Comparative Analysis of Utility and Efficacy of Ozone Therapy versus Laser Therapy in Periarthritis Shoulder

Introduction: Adhesive capsulitis of shoulder due to uncertain etiology of glenohumeral joint characterized by spontaneous onset of pain and reduction in the arc of active and passive movements at glenohumeral joint and essentially normal radiograph. It is considered a self-limiting condition with a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sunil Kumar, Harish Kumar, Prashant Pratap Singh, Dinesh Kumar, Vyutpanna Mishra, Ishan Ahmad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jotr.jotr_122_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823865298839666688
author Sunil Kumar
Harish Kumar
Prashant Pratap Singh
Dinesh Kumar
Vyutpanna Mishra
Ishan Ahmad
author_facet Sunil Kumar
Harish Kumar
Prashant Pratap Singh
Dinesh Kumar
Vyutpanna Mishra
Ishan Ahmad
author_sort Sunil Kumar
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Adhesive capsulitis of shoulder due to uncertain etiology of glenohumeral joint characterized by spontaneous onset of pain and reduction in the arc of active and passive movements at glenohumeral joint and essentially normal radiograph. It is considered a self-limiting condition with a natural history of 1–3 years while some have refractory course. Most of adhesive capsulitis patients are successfully treated with nonsurgical treatment such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), oral/intra-articular corticosteroids, and hydrodialtation, among nonsurgical modalities, ozone and laser are newer, safe, and show promising results in adhesive capsulitis management. A current study was done to compare between ozone therapy and laser therapy in terms of efficacy and utility in periarthritis shoulder. Materials and Methods: All patients who presented with shoulder pain and stiffness at the orthopedics outpatient department of tertiary care center of rural North India, on the basis of clinical history and examination, those who were diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis and fulfilling the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria were included in the study, after obtaining proper informed and written consent, cases were randomized into two groups for laser and ozone therapy. Results: A total of 55 patients were included in the study, among them, 42 patients (20 patients in the laser and 22 in the ozone group) were followed up to a final follow-up of 6 months and 13 patients lost their follow-up. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH) score ozone group showed a gradual decline from the preinjection score of 55.68–17.78 at 6 months. In the laser group, there is also a decline in DASH scores from the pretreatment score of 57.56–23.34 at 6 months. Difference in DASH score was insignificant up to 4 weeks across both groups. On follow-up after 4 weeks up to 6 months showed a significant difference in DASH score across both groups. Decline in the ozone group was more as compared to the laser group (P < 0.026). Conclusion: Both ozone and laser are safe and effective modalities of treatment of adhesive capsulitis but ozone is more effective in long term.
format Article
id doaj-art-b74e292a56f042328455e83c74cffbd3
institution Kabale University
issn 0975-7341
2347-3746
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation
spelling doaj-art-b74e292a56f042328455e83c74cffbd32025-02-08T07:33:02ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation0975-73412347-37462024-01-01161535910.4103/jotr.jotr_122_23Comparative Analysis of Utility and Efficacy of Ozone Therapy versus Laser Therapy in Periarthritis ShoulderSunil KumarHarish KumarPrashant Pratap SinghDinesh KumarVyutpanna MishraIshan AhmadIntroduction: Adhesive capsulitis of shoulder due to uncertain etiology of glenohumeral joint characterized by spontaneous onset of pain and reduction in the arc of active and passive movements at glenohumeral joint and essentially normal radiograph. It is considered a self-limiting condition with a natural history of 1–3 years while some have refractory course. Most of adhesive capsulitis patients are successfully treated with nonsurgical treatment such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), oral/intra-articular corticosteroids, and hydrodialtation, among nonsurgical modalities, ozone and laser are newer, safe, and show promising results in adhesive capsulitis management. A current study was done to compare between ozone therapy and laser therapy in terms of efficacy and utility in periarthritis shoulder. Materials and Methods: All patients who presented with shoulder pain and stiffness at the orthopedics outpatient department of tertiary care center of rural North India, on the basis of clinical history and examination, those who were diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis and fulfilling the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria were included in the study, after obtaining proper informed and written consent, cases were randomized into two groups for laser and ozone therapy. Results: A total of 55 patients were included in the study, among them, 42 patients (20 patients in the laser and 22 in the ozone group) were followed up to a final follow-up of 6 months and 13 patients lost their follow-up. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH) score ozone group showed a gradual decline from the preinjection score of 55.68–17.78 at 6 months. In the laser group, there is also a decline in DASH scores from the pretreatment score of 57.56–23.34 at 6 months. Difference in DASH score was insignificant up to 4 weeks across both groups. On follow-up after 4 weeks up to 6 months showed a significant difference in DASH score across both groups. Decline in the ozone group was more as compared to the laser group (P < 0.026). Conclusion: Both ozone and laser are safe and effective modalities of treatment of adhesive capsulitis but ozone is more effective in long term.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jotr.jotr_122_23adhesive capsulitis of the shoulderglenohumeral jointlaser therapyozone therapyperiarthritis shoulder
spellingShingle Sunil Kumar
Harish Kumar
Prashant Pratap Singh
Dinesh Kumar
Vyutpanna Mishra
Ishan Ahmad
Comparative Analysis of Utility and Efficacy of Ozone Therapy versus Laser Therapy in Periarthritis Shoulder
Journal of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation
adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder
glenohumeral joint
laser therapy
ozone therapy
periarthritis shoulder
title Comparative Analysis of Utility and Efficacy of Ozone Therapy versus Laser Therapy in Periarthritis Shoulder
title_full Comparative Analysis of Utility and Efficacy of Ozone Therapy versus Laser Therapy in Periarthritis Shoulder
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Utility and Efficacy of Ozone Therapy versus Laser Therapy in Periarthritis Shoulder
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Utility and Efficacy of Ozone Therapy versus Laser Therapy in Periarthritis Shoulder
title_short Comparative Analysis of Utility and Efficacy of Ozone Therapy versus Laser Therapy in Periarthritis Shoulder
title_sort comparative analysis of utility and efficacy of ozone therapy versus laser therapy in periarthritis shoulder
topic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder
glenohumeral joint
laser therapy
ozone therapy
periarthritis shoulder
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jotr.jotr_122_23
work_keys_str_mv AT sunilkumar comparativeanalysisofutilityandefficacyofozonetherapyversuslasertherapyinperiarthritisshoulder
AT harishkumar comparativeanalysisofutilityandefficacyofozonetherapyversuslasertherapyinperiarthritisshoulder
AT prashantpratapsingh comparativeanalysisofutilityandefficacyofozonetherapyversuslasertherapyinperiarthritisshoulder
AT dineshkumar comparativeanalysisofutilityandefficacyofozonetherapyversuslasertherapyinperiarthritisshoulder
AT vyutpannamishra comparativeanalysisofutilityandefficacyofozonetherapyversuslasertherapyinperiarthritisshoulder
AT ishanahmad comparativeanalysisofutilityandefficacyofozonetherapyversuslasertherapyinperiarthritisshoulder