Analysis of the Water Footprint of Central and Eastern Europe Countries
The article presents an analysis of the water footprint of five Central and Eastern European countries, i.e. Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania, Ukraine and Belarus. The first three are members of the European Union, the other two are not. These countries also differ in terms of climate. The green, blue a...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
2022-12-01
|
Series: | Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/11027 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832570584448368640 |
---|---|
author | Damian Panasiuk Petro Skrypchuk Barbara Kucharska Olena Suduk |
author_facet | Damian Panasiuk Petro Skrypchuk Barbara Kucharska Olena Suduk |
author_sort | Damian Panasiuk |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
The article presents an analysis of the water footprint of five Central and Eastern European countries, i.e. Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania, Ukraine and Belarus. The first three are members of the European Union, the other two are not. These countries also differ in terms of climate. The green, blue and grey water footprints of crop production, grazing, animal water supply, industrial production and domestic water supply are analysed. The per capita water footprint is also calculated. It is the highest for the countries of the former Soviet Union, that is Ukraine, Belarus and Lithuania, and half as low for Poland and Slovakia. In the case of virtual water, Poland dominates in the area of import, and Ukraine in export. The index of the net import of virtual water is unfavourable for Ukraine and Lithuania and is much more positive for Poland and Belarus. When calculated per capita, the net import of green virtual water is the highest for Belarus (340 m3/person/year) and Poland (148 m3/person/year). A positive value of this index was also recorded for Slovakia and negative for Lithuania and Ukraine (-282 m3/person/year). Taking into account the exposure of the southern Ukraine steppe to water stress, this is not a favourable situation for greater export of virtual water than its import.
|
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-b736cccd75444c918ad87d8467e317ea |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1733-1218 2719-826X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
publisher | Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie |
record_format | Article |
series | Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae |
spelling | doaj-art-b736cccd75444c918ad87d8467e317ea2025-02-02T14:37:36ZengUniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w WarszawieStudia Ecologiae et Bioethicae1733-12182719-826X2022-12-0120410.21697/seb.2022.27Analysis of the Water Footprint of Central and Eastern Europe CountriesDamian Panasiuk0Petro Skrypchuk1Barbara Kucharska2Olena Suduk3Institute of Economics and Finance, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Rivne, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw,National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Rivne, The article presents an analysis of the water footprint of five Central and Eastern European countries, i.e. Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania, Ukraine and Belarus. The first three are members of the European Union, the other two are not. These countries also differ in terms of climate. The green, blue and grey water footprints of crop production, grazing, animal water supply, industrial production and domestic water supply are analysed. The per capita water footprint is also calculated. It is the highest for the countries of the former Soviet Union, that is Ukraine, Belarus and Lithuania, and half as low for Poland and Slovakia. In the case of virtual water, Poland dominates in the area of import, and Ukraine in export. The index of the net import of virtual water is unfavourable for Ukraine and Lithuania and is much more positive for Poland and Belarus. When calculated per capita, the net import of green virtual water is the highest for Belarus (340 m3/person/year) and Poland (148 m3/person/year). A positive value of this index was also recorded for Slovakia and negative for Lithuania and Ukraine (-282 m3/person/year). Taking into account the exposure of the southern Ukraine steppe to water stress, this is not a favourable situation for greater export of virtual water than its import. https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/11027water footprintvirtual wateragricultureindustryhouseholdswater management |
spellingShingle | Damian Panasiuk Petro Skrypchuk Barbara Kucharska Olena Suduk Analysis of the Water Footprint of Central and Eastern Europe Countries Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae water footprint virtual water agriculture industry households water management |
title | Analysis of the Water Footprint of Central and Eastern Europe Countries |
title_full | Analysis of the Water Footprint of Central and Eastern Europe Countries |
title_fullStr | Analysis of the Water Footprint of Central and Eastern Europe Countries |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of the Water Footprint of Central and Eastern Europe Countries |
title_short | Analysis of the Water Footprint of Central and Eastern Europe Countries |
title_sort | analysis of the water footprint of central and eastern europe countries |
topic | water footprint virtual water agriculture industry households water management |
url | https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/11027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT damianpanasiuk analysisofthewaterfootprintofcentralandeasterneuropecountries AT petroskrypchuk analysisofthewaterfootprintofcentralandeasterneuropecountries AT barbarakucharska analysisofthewaterfootprintofcentralandeasterneuropecountries AT olenasuduk analysisofthewaterfootprintofcentralandeasterneuropecountries |