Assessing the relevance and uptake of core outcome sets (an agreed minimum collection of outcomes to measure in research studies) in Cochrane systematic reviews: a review
Objectives A core outcome set (COS) is an agreed standardised minimum collection of outcomes that should be measured and reported in research in a specific area of health. Cochrane systematic reviews (‘reviews’) are rigorous reviews on health-related topics conducted under the auspices of Cochrane....
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Tianjing Li, Karen Hughes, Jamie J Kirkham, Mike Clarke, Sarah L Gorst, Paula R Williamson, Ricardo de Ávila Oliveira, Ian J Saldanha, Jochen Schmitt |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020-09-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e036562.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews addressing four common eye conditions: an evaluation of completeness and comparability.
by: Ian J Saldanha, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement.
by: Jamie J Kirkham, et al.
Published: (2016-10-01) -
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps.
by: Sarah L Gorst, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Comparison of published core outcome sets with outcomes recommended in regulatory guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency: cross sectional analysis
by: Jamie J Kirkham, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey.
by: Sarah L Gorst, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)