Nogai the Khanmaker: A Historiographical Problem
Abstract: Research objectives: Nogai, a great-grandson of Jochi, is most commonly known as the all-mighty kingmaker of the late thirteenth century Golden Horde, who in scholarship is portrayed as appointing and deposing khans at will and establishing an independent khanate on the lower Danube. Howe...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, Marjani Institute of History
2022-06-01
|
| Series: | Золотоордынское обозрение |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://goldhorde.ru/en/stati2022-2-5/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841563019378688000 |
|---|---|
| author | Wilson J. |
| author_facet | Wilson J. |
| author_sort | Wilson J. |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract: Research objectives: Nogai, a great-grandson of Jochi, is most commonly known as the all-mighty kingmaker of the late thirteenth century Golden Horde, who in scholarship is portrayed as appointing and deposing khans at will and establishing an independent khanate on the lower Danube. However, the author argues that this is a portrayal with little basis in the primary source materials, and instead largely a creation of the secondary literature. The present article sets out to trace its development in the secondary literature from the nineteenth century onwards.
Research materials: Briefly noting the portrayal of Nogai’s role in the relevant primary sources – the Rus’ chronicles, Mamluk historians, Rashīd al-Dīn and Marco Polo – then notes the contrast in the most prominent secondary literature on the Golden Horde of the last century, including d’Ohsson, Veselovskij, Vernadsky, Spuler through to Vásáry and Favereau.
Research results and novelty: Much of the basis for the modern idea of Nogai the Khanmaker owes to Veselovskij’s 1922 biography of Nogai, built upon by the influential histories on the Golden Horde by Vernadsky and Spuler. Later scholars have combined these accounts, exaggerating claims of his prominence with each succeeding generation and accepting, unquestioned, Nogai’s modern status as the near-total master of the Jochid ulus. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b86920d17a8246f4b1e627d08bca7a14 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2308-152X 2313-6197 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
| publisher | Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, Marjani Institute of History |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Золотоордынское обозрение |
| spelling | doaj-art-b86920d17a8246f4b1e627d08bca7a142025-01-03T00:27:41ZengTatarstan Academy of Sciences, Marjani Institute of HistoryЗолотоордынское обозрение2308-152X2313-61972022-06-0110233234310.22378/2313-6197.2022-10-2.332-343Nogai the Khanmaker: A Historiographical ProblemWilson J. 0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9601-376XCentral European UniversityAbstract: Research objectives: Nogai, a great-grandson of Jochi, is most commonly known as the all-mighty kingmaker of the late thirteenth century Golden Horde, who in scholarship is portrayed as appointing and deposing khans at will and establishing an independent khanate on the lower Danube. However, the author argues that this is a portrayal with little basis in the primary source materials, and instead largely a creation of the secondary literature. The present article sets out to trace its development in the secondary literature from the nineteenth century onwards. Research materials: Briefly noting the portrayal of Nogai’s role in the relevant primary sources – the Rus’ chronicles, Mamluk historians, Rashīd al-Dīn and Marco Polo – then notes the contrast in the most prominent secondary literature on the Golden Horde of the last century, including d’Ohsson, Veselovskij, Vernadsky, Spuler through to Vásáry and Favereau. Research results and novelty: Much of the basis for the modern idea of Nogai the Khanmaker owes to Veselovskij’s 1922 biography of Nogai, built upon by the influential histories on the Golden Horde by Vernadsky and Spuler. Later scholars have combined these accounts, exaggerating claims of his prominence with each succeeding generation and accepting, unquestioned, Nogai’s modern status as the near-total master of the Jochid ulus.http://goldhorde.ru/en/stati2022-2-5/nogaigolden hordemöngke-temürtöde-möngketele-buqatoqtahistoriographyveselovskij |
| spellingShingle | Wilson J. Nogai the Khanmaker: A Historiographical Problem Золотоордынское обозрение nogai golden horde möngke-temür töde-möngke tele-buqa toqta historiography veselovskij |
| title | Nogai the Khanmaker: A Historiographical Problem |
| title_full | Nogai the Khanmaker: A Historiographical Problem |
| title_fullStr | Nogai the Khanmaker: A Historiographical Problem |
| title_full_unstemmed | Nogai the Khanmaker: A Historiographical Problem |
| title_short | Nogai the Khanmaker: A Historiographical Problem |
| title_sort | nogai the khanmaker a historiographical problem |
| topic | nogai golden horde möngke-temür töde-möngke tele-buqa toqta historiography veselovskij |
| url | http://goldhorde.ru/en/stati2022-2-5/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsonj nogaithekhanmakerahistoriographicalproblem |