Psychological distress among refugees in Germany: a cross-sectional analysis of individual and contextual risk factors and potential consequences for integration using a nationally representative survey
Objectives Responding to the mental health needs of refugees remains a pressing challenge worldwide. We estimated the prevalence of psychological distress in a large refugee population in Germany and assessed its association with host country factors amenable to policy intervention and integration i...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020-08-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/8/e033658.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850215333480103936 |
|---|---|
| author | Ana Nanette Tibubos Lena Walther Hannes Kröger Thi Minh Tam Ta Christian von Scheve Jürgen Schupp Eric Hahn Malek Bajbouj |
| author_facet | Ana Nanette Tibubos Lena Walther Hannes Kröger Thi Minh Tam Ta Christian von Scheve Jürgen Schupp Eric Hahn Malek Bajbouj |
| author_sort | Ana Nanette Tibubos |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives Responding to the mental health needs of refugees remains a pressing challenge worldwide. We estimated the prevalence of psychological distress in a large refugee population in Germany and assessed its association with host country factors amenable to policy intervention and integration indicators.Design A cross-sectional and population-based secondary analysis of the 2017 wave of the IAB-BAMF-SOEP refugee survey.Setting Germany.Participants 2639 adult refugees who arrived in Germany between 2013 and 2016.Main outcome measures Psychological distress involving symptoms of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder was measured using the Refugee Health Screener-13.Results Almost half of the population surveyed (41.2% (95% CI: 37.9% to 44.6%)) was affected by mild, moderate or severe levels of psychological distress. 10.9% (8.4% to 13.5%) of the population screened positive for severe distress indicative of an urgent need for care. Prevalence of distress was particularly high for females (53.0% (47.2% to 58.8%)), older refugees (aged ≥55, 70.4% (58.5% to 82.2%)) and Afghans (61.5% (53.5% to 69.5%)). Individuals under threat of deportation were at a greater risk of distress than protection status holder (risk ratio: 1.55 (95% CI: 1.14 to 2.10)), single males at a greater risk than males with nuclear families living in Germany (1.34 (1.04 to 1.74)) and those in refugee housing facilities at a greater risk than those in private housing (1.21 (1.02 to 1.43)). Distressed males had a lower likelihood of employment (0.67 (0.52 to 0.86)) and reduced participation in integration courses (0.90 (0.81 to 0.99)). A trend of reduced participation in educational programmes was observed in affected females (0.42 (0.17 to 1.01)).Conclusion The finding that a substantial minority of refugees in Germany exhibits symptoms of distress calls for an expansion of mental health services for this population. Service providers and policy-makers should consider the increased prevalence among female, older and Afghan refugees, as well as among single males, residents in housing facilities and those under threat of deportation. The associations between mental health and integration processes such as labour market, educational programme and integration course participation also warrant consideration. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b962fbcbbb4f4e6dab62d3e27374d938 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-08-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-b962fbcbbb4f4e6dab62d3e27374d9382025-08-20T02:08:39ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-08-0110810.1136/bmjopen-2019-033658Psychological distress among refugees in Germany: a cross-sectional analysis of individual and contextual risk factors and potential consequences for integration using a nationally representative surveyAna Nanette Tibubos0Lena Walther1Hannes Kröger2Thi Minh Tam Ta3Christian von Scheve4Jürgen Schupp5Eric Hahn6Malek Bajbouj7Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Mainz, Rheinland-Pfalz, GermanyKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanySozio-oekonomisches Panel, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung eV, Berlin, GermanyKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanySozio-oekonomisches Panel, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung eV, Berlin, GermanySozio-oekonomisches Panel, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung eV, Berlin, GermanyKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanyKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanyObjectives Responding to the mental health needs of refugees remains a pressing challenge worldwide. We estimated the prevalence of psychological distress in a large refugee population in Germany and assessed its association with host country factors amenable to policy intervention and integration indicators.Design A cross-sectional and population-based secondary analysis of the 2017 wave of the IAB-BAMF-SOEP refugee survey.Setting Germany.Participants 2639 adult refugees who arrived in Germany between 2013 and 2016.Main outcome measures Psychological distress involving symptoms of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder was measured using the Refugee Health Screener-13.Results Almost half of the population surveyed (41.2% (95% CI: 37.9% to 44.6%)) was affected by mild, moderate or severe levels of psychological distress. 