A comparative analysis of proximal obturator nerve block versus general anesthesia in transurethral resection of bladder tumor: Prospective exploratory study

Introduction: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) harbors the risk of intraoperative obturator jerks in lateral wall tumors due to obturator nerve stimulation, resulting in bladder perforation. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided proximal obturator ne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gautam Shubhankar, Ankur Mittal, Vikas Kumar Panwar, Arup Kumar Mandal, Praveen Talawar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-04-01
Series:Indian Journal of Urology
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/iju.iju_254_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849471771786346496
author Gautam Shubhankar
Ankur Mittal
Vikas Kumar Panwar
Arup Kumar Mandal
Praveen Talawar
author_facet Gautam Shubhankar
Ankur Mittal
Vikas Kumar Panwar
Arup Kumar Mandal
Praveen Talawar
author_sort Gautam Shubhankar
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) harbors the risk of intraoperative obturator jerks in lateral wall tumors due to obturator nerve stimulation, resulting in bladder perforation. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided proximal obturator nerve block (PONB) with regional anesthesia (RA) versus general anesthesia (GA) during bipolar TURBT. Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled 131 patients with lateral or posterolateral bladder tumors over 1.5 years. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I received PONB + RA (n = 63), while Group II received GA (n = 68). In Group I, 9 patients received unilateral (IA) and 54 bilateral PONB (IB). The primary objectives were to compare the incidence of obturator jerks and bladder perforations. Secondary objectives included comparing time taken for anesthesia, surgery, and associated complications. Results: Obturator jerks were observed in 60% of Group IA patients. Considering patient safety, the remaining 54 patients in Group I received bilateral PONB. Only 5% of patients in IB had obturator jerks. No obturator jerk was seen in the GA group. No patient had bladder perforation. Surgery and anesthesia times were 32 ± 6 min and 63 ± 13 min in Group IA, 37 ± 5 min and 65 ± 10 min in Group IB, and 28 ± 5 min and 64 ± 15 min in Group II, respectively, all statistically nonsignificant. Conclusion: Bilateral PONB significantly reduced obturator jerks compared to unilateral PONB providing similar safety and efficacy as GA. It is a viable alternative for patients unfit for GA.
format Article
id doaj-art-b85c701415bd434eb82a7e1a9933862c
institution Kabale University
issn 0970-1591
1998-3824
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Urology
spelling doaj-art-b85c701415bd434eb82a7e1a9933862c2025-08-20T03:24:43ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Urology0970-15911998-38242025-04-0141211111610.4103/iju.iju_254_24A comparative analysis of proximal obturator nerve block versus general anesthesia in transurethral resection of bladder tumor: Prospective exploratory studyGautam ShubhankarAnkur MittalVikas Kumar PanwarArup Kumar MandalPraveen TalawarIntroduction: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) harbors the risk of intraoperative obturator jerks in lateral wall tumors due to obturator nerve stimulation, resulting in bladder perforation. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided proximal obturator nerve block (PONB) with regional anesthesia (RA) versus general anesthesia (GA) during bipolar TURBT. Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled 131 patients with lateral or posterolateral bladder tumors over 1.5 years. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I received PONB + RA (n = 63), while Group II received GA (n = 68). In Group I, 9 patients received unilateral (IA) and 54 bilateral PONB (IB). The primary objectives were to compare the incidence of obturator jerks and bladder perforations. Secondary objectives included comparing time taken for anesthesia, surgery, and associated complications. Results: Obturator jerks were observed in 60% of Group IA patients. Considering patient safety, the remaining 54 patients in Group I received bilateral PONB. Only 5% of patients in IB had obturator jerks. No obturator jerk was seen in the GA group. No patient had bladder perforation. Surgery and anesthesia times were 32 ± 6 min and 63 ± 13 min in Group IA, 37 ± 5 min and 65 ± 10 min in Group IB, and 28 ± 5 min and 64 ± 15 min in Group II, respectively, all statistically nonsignificant. Conclusion: Bilateral PONB significantly reduced obturator jerks compared to unilateral PONB providing similar safety and efficacy as GA. It is a viable alternative for patients unfit for GA.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/iju.iju_254_24
spellingShingle Gautam Shubhankar
Ankur Mittal
Vikas Kumar Panwar
Arup Kumar Mandal
Praveen Talawar
A comparative analysis of proximal obturator nerve block versus general anesthesia in transurethral resection of bladder tumor: Prospective exploratory study
Indian Journal of Urology
title A comparative analysis of proximal obturator nerve block versus general anesthesia in transurethral resection of bladder tumor: Prospective exploratory study
title_full A comparative analysis of proximal obturator nerve block versus general anesthesia in transurethral resection of bladder tumor: Prospective exploratory study
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of proximal obturator nerve block versus general anesthesia in transurethral resection of bladder tumor: Prospective exploratory study
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of proximal obturator nerve block versus general anesthesia in transurethral resection of bladder tumor: Prospective exploratory study
title_short A comparative analysis of proximal obturator nerve block versus general anesthesia in transurethral resection of bladder tumor: Prospective exploratory study
title_sort comparative analysis of proximal obturator nerve block versus general anesthesia in transurethral resection of bladder tumor prospective exploratory study
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/iju.iju_254_24
work_keys_str_mv AT gautamshubhankar acomparativeanalysisofproximalobturatornerveblockversusgeneralanesthesiaintransurethralresectionofbladdertumorprospectiveexploratorystudy
AT ankurmittal acomparativeanalysisofproximalobturatornerveblockversusgeneralanesthesiaintransurethralresectionofbladdertumorprospectiveexploratorystudy
AT vikaskumarpanwar acomparativeanalysisofproximalobturatornerveblockversusgeneralanesthesiaintransurethralresectionofbladdertumorprospectiveexploratorystudy
AT arupkumarmandal acomparativeanalysisofproximalobturatornerveblockversusgeneralanesthesiaintransurethralresectionofbladdertumorprospectiveexploratorystudy
AT praveentalawar acomparativeanalysisofproximalobturatornerveblockversusgeneralanesthesiaintransurethralresectionofbladdertumorprospectiveexploratorystudy
AT gautamshubhankar comparativeanalysisofproximalobturatornerveblockversusgeneralanesthesiaintransurethralresectionofbladdertumorprospectiveexploratorystudy
AT ankurmittal comparativeanalysisofproximalobturatornerveblockversusgeneralanesthesiaintransurethralresectionofbladdertumorprospectiveexploratorystudy
AT vikaskumarpanwar comparativeanalysisofproximalobturatornerveblockversusgeneralanesthesiaintransurethralresectionofbladdertumorprospectiveexploratorystudy
AT arupkumarmandal comparativeanalysisofproximalobturatornerveblockversusgeneralanesthesiaintransurethralresectionofbladdertumorprospectiveexploratorystudy
AT praveentalawar comparativeanalysisofproximalobturatornerveblockversusgeneralanesthesiaintransurethralresectionofbladdertumorprospectiveexploratorystudy