Analysis of the Water Footprint of Central and Eastern Europe Countries

The article presents an analysis of the water footprint of five Central and Eastern European countries, i.e. Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania, Ukraine and Belarus. The first three are members of the European Union, the other two are not. These countries also differ in terms of climate. The green, blue a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Damian Panasiuk, Petro Skrypchuk, Barbara Kucharska, Olena Suduk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie 2022-12-01
Series:Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/11027
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832570584448368640
author Damian Panasiuk
Petro Skrypchuk
Barbara Kucharska
Olena Suduk
author_facet Damian Panasiuk
Petro Skrypchuk
Barbara Kucharska
Olena Suduk
author_sort Damian Panasiuk
collection DOAJ
description The article presents an analysis of the water footprint of five Central and Eastern European countries, i.e. Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania, Ukraine and Belarus. The first three are members of the European Union, the other two are not. These countries also differ in terms of climate. The green, blue and grey water footprints of crop production, grazing, animal water supply, industrial production and domestic water supply are analysed. The per capita water footprint is also calculated. It is the highest for the countries of the former Soviet Union, that is Ukraine, Belarus and Lithuania, and half as low for Poland and Slovakia. In the case of virtual water, Poland dominates in the area of import, and Ukraine in export. The index of the net import of virtual water is unfavourable for Ukraine and Lithuania and is much more positive for Poland and Belarus. When calculated per capita, the net import of green virtual water is the highest for Belarus (340 m3/person/year) and Poland (148 m3/person/year). A positive value of this index was also recorded for Slovakia and negative for Lithuania and Ukraine (-282 m3/person/year). Taking into account the exposure of the southern Ukraine steppe to water stress, this is not a favourable situation for greater export of virtual water than its import.
format Article
id doaj-art-b736cccd75444c918ad87d8467e317ea
institution Kabale University
issn 1733-1218
2719-826X
language English
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
record_format Article
series Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
spelling doaj-art-b736cccd75444c918ad87d8467e317ea2025-02-02T14:37:36ZengUniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w WarszawieStudia Ecologiae et Bioethicae1733-12182719-826X2022-12-0120410.21697/seb.2022.27Analysis of the Water Footprint of Central and Eastern Europe CountriesDamian Panasiuk0Petro Skrypchuk1Barbara Kucharska2Olena Suduk3Institute of Economics and Finance, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Rivne, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw,National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Rivne, The article presents an analysis of the water footprint of five Central and Eastern European countries, i.e. Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania, Ukraine and Belarus. The first three are members of the European Union, the other two are not. These countries also differ in terms of climate. The green, blue and grey water footprints of crop production, grazing, animal water supply, industrial production and domestic water supply are analysed. The per capita water footprint is also calculated. It is the highest for the countries of the former Soviet Union, that is Ukraine, Belarus and Lithuania, and half as low for Poland and Slovakia. In the case of virtual water, Poland dominates in the area of import, and Ukraine in export. The index of the net import of virtual water is unfavourable for Ukraine and Lithuania and is much more positive for Poland and Belarus. When calculated per capita, the net import of green virtual water is the highest for Belarus (340 m3/person/year) and Poland (148 m3/person/year). A positive value of this index was also recorded for Slovakia and negative for Lithuania and Ukraine (-282 m3/person/year). Taking into account the exposure of the southern Ukraine steppe to water stress, this is not a favourable situation for greater export of virtual water than its import. https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/11027water footprintvirtual wateragricultureindustryhouseholdswater management
spellingShingle Damian Panasiuk
Petro Skrypchuk
Barbara Kucharska
Olena Suduk
Analysis of the Water Footprint of Central and Eastern Europe Countries
Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
water footprint
virtual water
agriculture
industry
households
water management
title Analysis of the Water Footprint of Central and Eastern Europe Countries
title_full Analysis of the Water Footprint of Central and Eastern Europe Countries
title_fullStr Analysis of the Water Footprint of Central and Eastern Europe Countries
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Water Footprint of Central and Eastern Europe Countries
title_short Analysis of the Water Footprint of Central and Eastern Europe Countries
title_sort analysis of the water footprint of central and eastern europe countries
topic water footprint
virtual water
agriculture
industry
households
water management
url https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/11027
work_keys_str_mv AT damianpanasiuk analysisofthewaterfootprintofcentralandeasterneuropecountries
AT petroskrypchuk analysisofthewaterfootprintofcentralandeasterneuropecountries
AT barbarakucharska analysisofthewaterfootprintofcentralandeasterneuropecountries
AT olenasuduk analysisofthewaterfootprintofcentralandeasterneuropecountries