The intimacy-power relationships in the usage of direct criticism in Chinese: a reflection of rapport management

This study explored the intimacy-power patterns in Chinese direct criticism and how this may reflect native Chinese speakers’ consideration of rapport management. With data retrieved from BCC, a representative corpus of modern Chinese, the analyses identified the intimacy degree and power relativity...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xin Weng, Qiaoyun Liao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2025-01-01
Series:Language and Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980824000693/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841526451089702912
author Xin Weng
Qiaoyun Liao
author_facet Xin Weng
Qiaoyun Liao
author_sort Xin Weng
collection DOAJ
description This study explored the intimacy-power patterns in Chinese direct criticism and how this may reflect native Chinese speakers’ consideration of rapport management. With data retrieved from BCC, a representative corpus of modern Chinese, the analyses identified the intimacy degree and power relativity of the interlocutors where direct criticism was used. Results revealed that native Chinese speakers use direct criticism mostly in close and equal relationships followed by distant and equal ones; also, direct criticism with different criticizing markers manifests their uniqueness that close and equal relationships appeared more in criticism with “你太(nitai) + adj.”, “我看你(wokanni)” and “你真是(nizhenshi)” while distant and equal relationships appeared more frequently in criticism with “你这(nizhe) + n. /adj.”. These results reflect that native Chinese speakers adopt rapport-maintaining/rapport-enhancing orientations by using criticism more often in close and equal relationships, together with their tendency to ignore rapport, especially in distant and equal relationships. To conclude, this study reveals the patterns of intimacy-power relationships in Chinese speakers’ usage of direct criticism, which reflects their awareness of rapport management. Overall, it provides insights into our understanding of the nature of the speech act of criticism.
format Article
id doaj-art-b83091f0727c4f1093a95eac59534ec2
institution Kabale University
issn 1866-9808
1866-9859
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Language and Cognition
spelling doaj-art-b83091f0727c4f1093a95eac59534ec22025-01-16T21:52:33ZengCambridge University PressLanguage and Cognition1866-98081866-98592025-01-011710.1017/langcog.2024.69The intimacy-power relationships in the usage of direct criticism in Chinese: a reflection of rapport managementXin Weng0Qiaoyun Liao1Institute of Language Sciences, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, ChinaInstitute of Language Sciences, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, ChinaThis study explored the intimacy-power patterns in Chinese direct criticism and how this may reflect native Chinese speakers’ consideration of rapport management. With data retrieved from BCC, a representative corpus of modern Chinese, the analyses identified the intimacy degree and power relativity of the interlocutors where direct criticism was used. Results revealed that native Chinese speakers use direct criticism mostly in close and equal relationships followed by distant and equal ones; also, direct criticism with different criticizing markers manifests their uniqueness that close and equal relationships appeared more in criticism with “你太(nitai) + adj.”, “我看你(wokanni)” and “你真是(nizhenshi)” while distant and equal relationships appeared more frequently in criticism with “你这(nizhe) + n. /adj.”. These results reflect that native Chinese speakers adopt rapport-maintaining/rapport-enhancing orientations by using criticism more often in close and equal relationships, together with their tendency to ignore rapport, especially in distant and equal relationships. To conclude, this study reveals the patterns of intimacy-power relationships in Chinese speakers’ usage of direct criticism, which reflects their awareness of rapport management. Overall, it provides insights into our understanding of the nature of the speech act of criticism.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980824000693/type/journal_articlecriticisminterpersonal relationshiprapport managementspeech act
spellingShingle Xin Weng
Qiaoyun Liao
The intimacy-power relationships in the usage of direct criticism in Chinese: a reflection of rapport management
Language and Cognition
criticism
interpersonal relationship
rapport management
speech act
title The intimacy-power relationships in the usage of direct criticism in Chinese: a reflection of rapport management
title_full The intimacy-power relationships in the usage of direct criticism in Chinese: a reflection of rapport management
title_fullStr The intimacy-power relationships in the usage of direct criticism in Chinese: a reflection of rapport management
title_full_unstemmed The intimacy-power relationships in the usage of direct criticism in Chinese: a reflection of rapport management
title_short The intimacy-power relationships in the usage of direct criticism in Chinese: a reflection of rapport management
title_sort intimacy power relationships in the usage of direct criticism in chinese a reflection of rapport management
topic criticism
interpersonal relationship
rapport management
speech act
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980824000693/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT xinweng theintimacypowerrelationshipsintheusageofdirectcriticisminchineseareflectionofrapportmanagement
AT qiaoyunliao theintimacypowerrelationshipsintheusageofdirectcriticisminchineseareflectionofrapportmanagement
AT xinweng intimacypowerrelationshipsintheusageofdirectcriticisminchineseareflectionofrapportmanagement
AT qiaoyunliao intimacypowerrelationshipsintheusageofdirectcriticisminchineseareflectionofrapportmanagement