10.9% (8.4% to 13.5%) of the population screened positive for severe distress indicative of an urgent need for care. Prevalence of distress was particularly high for females (53.0% (47.2% to 58.8%)), older refugees (aged ≥55, 70.4% (58.5% to 82.2%)) and Afghans (61.5% (53.5% to 69.5%)). Individuals under threat of deportation were at a greater risk of distress than protection status holder (risk ratio: 1.55 (95% CI: 1.14 to 2.10)), single males at a greater risk than males with nuclear families living in Germany (1.34 (1.04 to 1.74)) and those in refugee housing facilities at a greater risk than those in private housing (1.21 (1.02 to 1.43)). Distressed males had a lower likelihood of employment (0.67 (0.52 to 0.86)) and reduced participation in integration courses (0.90 (0.81 to 0.99)). A trend of reduced participation in educational programmes was observed in affected females (0.42 (0.17 to 1.01)).Conclusion The finding that a substantial minority of refugees in Germany exhibits symptoms of distress calls for an expansion of mental health services for this population. Service providers and policy-makers should consider the increased prevalence among female, older and Afghan refugees, as well as among single males, residents in housing facilities and those under threat of deportation. The associations between mental health and integration processes such as labour market, educational programme and integration course participation also warrant consideration.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/8/e033658.full |
| spellingShingle | Ana Nanette Tibubos Lena Walther Hannes Kröger Thi Minh Tam Ta Christian von Scheve Jürgen Schupp Eric Hahn Malek Bajbouj Psychological distress among refugees in Germany: a cross-sectional analysis of individual and contextual risk factors and potential consequences for integration using a nationally representative survey BMJ Open |
| title | Psychological distress among refugees in Germany: a cross-sectional analysis of individual and contextual risk factors and potential consequences for integration using a nationally representative survey |
| title_full | Psychological distress among refugees in Germany: a cross-sectional analysis of individual and contextual risk factors and potential consequences for integration using a nationally representative survey |
| title_fullStr | Psychological distress among refugees in Germany: a cross-sectional analysis of individual and contextual risk factors and potential consequences for integration using a nationally representative survey |
| title_full_unstemmed | Psychological distress among refugees in Germany: a cross-sectional analysis of individual and contextual risk factors and potential consequences for integration using a nationally representative survey |
| title_short | Psychological distress among refugees in Germany: a cross-sectional analysis of individual and contextual risk factors and potential consequences for integration using a nationally representative survey |
| title_sort | psychological distress among refugees in germany a cross sectional analysis of individual and contextual risk factors and potential consequences for integration using a nationally representative survey |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/8/e033658.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT anananettetibubos psychologicaldistressamongrefugeesingermanyacrosssectionalanalysisofindividualandcontextualriskfactorsandpotentialconsequencesforintegrationusinganationallyrepresentativesurvey AT lenawalther psychologicaldistressamongrefugeesingermanyacrosssectionalanalysisofindividualandcontextualriskfactorsandpotentialconsequencesforintegrationusinganationallyrepresentativesurvey AT hanneskroger psychologicaldistressamongrefugeesingermanyacrosssectionalanalysisofindividualandcontextualriskfactorsandpotentialconsequencesforintegrationusinganationallyrepresentativesurvey AT thiminhtamta psychologicaldistressamongrefugeesingermanyacrosssectionalanalysisofindividualandcontextualriskfactorsandpotentialconsequencesforintegrationusinganationallyrepresentativesurvey AT christianvonscheve psychologicaldistressamongrefugeesingermanyacrosssectionalanalysisofindividualandcontextualriskfactorsandpotentialconsequencesforintegrationusinganationallyrepresentativesurvey AT jurgenschupp psychologicaldistressamongrefugeesingermanyacrosssectionalanalysisofindividualandcontextualriskfactorsandpotentialconsequencesforintegrationusinganationallyrepresentativesurvey AT erichahn psychologicaldistressamongrefugeesingermanyacrosssectionalanalysisofindividualandcontextualriskfactorsandpotentialconsequencesforintegrationusinganationallyrepresentativesurvey AT malekbajbouj psychologicaldistressamongrefugeesingermanyacrosssectionalanalysisofindividualandcontextualriskfactorsandpotentialconsequencesforintegrationusinganationallyrepresentativesurvey |