Survival and harvest‐related mortality of white‐tailed deer in massachusetts

Abstract We monitored 142 radiocollared adult (≥1.0 yr old) white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in 3 study areas of Massachusetts, USA, to estimate annual survival and mortality due to legal hunting. We then applied these rates to deer harvest information to estimate deer population trends ov...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John E. Mcdonald Jr., Stephen Destefano, Christopher Gaughan, Michael Mayer, William A. Woytek, Sonja Christensen, Todd K. Fuller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2011-09-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.40
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850257349585928192
author John E. Mcdonald Jr.
Stephen Destefano
Christopher Gaughan
Michael Mayer
William A. Woytek
Sonja Christensen
Todd K. Fuller
author_facet John E. Mcdonald Jr.
Stephen Destefano
Christopher Gaughan
Michael Mayer
William A. Woytek
Sonja Christensen
Todd K. Fuller
author_sort John E. Mcdonald Jr.
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We monitored 142 radiocollared adult (≥1.0 yr old) white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in 3 study areas of Massachusetts, USA, to estimate annual survival and mortality due to legal hunting. We then applied these rates to deer harvest information to estimate deer population trends over time, and compared these to trends derived solely from harvest data estimates. Estimated adult female survival rates were similar (0.82–0.86), and uniformly high, across 3 management zones in Massachusetts that differed in landscape composition, human density, and harvest regulations. Legal hunting accounted for 16–29% of all adult female mortality. Estimated adult male survival rates varied from 0.55 to 0.79, and legal hunting accounted for 40–75% of all mortality. Use of composite hunting mortality rates produced realistic estimates for adult deer populations in 2 zones, but not for the third, where estimation was hindered by regulatory restrictions on antlerless deer harvest. In addition, the population estimates we calculated were generally higher than those derived from population reconstruction, likely due to relatively low harvest pressure. Legal harvest may not be the dominant form of deer mortality in developed landscapes; thus, estimates of populations or trends that rely solely on harvest data will likely be underestimates. © 2011 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-b9a73e853c2f45379a6c415b60da4947
institution OA Journals
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2011-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-b9a73e853c2f45379a6c415b60da49472025-08-20T01:56:27ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402011-09-0135320921910.1002/wsb.40Survival and harvest‐related mortality of white‐tailed deer in massachusettsJohn E. Mcdonald Jr.0Stephen Destefano1Christopher Gaughan2Michael Mayer3William A. Woytek4Sonja Christensen5Todd K. Fuller6United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Drive, Hadley, MA 01035, USAUnited States Geological Survey, Massachusetts Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003‐9285, USADepartment of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003‐9285, USA and Idaho Fish and Game Department, 99 Highway 93 North, Salmon, ID 83467, USADepartment of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003‐9285 and Bonneville Power Administration, 905 NE 11th Avenue, Portland, OR 97232, USAMassachusetts Environmental Police, 251 Causeway Street, Boston, MA 02114, USAMassachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, 1 Rabbit Hill Road, Westborough, MA 01581, USADepartment of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003‐9285, USAAbstract We monitored 142 radiocollared adult (≥1.0 yr old) white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in 3 study areas of Massachusetts, USA, to estimate annual survival and mortality due to legal hunting. We then applied these rates to deer harvest information to estimate deer population trends over time, and compared these to trends derived solely from harvest data estimates. Estimated adult female survival rates were similar (0.82–0.86), and uniformly high, across 3 management zones in Massachusetts that differed in landscape composition, human density, and harvest regulations. Legal hunting accounted for 16–29% of all adult female mortality. Estimated adult male survival rates varied from 0.55 to 0.79, and legal hunting accounted for 40–75% of all mortality. Use of composite hunting mortality rates produced realistic estimates for adult deer populations in 2 zones, but not for the third, where estimation was hindered by regulatory restrictions on antlerless deer harvest. In addition, the population estimates we calculated were generally higher than those derived from population reconstruction, likely due to relatively low harvest pressure. Legal harvest may not be the dominant form of deer mortality in developed landscapes; thus, estimates of populations or trends that rely solely on harvest data will likely be underestimates. © 2011 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.40huntingmanagementMassachusettsmortalityOdocoileus virginianuspopulation
spellingShingle John E. Mcdonald Jr.
Stephen Destefano
Christopher Gaughan
Michael Mayer
William A. Woytek
Sonja Christensen
Todd K. Fuller
Survival and harvest‐related mortality of white‐tailed deer in massachusetts
Wildlife Society Bulletin
hunting
management
Massachusetts
mortality
Odocoileus virginianus
population
title Survival and harvest‐related mortality of white‐tailed deer in massachusetts
title_full Survival and harvest‐related mortality of white‐tailed deer in massachusetts
title_fullStr Survival and harvest‐related mortality of white‐tailed deer in massachusetts
title_full_unstemmed Survival and harvest‐related mortality of white‐tailed deer in massachusetts
title_short Survival and harvest‐related mortality of white‐tailed deer in massachusetts
title_sort survival and harvest related mortality of white tailed deer in massachusetts
topic hunting
management
Massachusetts
mortality
Odocoileus virginianus
population
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.40
work_keys_str_mv AT johnemcdonaldjr survivalandharvestrelatedmortalityofwhitetaileddeerinmassachusetts
AT stephendestefano survivalandharvestrelatedmortalityofwhitetaileddeerinmassachusetts
AT christophergaughan survivalandharvestrelatedmortalityofwhitetaileddeerinmassachusetts
AT michaelmayer survivalandharvestrelatedmortalityofwhitetaileddeerinmassachusetts
AT williamawoytek survivalandharvestrelatedmortalityofwhitetaileddeerinmassachusetts
AT sonjachristensen survivalandharvestrelatedmortalityofwhitetaileddeerinmassachusetts
AT toddkfuller survivalandharvestrelatedmortalityofwhitetaileddeerinmassachusetts