Comparison of two techniques of administering the Valsalva manoeuvre in patients under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled study

Background and Aims: Surgeons often request a Valsalva manoeuvre (VM) at the end of surgery (head–neck surgery, craniotomy) to check haemostasis and to unmask covert venous bleeders. We aimed to compare an anaesthesia machine-generated objective technique for delivering VM under pressure-control (PC...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shagun B. Shah, Vineet Chaudhary, Rajiv Chawla, Uma Hariharan, Neha Ghiloria, Jitendra Kumar Dubey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-09-01
Series:Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_1255_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832590630081003520
author Shagun B. Shah
Vineet Chaudhary
Rajiv Chawla
Uma Hariharan
Neha Ghiloria
Jitendra Kumar Dubey
author_facet Shagun B. Shah
Vineet Chaudhary
Rajiv Chawla
Uma Hariharan
Neha Ghiloria
Jitendra Kumar Dubey
author_sort Shagun B. Shah
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aims: Surgeons often request a Valsalva manoeuvre (VM) at the end of surgery (head–neck surgery, craniotomy) to check haemostasis and to unmask covert venous bleeders. We aimed to compare an anaesthesia machine-generated objective technique for delivering VM under pressure-control (PC) mode with the traditional subjective technique of delivering VM in manual mode. Methods: This randomised controlled study included 60 adult patients randomised to manual (Group M) and controlled ventilation (Group C) groups. Our primary outcome measure was internal jugular vein (IJV) diameter at pre-determined time points (T0 = baseline, T1 = VM initiation, T2 = 20 s after VM initiation, T3 = immediately after VM release, and T4 = 1 min, T5 = 2 min and T6 = 5 min post-VM release). Secondary outcome measures included mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, time to desired plateau airway pressure, number of patients with bleeders unmasked and surgeon satisfaction. Independent/paired sample t-tests were applied. Results are expressed as mean (standard deviation), mean difference (95% confidence interval), dotted box–whisker plots and trendlines. P <0.05 is considered statistically significant. Results: Mean differences in diameter changes in IJV (in centimetres) in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions between Group C and Group M were -0.136 (-0.227, -0.044) and -0.073 (-0.143, -0.002), respectively. VM in the PC mode produced more significant IJV dilatation (P = 0.004, P = 0.044). MAP at T0 and T1 was comparable. At T2 and T3, there was a more significant fall in MAP in Group C versus Group M (P = 0.018 and P = 0.021, respectively). At T4, T5 and T6, MAP was comparable. Conclusion: Performing VM in PC mode is a better technique based on IJV diameter, haemodynamics, bleeder unmasking and surgeon satisfaction.
format Article
id doaj-art-b94686ad641a442da22f6796758af18f
institution Kabale University
issn 0019-5049
0976-2817
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
spelling doaj-art-b94686ad641a442da22f6796758af18f2025-01-23T09:55:59ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Anaesthesia0019-50490976-28172024-09-0168982182710.4103/ija.ija_1255_23Comparison of two techniques of administering the Valsalva manoeuvre in patients under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled studyShagun B. ShahVineet ChaudharyRajiv ChawlaUma HariharanNeha GhiloriaJitendra Kumar DubeyBackground and Aims: Surgeons often request a Valsalva manoeuvre (VM) at the end of surgery (head–neck surgery, craniotomy) to check haemostasis and to unmask covert venous bleeders. We aimed to compare an anaesthesia machine-generated objective technique for delivering VM under pressure-control (PC) mode with the traditional subjective technique of delivering VM in manual mode. Methods: This randomised controlled study included 60 adult patients randomised to manual (Group M) and controlled ventilation (Group C) groups. Our primary outcome measure was internal jugular vein (IJV) diameter at pre-determined time points (T0 = baseline, T1 = VM initiation, T2 = 20 s after VM initiation, T3 = immediately after VM release, and T4 = 1 min, T5 = 2 min and T6 = 5 min post-VM release). Secondary outcome measures included mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, time to desired plateau airway pressure, number of patients with bleeders unmasked and surgeon satisfaction. Independent/paired sample t-tests were applied. Results are expressed as mean (standard deviation), mean difference (95% confidence interval), dotted box–whisker plots and trendlines. P <0.05 is considered statistically significant. Results: Mean differences in diameter changes in IJV (in centimetres) in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions between Group C and Group M were -0.136 (-0.227, -0.044) and -0.073 (-0.143, -0.002), respectively. VM in the PC mode produced more significant IJV dilatation (P = 0.004, P = 0.044). MAP at T0 and T1 was comparable. At T2 and T3, there was a more significant fall in MAP in Group C versus Group M (P = 0.018 and P = 0.021, respectively). At T4, T5 and T6, MAP was comparable. Conclusion: Performing VM in PC mode is a better technique based on IJV diameter, haemodynamics, bleeder unmasking and surgeon satisfaction.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_1255_23anaesthesiahaemostasisjugular veinsvalsalva manoeuvreventilation
spellingShingle Shagun B. Shah
Vineet Chaudhary
Rajiv Chawla
Uma Hariharan
Neha Ghiloria
Jitendra Kumar Dubey
Comparison of two techniques of administering the Valsalva manoeuvre in patients under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled study
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
anaesthesia
haemostasis
jugular veins
valsalva manoeuvre
ventilation
title Comparison of two techniques of administering the Valsalva manoeuvre in patients under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled study
title_full Comparison of two techniques of administering the Valsalva manoeuvre in patients under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled study
title_fullStr Comparison of two techniques of administering the Valsalva manoeuvre in patients under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two techniques of administering the Valsalva manoeuvre in patients under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled study
title_short Comparison of two techniques of administering the Valsalva manoeuvre in patients under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled study
title_sort comparison of two techniques of administering the valsalva manoeuvre in patients under general anaesthesia a randomised controlled study
topic anaesthesia
haemostasis
jugular veins
valsalva manoeuvre
ventilation
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_1255_23
work_keys_str_mv AT shagunbshah comparisonoftwotechniquesofadministeringthevalsalvamanoeuvreinpatientsundergeneralanaesthesiaarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT vineetchaudhary comparisonoftwotechniquesofadministeringthevalsalvamanoeuvreinpatientsundergeneralanaesthesiaarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT rajivchawla comparisonoftwotechniquesofadministeringthevalsalvamanoeuvreinpatientsundergeneralanaesthesiaarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT umahariharan comparisonoftwotechniquesofadministeringthevalsalvamanoeuvreinpatientsundergeneralanaesthesiaarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT nehaghiloria comparisonoftwotechniquesofadministeringthevalsalvamanoeuvreinpatientsundergeneralanaesthesiaarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT jitendrakumardubey comparisonoftwotechniquesofadministeringthevalsalvamanoeuvreinpatientsundergeneralanaesthesiaarandomisedcontrolledstudy