good consistency between the two different ROI selection methods.ConclusionThis study found that capturing peripheral trabeculas (overall ROI) does not explain the increased Tb.Th in healthy mice and decreased Tb.N in OVX mice; both findings indicate that this is evident in both ROI. Moreover, this study suggested the potential value of the central ROI (effective and quicker) for evaluating osteoporosis of the lumbar vertebras in OVX rats and provides a basis for analyzing the morphological changes of lumbar trabecular.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2024.1503761/fullmicro-CTregions of interestovariectomylumbar vertebraeosteoporosis
spellingShingle Huihui Xu
Huihui Xu
Hong Liu
Meijie Liu
Yan Li
Jinghua Pan
Shaojun Wang
Guowei Wang
Xin Liu
Ying Liu
Xiaoqin Hou
Hongyan Zhao
Impact of different 3D regions of interest on quantifying dynamic lumbar vertebral microstructure in ovariectomized rats—a micro-CT study
Frontiers in Medicine
micro-CT
regions of interest
ovariectomy
lumbar vertebrae
osteoporosis
title Impact of different 3D regions of interest on quantifying dynamic lumbar vertebral microstructure in ovariectomized rats—a micro-CT study
title_full Impact of different 3D regions of interest on quantifying dynamic lumbar vertebral microstructure in ovariectomized rats—a micro-CT study
title_fullStr Impact of different 3D regions of interest on quantifying dynamic lumbar vertebral microstructure in ovariectomized rats—a micro-CT study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of different 3D regions of interest on quantifying dynamic lumbar vertebral microstructure in ovariectomized rats—a micro-CT study
title_short Impact of different 3D regions of interest on quantifying dynamic lumbar vertebral microstructure in ovariectomized rats—a micro-CT study
title_sort impact of different 3d regions of interest on quantifying dynamic lumbar vertebral microstructure in ovariectomized rats a micro ct study
topic micro-CT
regions of interest
ovariectomy
lumbar vertebrae
osteoporosis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2024.1503761/full
work_keys_str_mv AT huihuixu impactofdifferent3dregionsofinterestonquantifyingdynamiclumbarvertebralmicrostructureinovariectomizedratsamicroctstudy
AT huihuixu impactofdifferent3dregionsofinterestonquantifyingdynamiclumbarvertebralmicrostructureinovariectomizedratsamicroctstudy
AT hongliu impactofdifferent3dregionsofinterestonquantifyingdynamiclumbarvertebralmicrostructureinovariectomizedratsamicroctstudy
AT meijieliu impactofdifferent3dregionsofinterestonquantifyingdynamiclumbarvertebralmicrostructureinovariectomizedratsamicroctstudy
AT yanli impactofdifferent3dregionsofinterestonquantifyingdynamiclumbarvertebralmicrostructureinovariectomizedratsamicroctstudy
AT jinghuapan impactofdifferent3dregionsofinterestonquantifyingdynamiclumbarvertebralmicrostructureinovariectomizedratsamicroctstudy
AT shaojunwang impactofdifferent3dregionsofinterestonquantifyingdynamiclumbarvertebralmicrostructureinovariectomizedratsamicroctstudy
AT guoweiwang impactofdifferent3dregionsofinterestonquantifyingdynamiclumbarvertebralmicrostructureinovariectomizedratsamicroctstudy
AT xinliu impactofdifferent3dregionsofinterestonquantifyingdynamiclumbarvertebralmicrostructureinovariectomizedratsamicroctstudy
AT yingliu impactofdifferent3dregionsofinterestonquantifyingdynamiclumbarvertebralmicrostructureinovariectomizedratsamicroctstudy
AT xiaoqinhou impactofdifferent3dregionsofinterestonquantifyingdynamiclumbarvertebralmicrostructureinovariectomizedratsamicroctstudy
AT hongyanzhao impactofdifferent3dregionsofinterestonquantifyingdynamiclumbarvertebralmicrostructureinovariectomizedratsamicroctstudy