Impact of fracture reduction quality on clinical outcomes in hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures based on a novel radiographic evaluation system: a retrospective study

BackgroundThe impact of fracture reduction quality on clinical outcomes in hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures remains insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to establish a standardized postoperative radiographic evaluation system for reduction quality and assess its correlation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Binquan Zhang, Jia Huo, Huijie Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1637763/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849770790289932288
author Binquan Zhang
Jia Huo
Huijie Li
author_facet Binquan Zhang
Jia Huo
Huijie Li
author_sort Binquan Zhang
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe impact of fracture reduction quality on clinical outcomes in hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures remains insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to establish a standardized postoperative radiographic evaluation system for reduction quality and assess its correlation with postoperative function and complications.MethodsA retrospective cohort study included 237 patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures (2012–2024). Reduction quality was classified as optimal, acceptable, or poor based on four criteria: (1) greater trochanter alignment, (2) lesser trochanter reduction, (3) femoral stem stability, and (4) postoperative femoral anteversion (optimal: 13 ± 3°; acceptable: 6–10° or 16–20°; poor: <6° or >20°). Outcomes included Harris Hip Scores, Engh's scores, delayed healing, and complications. Statistical analyses were adjusted for AO/OTA fracture classification.ResultsOptimal reduction (Grade A, n = 107) correlated with superior Harris Hip Scores (92.57 ± 4.27 vs. 82.46 ± 7.05, P < 0.001), lower delayed healing (3.74% vs. 14.29%, P = 0.031), and reduced abductor weakness (1.87% vs. 14.29%, P = 0.014). Acceptable reductions (Grade B, n = 74) showed intermediate outcomes. Poor reductions (Grade C, n = 56) exhibited the highest complication rates. Engh's scores were significantly higher in Grade A (97.20% vs. 73.21%, P = 0.002). Dislocation and heterotopic ossification rates did not differ significantly (P > 0.05).ConclusionThis study introduced and validated a standardized radiographic evaluation system to assess reduction quality in arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures, emphasizing the prognostic importance of anatomic trochanteric alignment and cortical continuity. High-quality reduction is critical for optimizing functional recovery and minimizing complications in arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures. Future research should explore long-term outcomes and advanced fixation techniques to enhance reduction precision.
format Article
id doaj-art-b762caa4dca04aebba5e2b0f073cc6c0
institution DOAJ
issn 2296-858X
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Medicine
spelling doaj-art-b762caa4dca04aebba5e2b0f073cc6c02025-08-20T03:02:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medicine2296-858X2025-08-011210.3389/fmed.2025.16377631637763Impact of fracture reduction quality on clinical outcomes in hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures based on a novel radiographic evaluation system: a retrospective studyBinquan ZhangJia HuoHuijie LiBackgroundThe impact of fracture reduction quality on clinical outcomes in hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures remains insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to establish a standardized postoperative radiographic evaluation system for reduction quality and assess its correlation with postoperative function and complications.MethodsA retrospective cohort study included 237 patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures (2012–2024). Reduction quality was classified as optimal, acceptable, or poor based on four criteria: (1) greater trochanter alignment, (2) lesser trochanter reduction, (3) femoral stem stability, and (4) postoperative femoral anteversion (optimal: 13 ± 3°; acceptable: 6–10° or 16–20°; poor: <6° or >20°). Outcomes included Harris Hip Scores, Engh's scores, delayed healing, and complications. Statistical analyses were adjusted for AO/OTA fracture classification.ResultsOptimal reduction (Grade A, n = 107) correlated with superior Harris Hip Scores (92.57 ± 4.27 vs. 82.46 ± 7.05, P < 0.001), lower delayed healing (3.74% vs. 14.29%, P = 0.031), and reduced abductor weakness (1.87% vs. 14.29%, P = 0.014). Acceptable reductions (Grade B, n = 74) showed intermediate outcomes. Poor reductions (Grade C, n = 56) exhibited the highest complication rates. Engh's scores were significantly higher in Grade A (97.20% vs. 73.21%, P = 0.002). Dislocation and heterotopic ossification rates did not differ significantly (P > 0.05).ConclusionThis study introduced and validated a standardized radiographic evaluation system to assess reduction quality in arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures, emphasizing the prognostic importance of anatomic trochanteric alignment and cortical continuity. High-quality reduction is critical for optimizing functional recovery and minimizing complications in arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures. Future research should explore long-term outcomes and advanced fixation techniques to enhance reduction precision.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1637763/fullreductionfracturehiparthroplastyradiographic
spellingShingle Binquan Zhang
Jia Huo
Huijie Li
Impact of fracture reduction quality on clinical outcomes in hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures based on a novel radiographic evaluation system: a retrospective study
Frontiers in Medicine
reduction
fracture
hip
arthroplasty
radiographic
title Impact of fracture reduction quality on clinical outcomes in hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures based on a novel radiographic evaluation system: a retrospective study
title_full Impact of fracture reduction quality on clinical outcomes in hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures based on a novel radiographic evaluation system: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Impact of fracture reduction quality on clinical outcomes in hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures based on a novel radiographic evaluation system: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of fracture reduction quality on clinical outcomes in hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures based on a novel radiographic evaluation system: a retrospective study
title_short Impact of fracture reduction quality on clinical outcomes in hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures based on a novel radiographic evaluation system: a retrospective study
title_sort impact of fracture reduction quality on clinical outcomes in hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fractures based on a novel radiographic evaluation system a retrospective study
topic reduction
fracture
hip
arthroplasty
radiographic
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1637763/full
work_keys_str_mv AT binquanzhang impactoffracturereductionqualityonclinicaloutcomesinhiparthroplastyforintertrochantericfracturesbasedonanovelradiographicevaluationsystemaretrospectivestudy
AT jiahuo impactoffracturereductionqualityonclinicaloutcomesinhiparthroplastyforintertrochantericfracturesbasedonanovelradiographicevaluationsystemaretrospectivestudy
AT huijieli impactoffracturereductionqualityonclinicaloutcomesinhiparthroplastyforintertrochantericfracturesbasedonanovelradiographicevaluationsystemaretrospectivestudy