Le NIMBY ne suffit plus ! Étude de l’acceptabilité sociale des projets de méthanisation

Renewable energy projects are far from being unanimously accepted at local level, while they are often supported by public opinion as a mean of combating climate change. Most of the time, the NIMBYist attitude is invocated as a factor explaining these local oppositions. However, we believe that soci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sébastien Bourdin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université de Reims Champagne-Ardennes 2020-02-01
Series:L'Espace Politique
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/espacepolitique/6619
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849327847852736512
author Sébastien Bourdin
author_facet Sébastien Bourdin
author_sort Sébastien Bourdin
collection DOAJ
description Renewable energy projects are far from being unanimously accepted at local level, while they are often supported by public opinion as a mean of combating climate change. Most of the time, the NIMBYist attitude is invocated as a factor explaining these local oppositions. However, we believe that social acceptability is a much more complex phenomenon. The objective of the study is therefore to identify the factors that explain the differences in terms of social acceptability. To do this, we rely on the case of the deployment of methanization in France, through the analysis of semi-directive interviews conducted with 49 project stakeholders. Our results suggest that NIMBYism is not the main factor explaining the difficulties of social acceptability in renewable energy projects. This principle only very rarely explains the behaviour of local residents (opposition and support) towards methanization units. Other much more important parameters come into play. For example, methanization units are more easily accepted when they are accompanied by an overall policy of territorial governance based on the creation of trust, a systematic integration of all stakeholders, including those who might be opposed to them. Relationship-based management at an early stage of the project considerably increases social acceptability. Our paper put forward the role of territorial governance but also of place-attachment as major parameters to explain a greater or lesser degree of local acceptability. Far from being perceived as a hindrance to a project, citizen opposition must be understood as an integral part of territorial governance, calling for the implementation of more participatory approaches.
format Article
id doaj-art-b90e88e00ed9498c9497664dc8daeb34
institution Kabale University
issn 1958-5500
language English
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher Université de Reims Champagne-Ardennes
record_format Article
series L'Espace Politique
spelling doaj-art-b90e88e00ed9498c9497664dc8daeb342025-08-20T03:47:45ZengUniversité de Reims Champagne-ArdennesL'Espace Politique1958-55002020-02-013810.4000/espacepolitique.6619Le NIMBY ne suffit plus ! Étude de l’acceptabilité sociale des projets de méthanisationSébastien BourdinRenewable energy projects are far from being unanimously accepted at local level, while they are often supported by public opinion as a mean of combating climate change. Most of the time, the NIMBYist attitude is invocated as a factor explaining these local oppositions. However, we believe that social acceptability is a much more complex phenomenon. The objective of the study is therefore to identify the factors that explain the differences in terms of social acceptability. To do this, we rely on the case of the deployment of methanization in France, through the analysis of semi-directive interviews conducted with 49 project stakeholders. Our results suggest that NIMBYism is not the main factor explaining the difficulties of social acceptability in renewable energy projects. This principle only very rarely explains the behaviour of local residents (opposition and support) towards methanization units. Other much more important parameters come into play. For example, methanization units are more easily accepted when they are accompanied by an overall policy of territorial governance based on the creation of trust, a systematic integration of all stakeholders, including those who might be opposed to them. Relationship-based management at an early stage of the project considerably increases social acceptability. Our paper put forward the role of territorial governance but also of place-attachment as major parameters to explain a greater or lesser degree of local acceptability. Far from being perceived as a hindrance to a project, citizen opposition must be understood as an integral part of territorial governance, calling for the implementation of more participatory approaches.https://journals.openedition.org/espacepolitique/6619public debateNIMBYterritorial governancesocial acceptabilityplace-attachmentmethanization
spellingShingle Sébastien Bourdin
Le NIMBY ne suffit plus ! Étude de l’acceptabilité sociale des projets de méthanisation
L'Espace Politique
public debate
NIMBY
territorial governance
social acceptability
place-attachment
methanization
title Le NIMBY ne suffit plus ! Étude de l’acceptabilité sociale des projets de méthanisation
title_full Le NIMBY ne suffit plus ! Étude de l’acceptabilité sociale des projets de méthanisation
title_fullStr Le NIMBY ne suffit plus ! Étude de l’acceptabilité sociale des projets de méthanisation
title_full_unstemmed Le NIMBY ne suffit plus ! Étude de l’acceptabilité sociale des projets de méthanisation
title_short Le NIMBY ne suffit plus ! Étude de l’acceptabilité sociale des projets de méthanisation
title_sort le nimby ne suffit plus etude de l acceptabilite sociale des projets de methanisation
topic public debate
NIMBY
territorial governance
social acceptability
place-attachment
methanization
url https://journals.openedition.org/espacepolitique/6619
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastienbourdin lenimbynesuffitplusetudedelacceptabilitesocialedesprojetsdemethanisation