The Comprehensive Comparison of Thermal and Physical-Mechanical Properties of the Recycled Rubber and Plastic Roofing Tiles versus Roofing Tiles Made with Different Traditional Materials
The objectives of this research were to estimate the thermal transmittance and some physical-mechanical properties of a housing cover built with roofing tiles made from recycled plastics and rubber and compare them with three other traditional solutions for housing cover: ceramic roofing tiles, conc...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2018-01-01
|
| Series: | Advances in Civil Engineering |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7361798 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849686259581059072 |
|---|---|
| author | Rosana Gaggino Jerónimo Kreiker Celina Filippín María Paz Sánchez Amono Julián González Laría Lucas Ernesto Peisino |
| author_facet | Rosana Gaggino Jerónimo Kreiker Celina Filippín María Paz Sánchez Amono Julián González Laría Lucas Ernesto Peisino |
| author_sort | Rosana Gaggino |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The objectives of this research were to estimate the thermal transmittance and some physical-mechanical properties of a housing cover built with roofing tiles made from recycled plastics and rubber and compare them with three other traditional solutions for housing cover: ceramic roofing tiles, concrete roofing tiles, and zinc sheets. This roofing tile has technical advantages over the others, due to its higher thermal insulation, higher resistance to freezing, higher resistance to hail, higher flexural resistance, lower specific weight, and lower water absorption, with lower cost than the traditional glazed black ceramic roofing tile. And it is also friendlier to the environment. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b7ff396d2e894e3fb9152da1f8caa212 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1687-8086 1687-8094 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Advances in Civil Engineering |
| spelling | doaj-art-b7ff396d2e894e3fb9152da1f8caa2122025-08-20T03:22:45ZengWileyAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80861687-80942018-01-01201810.1155/2018/73617987361798The Comprehensive Comparison of Thermal and Physical-Mechanical Properties of the Recycled Rubber and Plastic Roofing Tiles versus Roofing Tiles Made with Different Traditional MaterialsRosana Gaggino0Jerónimo Kreiker1Celina Filippín2María Paz Sánchez Amono3Julián González Laría4Lucas Ernesto Peisino5Experimental Economical Housing Center (CEVE), National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), Economical Housing Association (AVE), Córdoba, ArgentinaExperimental Economical Housing Center (CEVE), National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), Economical Housing Association (AVE), Córdoba, ArgentinaNational Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), Santa Rosa, La Pampa, ArgentinaExperimental Economical Housing Center (CEVE), National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), Economical Housing Association (AVE), Córdoba, ArgentinaExperimental Economical Housing Center (CEVE), National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), Economical Housing Association (AVE), Córdoba, ArgentinaExperimental Economical Housing Center (CEVE), National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), Economical Housing Association (AVE), Córdoba, ArgentinaThe objectives of this research were to estimate the thermal transmittance and some physical-mechanical properties of a housing cover built with roofing tiles made from recycled plastics and rubber and compare them with three other traditional solutions for housing cover: ceramic roofing tiles, concrete roofing tiles, and zinc sheets. This roofing tile has technical advantages over the others, due to its higher thermal insulation, higher resistance to freezing, higher resistance to hail, higher flexural resistance, lower specific weight, and lower water absorption, with lower cost than the traditional glazed black ceramic roofing tile. And it is also friendlier to the environment.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7361798 |
| spellingShingle | Rosana Gaggino Jerónimo Kreiker Celina Filippín María Paz Sánchez Amono Julián González Laría Lucas Ernesto Peisino The Comprehensive Comparison of Thermal and Physical-Mechanical Properties of the Recycled Rubber and Plastic Roofing Tiles versus Roofing Tiles Made with Different Traditional Materials Advances in Civil Engineering |
| title | The Comprehensive Comparison of Thermal and Physical-Mechanical Properties of the Recycled Rubber and Plastic Roofing Tiles versus Roofing Tiles Made with Different Traditional Materials |
| title_full | The Comprehensive Comparison of Thermal and Physical-Mechanical Properties of the Recycled Rubber and Plastic Roofing Tiles versus Roofing Tiles Made with Different Traditional Materials |
| title_fullStr | The Comprehensive Comparison of Thermal and Physical-Mechanical Properties of the Recycled Rubber and Plastic Roofing Tiles versus Roofing Tiles Made with Different Traditional Materials |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Comprehensive Comparison of Thermal and Physical-Mechanical Properties of the Recycled Rubber and Plastic Roofing Tiles versus Roofing Tiles Made with Different Traditional Materials |
| title_short | The Comprehensive Comparison of Thermal and Physical-Mechanical Properties of the Recycled Rubber and Plastic Roofing Tiles versus Roofing Tiles Made with Different Traditional Materials |
| title_sort | comprehensive comparison of thermal and physical mechanical properties of the recycled rubber and plastic roofing tiles versus roofing tiles made with different traditional materials |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7361798 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rosanagaggino thecomprehensivecomparisonofthermalandphysicalmechanicalpropertiesoftherecycledrubberandplasticroofingtilesversusroofingtilesmadewithdifferenttraditionalmaterials AT jeronimokreiker thecomprehensivecomparisonofthermalandphysicalmechanicalpropertiesoftherecycledrubberandplasticroofingtilesversusroofingtilesmadewithdifferenttraditionalmaterials AT celinafilippin thecomprehensivecomparisonofthermalandphysicalmechanicalpropertiesoftherecycledrubberandplasticroofingtilesversusroofingtilesmadewithdifferenttraditionalmaterials AT mariapazsanchezamono thecomprehensivecomparisonofthermalandphysicalmechanicalpropertiesoftherecycledrubberandplasticroofingtilesversusroofingtilesmadewithdifferenttraditionalmaterials AT juliangonzalezlaria thecomprehensivecomparisonofthermalandphysicalmechanicalpropertiesoftherecycledrubberandplasticroofingtilesversusroofingtilesmadewithdifferenttraditionalmaterials AT lucasernestopeisino thecomprehensivecomparisonofthermalandphysicalmechanicalpropertiesoftherecycledrubberandplasticroofingtilesversusroofingtilesmadewithdifferenttraditionalmaterials AT rosanagaggino comprehensivecomparisonofthermalandphysicalmechanicalpropertiesoftherecycledrubberandplasticroofingtilesversusroofingtilesmadewithdifferenttraditionalmaterials AT jeronimokreiker comprehensivecomparisonofthermalandphysicalmechanicalpropertiesoftherecycledrubberandplasticroofingtilesversusroofingtilesmadewithdifferenttraditionalmaterials AT celinafilippin comprehensivecomparisonofthermalandphysicalmechanicalpropertiesoftherecycledrubberandplasticroofingtilesversusroofingtilesmadewithdifferenttraditionalmaterials AT mariapazsanchezamono comprehensivecomparisonofthermalandphysicalmechanicalpropertiesoftherecycledrubberandplasticroofingtilesversusroofingtilesmadewithdifferenttraditionalmaterials AT juliangonzalezlaria comprehensivecomparisonofthermalandphysicalmechanicalpropertiesoftherecycledrubberandplasticroofingtilesversusroofingtilesmadewithdifferenttraditionalmaterials AT lucasernestopeisino comprehensivecomparisonofthermalandphysicalmechanicalpropertiesoftherecycledrubberandplasticroofingtilesversusroofingtilesmadewithdifferenttraditionalmaterials |