A Systematic Comparison of Data Selection Criteria for SMT Domain Adaptation
Data selection has shown significant improvements in effective use of training data by extracting sentences from large general-domain corpora to adapt statistical machine translation (SMT) systems to in-domain data. This paper performs an in-depth analysis of three different sentence selection techn...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2014-01-01
|
Series: | The Scientific World Journal |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/745485 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832554658437005312 |
---|---|
author | Longyue Wang Derek F. Wong Lidia S. Chao Yi Lu Junwen Xing |
author_facet | Longyue Wang Derek F. Wong Lidia S. Chao Yi Lu Junwen Xing |
author_sort | Longyue Wang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Data selection has shown significant improvements in effective use of training data by extracting sentences from large general-domain corpora to adapt statistical machine translation (SMT) systems to in-domain data. This paper performs an in-depth analysis of three different sentence selection techniques. The first one is cosine tf-idf, which comes from the realm of information retrieval (IR). The second is perplexity-based approach, which can be found in the field of language modeling. These two data selection techniques applied to SMT have been already presented in the literature. However, edit distance for this task is proposed in this paper for the first time. After investigating the individual model, a combination of all three techniques is proposed at both corpus level and model level. Comparative experiments are conducted on Hong Kong law Chinese-English corpus and the results indicate the following: (i) the constraint degree of similarity measuring is not monotonically related to domain-specific translation quality; (ii) the individual selection models fail to perform effectively and robustly; but (iii) bilingual resources and combination methods are helpful to balance out-of-vocabulary (OOV) and irrelevant data; (iv) finally, our method achieves the goal to consistently boost the overall translation performance that can ensure optimal quality of a real-life SMT system. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-b93500a94c6a4267ab98b11b7f8c88cb |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2356-6140 1537-744X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | The Scientific World Journal |
spelling | doaj-art-b93500a94c6a4267ab98b11b7f8c88cb2025-02-03T05:50:56ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2014-01-01201410.1155/2014/745485745485A Systematic Comparison of Data Selection Criteria for SMT Domain AdaptationLongyue Wang0Derek F. Wong1Lidia S. Chao2Yi Lu3Junwen Xing4Natural Language Processing & Portuguese-Chinese Machine Translation Laboratory, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Macau, Macau, ChinaNatural Language Processing & Portuguese-Chinese Machine Translation Laboratory, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Macau, Macau, ChinaNatural Language Processing & Portuguese-Chinese Machine Translation Laboratory, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Macau, Macau, ChinaNatural Language Processing & Portuguese-Chinese Machine Translation Laboratory, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Macau, Macau, ChinaNatural Language Processing & Portuguese-Chinese Machine Translation Laboratory, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Macau, Macau, ChinaData selection has shown significant improvements in effective use of training data by extracting sentences from large general-domain corpora to adapt statistical machine translation (SMT) systems to in-domain data. This paper performs an in-depth analysis of three different sentence selection techniques. The first one is cosine tf-idf, which comes from the realm of information retrieval (IR). The second is perplexity-based approach, which can be found in the field of language modeling. These two data selection techniques applied to SMT have been already presented in the literature. However, edit distance for this task is proposed in this paper for the first time. After investigating the individual model, a combination of all three techniques is proposed at both corpus level and model level. Comparative experiments are conducted on Hong Kong law Chinese-English corpus and the results indicate the following: (i) the constraint degree of similarity measuring is not monotonically related to domain-specific translation quality; (ii) the individual selection models fail to perform effectively and robustly; but (iii) bilingual resources and combination methods are helpful to balance out-of-vocabulary (OOV) and irrelevant data; (iv) finally, our method achieves the goal to consistently boost the overall translation performance that can ensure optimal quality of a real-life SMT system.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/745485 |
spellingShingle | Longyue Wang Derek F. Wong Lidia S. Chao Yi Lu Junwen Xing A Systematic Comparison of Data Selection Criteria for SMT Domain Adaptation The Scientific World Journal |
title | A Systematic Comparison of Data Selection Criteria for SMT Domain Adaptation |
title_full | A Systematic Comparison of Data Selection Criteria for SMT Domain Adaptation |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Comparison of Data Selection Criteria for SMT Domain Adaptation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Comparison of Data Selection Criteria for SMT Domain Adaptation |
title_short | A Systematic Comparison of Data Selection Criteria for SMT Domain Adaptation |
title_sort | systematic comparison of data selection criteria for smt domain adaptation |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/745485 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT longyuewang asystematiccomparisonofdataselectioncriteriaforsmtdomainadaptation AT derekfwong asystematiccomparisonofdataselectioncriteriaforsmtdomainadaptation AT lidiaschao asystematiccomparisonofdataselectioncriteriaforsmtdomainadaptation AT yilu asystematiccomparisonofdataselectioncriteriaforsmtdomainadaptation AT junwenxing asystematiccomparisonofdataselectioncriteriaforsmtdomainadaptation AT longyuewang systematiccomparisonofdataselectioncriteriaforsmtdomainadaptation AT derekfwong systematiccomparisonofdataselectioncriteriaforsmtdomainadaptation AT lidiaschao systematiccomparisonofdataselectioncriteriaforsmtdomainadaptation AT yilu systematiccomparisonofdataselectioncriteriaforsmtdomainadaptation AT junwenxing systematiccomparisonofdataselectioncriteriaforsmtdomainadaptation |